Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Anatomy of Mine Rescue Teams’ Casualty Incidents: A Basis for Medical Emergency Preparedness and Injury Prevention

  • Leilei Li (a1), Deyong Guo (a1), Yi Wang (a2), Ke Wang (a3) and Runan Lian (a4)...

Abstract

Objective

Mine rescue teams bear a high risk of injury. To improve medical emergency preparedness and injury prevention, this work analyzed the causes and severity of mine rescue teams’ casualty incidents, the primary injuries, and the link between the causes and the occurrences of the casualty incidents.

Methods

A total of 81 cases from 1953 to 2013 were used to analyze the casualty incidents of mine rescue teams based on the frequency of accidents. A panel with 4 rescue experts was set up to ensure the accuracy of the analysis.

Results

The 81 casualty incidents occurred in 7 types of rescue work and were due to 6 causes. Organizational and personal factors were the leading cause, followed by rescue skill and equipment factors. Problems with decision-making and command have gradually become the primary inducement of casualty incidents in recent years, with an average death toll reaching up to 6 to 7 people. The main injuries causing death to team members were blast injury, burns, poisoning, suffocation, blunt trauma, and overwork injury. Some of the injured died because of medical emergency response failure.

Conclusion

The construction of emergency medical teams and the preparedness of disaster medicine need to be improved to reduce the mortality of the injured team members. Actions according to the causes of casualty incidents should be adopted for injury prevention. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:695–699)

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence and reprint requests to Mr Leilei Li, D No.11, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100083, China (e-mail: lileilei6367@163.com).

References

Hide All
1.Kilinc, FS, Monaghan, WD, Powell, JB. A review of mine rescue ensembles for underground coal mining in the United States. J Eng Fiber Fabr. 2014;9:174-185.
2.Tomaskova, H, Jirak, Z, Lvoncik, S, et al. Health status and physical fitness of mines rescue brigadesmen. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28:613-623.
3.Costa, C, Stelescu, I. Increasing the efficiency of the training programs for the mine rescue teams. Ann U Petrosani Econ. 2014;14:31-40.
4.Stewart, IB, Mcdonald, MD, Hunt, AP, et al. Physical capacity of rescue personnel in the mining industry. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3:1-6.
5.Roberts, L, Bailes, J, Dedhia, H, et al. Surviving a mine explosion. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(2):276 283.
6.Engström, KG, Angrén, J, Björnstig, U, et al. Mass casualty incidents in the underground mining industry: applying the Haddon Matrix on an integrative literature review. Disaster Med Public. 2017;6:1-9.
7.Zhang, Z, Liu, L, Wang, K. Causes of rescuers death in mine emergency rescue and strategies. China Coal. 2016;42:88-91.
8.Lan, Z, Pan, X, Li, G, et al. Discussion on questions of mine rescue crew’s own casualties. J North China I Sci Technol. 2016;13:92-97.
9.Wang, L, Cheng, Y, Liu, H. An analysis of fatal gas accidents in Chinese coal mines. Saf Sci. 2014;62:107-113.
10.Dubaniewicz, TH Jr. From Scotia to Brookwood, fatal US underground coal mine explosions ignited in intake air courses. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2009;22:52-58.
11.Ni, M, Zhang, L, Zhu, S. Analysis on countermeasures for avoiding mine rescue teams’ own casualties. Coal Sci Technol Mag. 2014;3:110-112.
12.Wang, C. Analysis on mine rescue teams’ own casualties and countermeasures. Saf Coal Mines. 2011;42:158-160.
13.Administration of Mine Emergency Response, Mine Rescue Professional Committee. Analysis of mine emergency rescue cases. Beijing: China Coal Industry Publishing House; 2006.
14.Liang, Y. Analysis on the mine rescue teams’ own casualties. Saf Coal Mines. 2003;34:46-48.
15.Mine Rescue Professional Committee, Mine Rescue Substation. Compilation of mine rescue teams’ own casualties. Pingdingshan, China: Yu Internal Data Zhunyintongzi Pingwenguan No. 91-51; 1990.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Li et al. supplementary material
Li et al. supplementary material

 Word (33 KB)
33 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed