Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Epistemology and Possibility

  • Rebecca Hanrahan (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Recently the discussion surrounding the conceivability thesis has been less about the link between conceivability and possibility per se and more about the requirements of a successful physicalist program. But before entering this debate it is necessary to consider whether conceivability provides us with even prima facie justification for our modal beliefs. I argue that two methods of conceiving—imagining that p and telling a story about p—can provide us with such justification, but only if certain requirements are met. To make these arguments, I consider those of Paul Tidman, whose position I use as a foil.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Balog Katalin 1999Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem.” The Philosophical Review, 108, 4: 497528.
Bealer George 2002 “Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance.” In Conceivability and Possibility. Edited by Gendler T. Szabó and Hawthorne J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 71126.
Block Ned, and Stalnaker Robert 1999Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap.” The Philosophical Review, 108, 1: 146.
Chalmers David 1996 The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers David 2002 “Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?” In Conceivability and Possibility. Edited by Gendler T. Szabó and Hawthorne J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 145200.
Chalmers David, and Jackson Frank 2001Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation.” The Philosophical Review, 110: 315–61.
Gendler Tamar Szabó, and Hawthorne John, eds. 2002 Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grandin T. 1995 Thinking in Pictures. New York: Vintage Books.
Hart W. D. 1988 Engines of the Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levine Joseph 2001 Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis D. 1986 On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Putnam H. 1981 Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sorensen Roy 2002 “The Art of the Impossible.” In Conceivability and Possibility. Edited by Gendler T. Szabó and Hawthorne J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 337–68.
Tidman P. 1994Conceivability as a Test for Possibility.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 31, 4: 297309.
Yablo S. 1993Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 1: 142.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 8 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.