Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:53:55.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI.—The Morphology and. Development of the Free-swimming Sporosacs of the Hydroid Genus Dicoryne (including Heterocordyle)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

J. H. Ashworth  and
James Ritchie
J. H. Ashworth
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
James Ritchie
Affiliation:
Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hitherto there has been described only a single species—Dicoryne conferta (Alder)—amongst the Hydrozoa in which the reproductive body is a sporosac which becomes ciliated and free-swimming. We have found that another species which, as we shall show (pp. 269–271), must be named Dicoryne conybearei gives rise to reproductive bodies of this type, which, however, differ from those of Dicoryne conferta in several important respects. The free-swimming type of sporosac has not been the subject of close observation since 1872; we have therefore made as complete a study of the structure and development of the sporosacs, especially of D. conybearei, as material gathered from several sources would permit.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , 1916 , pp. 257 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Works Quoted

Allman, J. G., 1860, “Note on the Structure and Terminology of the Reproductive System in the Corynidæ and Sertularidæ,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (3), vol. vi, pp. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allman, J. G., 1861, “Notes on the Hydroid Zoophytes,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (3), vol. viii, pp. 168–173.Google Scholar
Allman, J. G., 1871–1872, “A Monograph of the Gymnoblastic or Tubularian Hydroids,” London, Ray Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnevie, K., 1898, “Zur Systematik der Hydroiden,” Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., Jahrg. 63, pp. 465–495.Google Scholar
Carlgren, O., 1909, “Die Tetraplatien,” in Wissens. Ergeb. deutsch. Tiefsee-Expedit. “Valdivia,” 1898–1899, Jena, vol. xix, pt. 3.Google Scholar
Chun, C., 1896, “Cœlenterata,” in Bronn's, Klassen u. Ord. des Thier-Reichs, Bd. ii, Abt. 2.Google Scholar
Delage, Y., et Hérouard, E., 1901, “Les Cœlentérés,” in Traité de Zoologie concrète, t. ii, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Gerd, W., 1892, “Zur Frage über die Keimblätterbildung bei den Hydromedusen,” Zool. Anz., vol. xv, pp. 312–316.Google Scholar
Goette, A., 1907, “Vergleichende Entwicklungsgeschichte der Geschlechtsindividuen der Hydropolypen,” Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., Bd. lxxxvii, pp. 1–335.Google Scholar
Harm, K., 1902, “Die Entwicklungsgeschichte von Clava squamata,” Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., Bd. lxxiii, pp. 115–166.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1897, “Die Hydromedusen Helgolands,” Wiss. Meeresunters. deutsch. Meere, pp. 449–536.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1868 [1869], A History of the British Hydroid Zoophytes, London, 2 vols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemna, A., 1908, “Morphologie des Cœlentérés,” Ann. Soc. roy. Zool. Malacol. Belgique, t. xliii, pp. 229–337.Google Scholar
Kühn, A., 1910, “Die Entwicklung der Geschlechtsindividuen der Hydromedusen,” Zool. Jahrb., Anat. u. Ontog., Bd. xxx, pp. 43–174.Google Scholar
Weismann, A., 1883, Die Entstehung der Sexualzellen bei-den Hydromedusen, Jena.Google Scholar