Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Rationality of Dispositions and the Rationality of Actions: The Interdependency Thesis1

  • Anita M. Superson (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

I defend the Interdependency Thesis, according to which rational evaluations of dispositions and actions are made in light of each other. I invoke a model of rationality that relies on various levels of consistency existing between an agent's reasons for adopting a moral disposition, the argument for the moral theory she endorses (relying on the Kantian notion that all persons are equal in humanity), her desires, disposition, and choice to be a moral person as reflected in the maxim she adopts. The Interdependency Thesis shows that we do not need to demonstrate the rationality of every morally required action in order to defeat scepticism fully.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Richmond Campbell in his “Moral Justification and Freedom,” The Journal of Philosophy, 85, 4 (1988): 192213, at p. 199

Stephen Darwall in “Rational Agent, Rational Act,” Philosophical Topics, 14, 2 (Fall 1986): 3357, on p. 55, n.24.

Duncan MacIntosh , “Two Gauthiers?Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 28, 1 (1989): 4361, esp. p. 45.

Barbara Herman , “On the Value of Acting from the Motive of Duty,” The Philosophical Review, 90, 3 (071981): 359–82, esp. pp. 363–66.

Joel Kupperman , “Character and Ethical Theory,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 12, Ethical Theory: Character and Virtue (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988), pp. 115–25, esp. p. 120.

Marcia Baron , “The Alleged Moral Repugnance of Acting from Duty,” The Journal of Philosophy, 81, 4 (1984): 197220

S. I. Benn , “Wickedness,” Ethics, 95 (071985): 795810, esp. p. 796.

John McDowell , “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 52 (1978): 1329, esp. p. 21.

John McDowell , “Virtue and Reason,” The Monist, 62, 3 (071979): 331–50, esp. pp. 334–35.

George Sher , “Ethics, Character, and Action,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 15, 1 (Winter 1998): 125–40, at p. 14.

Gregory Kavka , in his “Some Paradoxes of Deterrence,” The Journal of Philosophy, 75, 6 (061978): 285302.

Charlotte Brown , “Is Hume an Internalist?Journal of the History of Philosophy, 26 (01 1, 1988): 6987

David Gauthier , “Deterrence, Maximization, and Rationality,” Ethics, 94, 3 (041984), p. 436

Ronald D. Milo , Immorality (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×