Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Intra-Family Inequality and Justice1

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 September 2012

In “The Pecking Order,” Dalton Conley argues that inequalities between siblings are larger than inequalities at the level of the overall society. Our article discusses the normative implications for institutions of this observation. We show that the question of state intervention for curbing intra-family inequality reveals an internal tension within liberalism between autonomy and toleration, which bears on the forms that the intervention of institutions may take. Despite the pros and cons of both commitments, autonomy-based liberalism appears more compatible with the involvement of the state for egalitarian reasons within the family than toleration-based liberalism.

Dans « The Pecking Order », Dalton Conley soutient que les inégalités entre enfants d’une même famille sont plus importantes que les inégalités à l’échelle de la société. Nous étudions les implications normatives de cette observation au niveau institutionnel. La question de l’intervention étatique visant à restreindre l’inégalité intrafamiliale révèle une tension interne au libéralisme entre l’autonomie et la tolérance, qui influe sur la forme que l’intervention institutionnelle peut revêtir. En dépit des avantages et désavantages de chaque position, le libéralisme fondé sur l’autonomie semble plus compatible avec l’engagement de l’État au sein de la famille pour des raisons égalitariennes que le libéralisme fondé sur la tolérance.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Richard J Arneson . 1989Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56 (1): 7793.

Samantha Brennan and Robert Noggle 1997The Moral Status of Children: Children’s Rights, Parents’ Rights, and Family Justice.” Social Theory and Practice 23 (1): 126.

Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift 2006Parents’ Rights and the Value of the Family.” Ethics 117 (1): 80108.

Gerald A Cohen . 1989On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99 (4): 906944.

Gerald A Cohen 1997Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1): 330.

Stephen De Wijze 2000The Family and Political Justice: The Case for Political Liberalisms.” The Journal of Ethics 4 (3): 257281.

Gerald Dworkin 1988 The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ronald Dworkin 1989The Liberal Community.” California Law Review 77 (3): 479504.

William A Galston . 1995Two Concepts of Liberalism.” Ethics 105 (3): 516534.

Stephen Macedo 1995Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls?Ethics 105 (3): 468496.

Susan Moller Okin 1994Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender.” Ethics 105 (1): 2343.

Cass R. Sunstein and Richard H Thaler . 2003Libertarian Paternalism is not an Oxymoron.” University of Chicago Law Review 70 (4): 11591202.

Amos Tversky , and Daniel Kahneman 1974Judgments Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 11241131.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *