Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-j5sqr Total loading time: 2.132 Render date: 2022-10-05T09:09:43.116Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

University Education and English Ecclesiastical Lawyers 1400–1650

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Richard Helmholz
Affiliation:
Ruth Wyatt Rosenson Professor of Law, University of Chicago

Abstract

Most recent historians have expressed a negative opinion of the quality of legal education at the English universities between 1400 and 1650. The academic study of law at Oxford and Cambridge, they have stated, was easy, antiquated and impractical. The curriculum had not changed from the form it assumed in the thirteenth century, and it did little to prepare students for their careers. This article challenges that opinion by examining the inner nature of the ius commune, the law that was applied in the courts of the church, and also by examining some of the works of practice compiled by English civilians during the period. Those works show that the negative opinion rests in part upon a misunderstanding of the nature of legal practice during earlier centuries. In fact, concentration on the texts of the Roman and canon laws, as old-fashioned as it seems to us, was well suited for the tasks advocates and judges would face once they left the academy. It also provided the stimulus needed for advance in the law of the church itself; their legal education made available to potential advocates and judges skills that would permit a sophisticated application of the ius commune, one better suited to their times. The article provides evidence of how this happened.1

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This is the text of the Eighth Lyndwood Lecture delivered at the Church of St Lawrence Jewry, Guildhall, London on 23 November 2010 under the auspices of the Ecclesiastical Law Society and the Canon Law Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

2 Stone, L ‘The size and composition of the Oxford student body, 1580–1910’ in Stone, L (ed), The University in Society (Princeton, NJ, 1974)Google Scholar, I, p 3; Allmand, C, ‘The Civil Lawyers’ in Clough, C (ed), Profession, Vocation and Culture in Later Medieval England (Liverpool, 1982), pp 155180Google Scholar.

3 An English language periodical established in 1981 devoted to the subject has had only one article related to legal education in its thirty year history. That exception was a useful one: Morrissey, T, ‘The Art of Teaching and Learning Law: a late medieval tract,’ (1989) 8 History of Universities 2774Google Scholar. An up–to–date survey covering the medieval period is provided in Brundage, J, The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: canonists, civilians, and courts (Chicago, 2008), pp 219282CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 This is not a peculiarly English problem. Some of the difficulties of the subject are discussed for the medieval period in Belloni, A, ‘L'insegnamento giuridico nelle università Italiane’, in Gargan, L and Limone, O (eds), Luoghi e metodi di insegnamento nell'Italia medioevale (Galatina, 1989), pp 143152Google Scholar.

5 Barton, J, ‘The Faculty of Law’ in McConica, J (ed), History of the University of Oxford, III, The Collegiate University (Oxford, 1986), pp 257293Google Scholar, at p 275. See also Charlton, K, Education in Renaissance England (London and Toronto, 1965), pp 138140Google Scholar.

6 Prest, W, William Blackstone: law and letters in the eighteenth century (Oxford, 2008), p 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Hobbins, D, ‘The Schoolman as Public Intellectual,’ (2003) 108 American Historical Review 1308–1337, at p 1313Google Scholar. See also Fletcher, J, ‘Change and resistance to change: a consideration of the development of English and German universities during the sixteenth century,’ (1981) 1 History of Universities 136Google Scholar; Maitland, F, Roman Canon Law in the Church of England (London, 1898), pp 9798Google Scholar, describing the law faculties of Oxford and Cambridge as ‘singularly unproductive of anything that could be called original work’.

8 Rashdall, H, The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 1936)Google Scholar, III, p 168.

9 Levack, B, The Civil Lawyers in England 1603–1641 (Oxford, 1973), p 16Google Scholar. See also O'Day, R, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Civilians’ in The Professions in Early Modern England, 1450–1800 (Haslow, 2000), pp 158159Google Scholar.

10 Coing, H, ‘L'ensegnamento del diritto nell'Europa dell'Ancien Régime’ in (1970) 82 Studi Senesi 179193Google Scholar, at 180.

11 See, eg, Worby, S, Law and Kinship in Thirteenth-century England (London, 2010), pp 2829Google Scholar.

12 The potential effects of ‘aggression’ by the common lawyers on aspiring students of the civil law are apparent in Scott, E (ed), Letter-Book of Gabriel Harvey, AD 1573–1580 (Camden Society, ns, 33, 1884), p 164Google Scholar.

13 See Braun, A, Giudici e Accademia nell'esperienza inglese (Bologna, 2006), pp 3639Google Scholar; Curtis, M, Oxford and Cambridge in Transition 1558–1642 (Cambridge, 1959), pp 158159Google Scholar; Costello, W, The Scholastic Curriculum at Early Seventeenth-century Cambridge (Cambridge, MA, 1958), pp 135141CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mullinger, J, A History of the University of Cambridge (London, 1888), pp 106107Google Scholar.

14 See, eg, Wijffels, A, ‘A seventeenth century English commentary “De regulis iuris” (D. 50.17)’, in Condorelli, O (ed), Panta rei. Studi dedicati a Manlio Bellomo V (Rome, 2004), pp. 473–96Google Scholar.

15 The evidence is summarised by Outhwaite, R, The Rise and Fall of the English Ecclesiastical Courts, 1500–1860 (Cambridge, 2006), pp 1522Google Scholar.

16 The following abbreviations to the repositories where the records are now kept have been used:

BI

Borthwick Institute of Historical Research, York

BL

British Library, London

Bodl

Bodleian Library, Oxford

CUL

Cambridge University Library

DUL

University of Durham, Palace Green Library

LMA

London Metropolitan Archives (records formerly at Guildhall)

LPL

Lambeth Palace Library, London

NNRO

Norfolk and Norwich Record Office, Norwich

WORO

Worcestershire Record Office, Worcester

17 The largest collection known to me is that of the lectures of Alberico Gentili in the Bodleian Library; see Simmonds, K, ‘The Gentili manuscripts,’ (1959) 76 Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Rom Abt 3452Google Scholar.

18 See Wijffels, A, ‘Disputations en droit à l'Université de Cambridge sous le règne élisabéthain,’ (2000) 57 Mémoires de la Société pour l'histoire du droit et des institutions des anciens pays bourguignons, comtois et romands 113130Google Scholar; Baker, J, 750 Years of Law at Cambridge (Cambridge, 1996), pp 67Google Scholar.

19 For an overview of medieval literature, see Owen, D, The Medieval Canon Law: teaching, literature and transmission (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar.

20 See, eg, Thomas Eden's Notebook (ca 1610), BI, MS Prec Bk 11.

21 Baker, J, Legal Education in London, 1250–1850 (Selden Society Lecture, 2007), p 11Google Scholar.

22 Eg, Lectures on the first book of the Decretals (early 15th century), Bodl, New Coll MS 192.

23 Eg, Lectures of Alberico Gentili (ca 1590), Bodl, D'Orville MS 606, f 4v, citing opinion of Bartolus, and f 10, citing opinion of Panormitanus.

24 Lecture notes of Robert Blemell (17th century), Trinity Hall Library, Cambridge, MS 27, pp 6, 37–40.

25 Eg, Student's Notebook (ca 1600), WORO, 794.093 BA 2470 (Collectanea ‘A’), f 63: ‘Et iste est modus formandi verum libellum’, also including principles and references to commentators. See also Student's Notebook (17th century), BL, Harl MS 3190, f 29, dealing with contents necessary in a libel when the boundary of land from which praedial tithes were due was uncertain.

26 See Gordley, J, ‘Ius quaerens intellectum: the method of the medieval civilians’ in Cairns, J and de Plessis, P (eds), The Creation of the Ius Commune: from casus to regula (Edinburgh, 2010), pp 77101Google Scholar; Brundage, J, The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession (Chicago, IL, 2008), pp 249254CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Michael Stolleis, ‘Corpus iuris civilis par coeur’ in Haferkamp, H and Repgen, T (eds), Usus Modernus Pandectarum: römisches Recht, deutsches Recht und Naturrecht in der frühen Neuzeit (Cologne, 2007), pp 245269Google Scholar.

27 Archbishop of York c Dean and Chapter of Durham (ca 1580), in Collections of Sir Julius Caesar, BL Lansd MS 135, f 74v, citing C 6.33.3 and Philippus Decius (d 1536 or 1537), Commentaria ad id.

28 Gurling c Gurling (Arches 1597), in Bodl, Tanner MS 427, fols 42–42v, citing X 2.13.13 and Joannes Antonio de Sancto Gregorio (d 1507), Commentaria super quarto decretalium at X 4.19.1.

29 Earl and Countess of Rutland c Alsop (c 1670), All Souls College Library, Oxford, MS 230 (no foliation), citing D 32.1.39(37), and Bartolus, Commentaria ad id, adding also more recent authorities from commentators on the civil law.

30 These sources of were endorsed by the law itself; see D 1.3.32, X 1.2.6, and the commentators thereupon. An example from practice is found in a civilian's notebook, ca 1600, LMA (records formerly at Guildhall), MS 11448, f 41v: ‘By the custome of England a nuncupative will revoketh a written will though the civill texte be otherwise’.

31 BL, Lansd MS 132, f 129: ‘Textus est expressus’, citing D 28.1.20 and rejecting argument that a legatee might serve as a witness to the execution of a last will and testament.

32 A preliminary account of the education of proctors can be found in my ‘The education of English proctors, 1400–1640’ in Bush, J and Wijffels, A (eds), Learning the Law: Teaching and the transmission of law in England 1150–1900 (London and Rio Grande, 1999), pp 191210Google Scholar.

33 For treatments of the current state of understanding of ths subject, see Wieacker, F, History of Private Law in Europe, Weir, T (trans), (Oxford, 1995), pp 159167Google Scholar; Eisenhardt, U, Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte (fourth edition, Munich, 2004), pp 171179Google Scholar; Schioppa, A Padoa, Storia del diritto in Europa: dal medioevo all'età contemporanea (Bologna, 2007), pp 279281Google Scholar.

34 Lyndwood, W, Provinciale (seu Constitutiones Angliae) (Oxford, 1679), p 347Google Scholar, v crimen, glossing the word crimen to show the possibility of expanding the scope of the English remedy for defamation beyond imputations of crimes commonly prosecuted in the courts. See B Ferme, ‘William Lyndwood and the Provinciale: Canon law in an undivided Western Church’, (1997) 4 Ecc LJ 615–628.

35 For the possibilities, see Schröder, J, Recht als Wissenschaft: Geschichte der juristischen Methode vom Humanismus bis zur historischen Schule (1500–1850) (Munich, 2001), pp 5674Google Scholar.

36 37 Hen VIII, c 17 (1545).

37 Opinion on the subject was divided among the civilians themselves; see the ‘humble position of the Doctors of the Arches (temp Car II), in Trumbull collection, BL Add MS 24104, f 36, complaining about the appointment of legally unqualified judges to act in the consistory courts.

38 A similar example is nicely described in K Homfray, ‘Sir Edward Coke gets it wrong? A brief history of consecration’, (2009) 11 Ecc LJ 36–50.

39 Handley c Redhead (Durham 1584), in Clement Colmore's Book, DUL, MS DDR/XVIII/3, f 127.

40 D 1.14.3.

41 See Civilian's Notebook (ca 1630), CUL, Collect Adm 38, f 46; Dr Barwell's Case (c 1610), in Thomas Eden's Notebook, BI, Prec Bk 11, f 21, also acknowledging differences of opinion on the subject.

42 Council of Oxford, [c 5] (1222), in F Powicke and C Cheney (eds), Councils & Synods with Other Documents Relating to the English Church II, AD 1205–1313 (Oxford, 1964), I, p 107.

43 See, eg, R Smolla, Law of Defamation (second edition, St Paul, MN, 2010), pp 70–89, at 84.

44 The question was of contemporary moment; see Civilian's Notebook, NNRO, DN/PCD/2/2, f 17; Annotations to Innocent IV, Apparatus in libros Decretalium, Hereford Cathedral Library, MS P.VIII.10, f 172: ‘[I]n quibus casibus criminalibus potest intervenire procurator?’ See also Ex officio c Owen (ca 1600), Bodl, Tanner MS 427, f 11; Anon (ca 1610), BI, Prec Bk 11, f 19; Anon (ca 1600), LMA, MS 11448, f 46.

45 See ‘Adversaria studentis in iure civili’ (17th century), BL, Harl MS 3190, f 47v. Other texts were also used in some arguments: eg, C 9.2.2, allowing a slave owner to intervene when the slave was accused of a capital crime; Decretum Gratiani, C 5 q 3 c3, allowing bishops to appear before a synod by proctor if detained by grave necessity.

46 D 48.1.13: ‘Ad crimen iudicii publici persequendum frustra procurator intervenit; multoque magis ad defendendum: sed excusationes absentium ex Senatus consulto iudicibus allegantur’. See, eg, Simon van Leeuwen (d 1682), Censura forensis (Amsterdam, 1685), Pt II, Lib II, c 2, nos 4–5: ‘[R]ectius alii distinguunt ut procurator admittatur ad innocentiam rei ostendendam, non ad causam legitimo modo peragendam, cum defensio juris sit naturalis, quae nemini est deneganda, arg l 33 §2, ff. de procuratoribus’. The parallel text from the Codex (C 9.2.3) was also cited and treated accordingly.

47 C 4.21.20(19); more detail is contained in my Origin of holographic wills in English law’, (1994) 15 Journal of Legal History, 97108CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also ‘Civil lawyer's commonplace book’, Columbia Law School Library, New York City, MS C/73, v comparison of hands.

48 They were quite cautious about accepting holographic wills, notably Henry Swinburne (d 1624), Briefe Treatise of Testaments and Last Willes (London, 1590)Google Scholar, Pt IV §25, nos 8–9. A text from the Authenticum (Coll VIII, tit 3), dealing with imperfect testaments inter liberos, was also relevant and mentioned by Swinburne.

49 C 7.14.5; see, eg, Caesar Contardus (fl 1570), ‘Commentarii in l Diffamari’, c 3, nos 168–70, in Tractatus sive Repetitiones super lex diffamari C de ingenuis manumissis (Cologne, 1593).

50 This point was made to me by Professor Norman Doe, and I thank him for it. He thinks the parallels are more exact than I do.

51 Graves, R, Recollections of Some Particulars in the Life of the Late William Shenstone (London, 1788), p 26nGoogle Scholar. See also Rashdall, Universities (above note 7), III, p 441: ‘The life of the virtuous student has no annals’.

1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

University Education and English Ecclesiastical Lawyers 1400–1650
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

University Education and English Ecclesiastical Lawyers 1400–1650
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

University Education and English Ecclesiastical Lawyers 1400–1650
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *