Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Open Bill of Rights: A Reply to Carole Stewart

  • R. N. McLaughlin (a1)
Copyright
References
Hide All

page 581 note 1 A Bill of Rights: A Reply to R. N. McLaughlin”, Dialogue, Vol. XII, p. 676.

page 582 note 2 On a Bill of Rights”, Dialogue, Vol. VIII, p. 433.

page 582 note 1 R.S.C., 1970, App. III.

page 582 note 2 See my comments “R v. Smythe — The Canadian Bill of Rights — ‘Equality before the law’ — The Meaning of ‘Discrimination’”, Canadian Bar Review, 1973, p. 517 and “The Attorney General of Canada v. Lavell and Equality Before the Law”, Chitty's Law Journal, Vol. 21 (1973), p. 282.

page 583 note 1 Op. cit. p. 440.

page 584 note 1 The Attorney General of Canada v. Lavell, [1972] 1 O.R. p. 390, 22 D.L.R. (3d) p. 188, 38 D.L.R. (3d) p. 481.

page 584 note 2 If the decision of Osier J. on the same point is included, the count becomes six to six. See Bedard v. Isaac et al [1972] 2 O.R. p. 391.

page 584 note 3 Op. cit. p. 677.

page 584 note 4 (1972) 26 D.L.R. (3d) p. 611.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.