Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:25:45.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XVII.—The Endodermis in Light-grown and Etiolated Shoots of the Leguminosæ: A Contribution to the Causal Study of Differentiation in the Plant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

G. Bond
G. Bond
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Botany (Carnegie Teaching Fellow), University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twelve years ago Priestley and Ewing (1923) reported that in certain plants, normally showing but little development of stem-endodermis, an extensive formation of this layer could be induced by etiolation. (Note: In this paper the term endodermis is used only when the layer shows characteristic structural features—in the present case the Casparian strip.) A later paper by Priestley (1926) dealt with the same subject. The specified plants with which this result was obtained consisted of four closely related species, namely, Vicia Faba, V. sativa*, Pisum sativum, and Lens esculenta*, and also Solanum tuberosum. (The statements relating to the species marked with an asterisk are based on unpublished work carried out at Leeds, kindly placed at the author's disposal by Professor J. H. Priestley.) In these plants a primary endodermis, though present only at the base of the normal shoot, was described as extending to a considerable height in the etiolated shoot. It was concluded that the absence of endodermis from the greater part of the shoot of these plants, when grown under normal conditions, arises from the inoperation, in the presence of light, of the mechanism forming the Casparian strip.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , 1935 , pp. 409 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Barton-Wright, E. C., 1930. Recent Advances in Plant Physiology, London.Google Scholar
Bond, G., 1931. “The Stem-Endodermis in the Genus Piper,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvi, pp. 695–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylius, G., 1913. “Das Polyderm,” Bibl. Bot., Bd. xviii, Hft. 79.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. H., 1925. “Light and Growth. I. The Effect of Brief Light Exposure upon Etiolated Plants,” New Phyt., vol. xxiv, pp. 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, J. H., 1926. “Light and Growth. II. On the Anatomy of Etiolated Plants,” New Phyt., vol. xxv, pp. 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, J. H., and Ewing, J., 1923. “Physiological Studies in Plant Anatomy. VI. Etiolation,” New Phyt., vol. xxii, pp. 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoday, D., 1933. “Some Physiological Aspects of Differentiation,” New Phyt., vol. xxxii, pp. 274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, G., 1932–1933. “A Study of the Foliar Endodermis in the Plantaginaceæ,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvii, pp. 523–546.Google Scholar
Tupper-Carey, R. M., and Priestley, J. H., 1923. “The Composition of the Cell-wall at the Apical Meristem of Stem and Root,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. xcv, pp. 109–131.Google Scholar
Willis, J. C., 1919. Flowering Plants and Ferns, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar