Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    newman, dwight g. 2007. COLLECTIVE RIGHTS. Philosophical Books, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, p. 221.

    KOVACH, KAREN 2006. GENOCIDE AND THE MORAL AGENCY OF ETHNIC GROUPS. Metaphilosophy, Vol. 37, Issue. 3-4, p. 331.

    MURRAY, ROBERT 1999. Liberalism, Culture, Aboriginal Rights: In Defence of Kymlicka. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 109.

    Jones, Peter 1998. Political theory and cultural diversity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 28.


The Value of Cultural Belonging: Expanding Kymlicka's Theory

  • James W. Nickel (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2010

In his recent book, Liberalism, Community and Culture, Will Kymlicka defends collective rights for some minority groups—and particularly for indigenous peoples in North America—by trying to show that (1) secure cultural belonging is of great value, and (2) rights to protection and autonomy for minorities, including some collective rights, are justified by the special disadvantages some minorities face in enjoying secure cultural membership. Kymlicka defends these claims from within a liberal perspective that draws heavily on Rawls and Dworkin and that denies that groups are independent sources of moral claims. In this paper I am mainly concerned with how to defend the first of these claims, which I shall call the “Value Thesis.” One reason for being interested in the justification of the Value Thesis is that some version of it is a key part of most arguments for minority and collective rights. Another reason is that the Value Thesis is important to communitarians who frequently base their claims about the importance of community on the value of belonging.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Does Basing Rights on Autonomy Imply Obligations of Political Allegiance?,” Dialogue 28, 4 (1989): 531–44.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *