Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Meaning and Evidence

  • John C. Bigelow (a1)
Extract

What is it for a person to mean something by an utterance? Until recently, few philosophers have explicitly set themselves the task of answering this question. Of those who have, most have proposed answers which in one way or another analyze the act of meaning by appeal to the utterer's intentions.

Copyright
References
Hide All

1 Meaning”, The Philosophical Review, 66 (1957), pp. 377388; Utterer's Meaning and Intentions”, The Philosophical Review, 78 (1969), pp. 147177; Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning”, Foundations of Language, 4 (1968), pp. 225242.

2 Meaning, Oxford, 1972.

3 Speech Acts, Cambridge, 1969; especially pp. 42–50.

4 Meaning and Communication”, The Philosophical Review, 80 (1971), pp. 427447.

5 See for instance Grice, “Meaning”, pp. 385–386.

6 See for instance Armstrong, “Meaning and Communication”, pp. 443–444.

7 “Utterer's Meaning and Intentions”, pp. 152–165; also clause “III” on p. 176.

8 Meaning, p. 30 ff.

9 The Meaning-Nominalist Strategy”, Foundations of Language, 10 (1973), pp. 141168; also unpublished work which should appear soon as a book.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 48 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.