Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The FA Analysis of Emotional Values and Practical Reasons*

  • Stephane Lemaire (a1)
Abstract

ABSTRACT: Confronted with the “wrong kind of reason problem”, several proponents of the fitting attitude analysis of emotional values have argued in favor of an epistemic approach. In such a view, an emotion fits its object because the emotion is correct. However, I argue that we should reorient our search towards a practical approach because only practical considerations can provide a satisfying explanation of the fittingness of emotional responses. This practical approach is partially revisionist, particularly because it is no longer an analysis of final value and because it is relativistic.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

I am grateful to Christine Tappolet and Cain Todd for their very helpful comments on a previous version of this paper and to Nadja Berrebi and John Angell for their editorial assistance with the manuscript.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Bykvist Krister 2009No Good Fit: Why the Fitting Attitude Analysis of Value Fails.” Mind 118: 130.
Brentano Franz 1969 [1889] The Origin of our Knowledge of Right and Wrong, ed. Kraus Oskar and Chisholm Roderick, trans. Chisholm Roderick and Schneewind Elizabeth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Chisholm Roderick 1986 Brentano and Intrinsic Value. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Danielson Sven and Olson Jonas 2007Brentano and the Buck-Passers.” Mind 116: 511–22.
D’Arms Justin and Jacobson Daniel 2000The Moralistic Fallacy: On the “Appropriateness” of Emotions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61(1): 6590.
D’Arms Justin and Jacobson Daniel 2006Anthropocentric Constraints on Human Value.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics I. Shafer-Landau , eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
D’Arms Justin and Jacobson Daniel 2010Demystifying Sensibilities: Sentimental Values and the Instability of Affect”, In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotions. Goldie P., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ewing Alfred C. 1939A Suggested Non-Naturalistic Analysis of Good.” Mind 39: 122.
Goldie Peter 2000 The Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lang Gerald 2008The Right Kind of Solution to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem.” Utilitas 20(4): 472489.
Olson Jonas 2004Buck-Passing and the Wrong Kind of Reasons.” Philosophical Quarterly 54: 295300.
Parfit Derek 2001Rationality and Reasons.” In Hommage à Wlodek: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowiz. Egonsson D., Josefsson J.Petersson B., and Ronnow-Rasmussen T., eds. Lund: Lund University. Available atwww.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek.
Pettit Philip 1991Realism and Response-Dependence.” Mind 100(4): 587626.
Rabinowicz Wlodek & Ronnow-Rasmussen Toni 2004The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value.” Ethics 114(3): 391423.
Roberts Robert C. 2003 Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scherer Klaus R., Schorr Angela and Johnstone Tom (eds.) 2001 Appraisal Processes in Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skorupski John 2007Buck–Passing about Goodness.” In Hommage à Wlodek: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowiz. Egonsson D., Josefsson J.Petersson B., and Ronnow-Rasmussen T., eds. Lund: Lund University. Available atwww.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek.
Smith Craig A. and Kirby Leslie D. 2001Toward Delivering on the Promise of Appraisal Theory.” In Appraisal Processes in Emotion. Scherer K. R., Schorr A. and Johnstone T., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Solomon Robert C. 1993 The Passions. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Stratton-Lake Philip 2005How to Deal With Evil Demons: Comment on Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen.” Ethics 115: 788798.
Tappolet Christine 2000 Emotions et valeurs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Wiggins David 1987A Sensible Subjectivism?” in Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Wiggins, David. New York: Oxford University Press, 185214.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 198 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.