Skip to main content Accessibility help

Is Epistemic Normativity Value-Based?


What is the source of epistemic normativity? In virtue of what do epistemic norms have categorical normative authority? According to epistemic teleologism, epistemic normativity comes from value. Epistemic norms have categorical authority because conforming to them is necessarily good in some relevant sense. In this article, I argue that epistemic teleologism should be rejected. The problem, I argue, is that there is no relevant sense in which it is necessarily good to believe in accordance with epistemic norms, including in cases where the matter at hand is completely trivial. Therefore, if epistemology is normative, its normativity won’t come from value.

Quelle est la source de la normativité épistémique? En vertu de quoi les normes épistémiques possèdent-elles une autorité normative catégorique? Selon la réponse téléologique, la normativité épistémique provient de la valeur. Les normes épistémiques ont une autorité catégorique parce qu’il est nécessairement bon de s’y conformer. Dans cet article, je soutiens que le téléologisme épistémique doit être rejeté. Le problème est qu’il n’y a pas de sens pertinent dans lequel croire en conformité avec les normes épistémiques est nécessairement bon, même lorsque la croyance en question est complètement triviale. Si l’épistémologie est normative, sa normativité ne provient pas de la valeur.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Anscombe, G.E.M. 1957 Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bergmann, Michael 2006 Justification without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bird, Alexander 2007 “Justified Judging.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1): 81110.
Broome, John 2013 Rationality through Reasoning. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Burge, Tyler 2003 “Perceptual Entitlement.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3): 503548.
Côté-Bouchard, Charles 2015 “Epistemic Instrumentalism and the Too Few Reasons Objection.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (3): 337355.
Côté-Bouchard, Charles 2016 “Can the Aim of Belief Ground Epistemic Normativity?” Philosophical Studies 173 (12): 31813198.
Cuneo, Terence 2007 The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
David, Marian 2005 “On ‘Truth is Good.’” Philosophical Books 46 (4): 292301.
Fassio, Davide 2011 “Belief, Correctness and Normativity.” Logique et Analyse 54 (216): 471486.
Gibbons, John 2013 The Norm of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Graham, Peter 2012 “Epistemic Entitlement.” Noûs 46 (3): 449482.
Grimm, Stephen R. 2009 “Epistemic Normativity.” In Epistemic Value, edited by Haddock, Adrian, Millar, Alan, and Pritchard, Duncan, 243264: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hattiangadi, Anandi 2007 Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hazlett, Allan 2013 A Luxury of the Understanding: On the Value of True Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horwich, Paul 2006 “The Value of Truth.” Noûs 40 (2): 347360.
Joyce, Richard 2001 The Myth of Morality Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, Thomas 2003 “Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3): 612640.
Kelly, Thomas 2007 “Evidence and Normativity: Reply to Leite.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2): 465474.
Kim, Jaegwon 1988 “What is ‘Naturalized Epistemology?’” Philosophical Perspectives 2: 381405.
Kornblith, Hilary 1993 “Epistemic Normativity.” Synthese 94 (3): 357376.
Kvanvig, Jonathan 2008 “Pointless Truth.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1): 199212.
Laudan, Larry 1990a “Aim-Less Epistemology?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2): 315322.
Laudan, Larry 1990b “Normative Naturalism.” Philosophy of Science 57 (1): 4459.
Leite, Adam 2007 “Epistemic Instrumentalism and Reasons for Belief: A Reply to Tom Kelly’s Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2): 456464.
Littlejohn, Clayton 2013 “The Russellian Retreat.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (3pt3): 293320.
Lockard, Matthew 2013 “Epistemic Instrumentalism.” Synthese 190 (9): 17011718.
Lynch, Michael 2004 True to Life: Why Truth Matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maffie, James 1990 “Naturalism and the Normativity of Epistemology.” Philosophical Studies 59 (3): 333349.
Maguire, Barry, and Woods, Jack Ms. “Explaining Epistemic Normativity.”
McGrath, Matthew 2005 “Lynch on the Value of Truth.” Philosophical Books 46 (4): 302310.
McHugh, Conor 2011 “What Do We Aim At When We Believe?” Dialectica 65 (3): 369392.
McPherson, Tristram 2011 “Against Quietist Normative Realism.” Philosophical Studies 154 (2): 223240.
Nolfi, Kate 2015 “How to be a Normativist about the Nature of Belief.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (2): 181204.
Olson, Jonas 2014 Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Papineau, David 2013 “There Are no Norms of Belief.” In The Aim of Belief, edited by Chan, Timothy, 64-79: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parfit, Derek 2011 On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, Joseph 2011 From Normativity to Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rowland, Richard 2013 “Moral Error Theory and the Argument from Epistemic Reasons.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (1): 124.
Setiya, Kieran 2003 “Explaining Action.” Philosophical Review 112 (3): 339393.
Sosa, Ernest 2007 A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Velleman, David 2000 The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whiting, Daniel 2013 “The Good and the True (Or the Bad and the False).” Philosophy 8 (2): 219242.
Wrenn, Chase B. 2015a Truth. Cambridge: Polity.
Wrenn, Chase B. 2015b “Truth is Not (Very) Intrinsically Valuable.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2): 108128.
Zagzebski, Linda 2003 “The Search for the Source of Epistemic Good.” Metaphilosophy 34 (1-2): 1228.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed