Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-6jg5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T08:38:11.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching irregular words: What we know, what we don’t know, and where we can go from here

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2020

Danielle Colenbrander Open the ORCID record for Danielle Colenbrander [Opens in a new window] ,
Hua-Chen Wang ,
Tara Arrow  and
Anne Castles
Danielle Colenbrander*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Macquarie University Centre for Reading, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Hua-Chen Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Macquarie University Centre for Reading, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Tara Arrow
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Macquarie University Centre for Reading, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Anne Castles
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Macquarie University Centre for Reading, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Danielle Colenbrander, Email: danielle.colenbrander@mq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

Instruction in regular letter-sound relationships is a key element of teaching children to read. However, in the English language, many words have irregular spellings (e.g. said, are, yacht). What is the best way to help children learn to read these words? To date, a number of different viewpoints have been put forward, but these viewpoints are seldom directly compared, and there is very little empirical evidence to adjudicate between them. Therefore, in this review, we outline the theoretical arguments for and against different methods of instruction, and synthesise the empirical research that does exist. We make recommendations for practice, and outline key areas where further evidence is required.

Keywords

irregular wordsreading instructionreadingprimary school

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , December 2020 , pp. 97 - 104
Copyright
© Australian Psychological Society Ltd, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Archer, A., Flood, J., Lapp, D., & Lungren, L. (2002). Phonics for reading. Curriculum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Bowers, J.S., & Bowers, P.N. (2017). Beyond phonics: The case for teaching children the logic of the English spelling system. Educational Psychologist, 52, 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P.N., Kirby, J.R., & Deacon, S.H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179.10.3102/0034654309359353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, Y.M., & Doctor, E.A. (1995). Developmental surface dyslexia: A case study of the efficacy of a remediation programme. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 69–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browder, D.M., & Xin, Y.P. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32, 130–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsdon, R., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2005). Treatment of irregular word spelling in developmental surface dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 213–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). On the relationship between morphological and phonological awareness: Effects of training in kindergarten and in first-grade reading. First Language, 29, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Larsen, L., Jones, P., Saunders, S., & McArthur, G. (2009). Assessing the basic components of reading: A revision of the Castles and Coltheart test with new norms. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 14, 67–88.10.1080/19404150902783435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A. (2012a, November 11). Irregular words? Spelfabet. https://www.spelfabet.com.au/2012/11/irregular-words/ Google Scholar
Clarke, A. (2012b, July 31). Teaching sight words. Spelfabet. https://www.spelfabet.com.au/2012/07/teaching-sight-words Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills. (2007). Letters and sounds: Principles and practice of high quality phonics. Notes of guidance for practitioners and teachers. U.K. Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/letters-and-sounds Google Scholar
Devonshire, V., Morris, P., & Fluck, M. (2013). Spelling and reading development: The effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction, 25, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, H., Best, W., Solity, J., & Hulme, C. (2017). Training mispronunciation correction and word meanings improves children’s ability to learn to read words. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 392–407.10.1080/10888438.2017.1315424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theories, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L.C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., de Jong, P.F., Houter, D., & Nielsen, A.-M. (2012). From spelling pronunciation to lexical access: A second step in word decoding? Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 341–359.10.1080/10888438.2011.568556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galuschka, K., Ise, E., Krick, K., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 9, Article e89900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, A.P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, A.P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilte, M., & Reitsma, P. (2006). Spelling pronunciation and visual preview both facilitate learning to spell irregular words. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 301–318.10.1007/s11881-006-0013-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearns, D.M., Rogers, H.J., Koriakin, T., & Al Ghanem, R. (2016). Semantic and phonological ability to adjust recoding: A unique correlate of word reading skill? Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 455–470.10.1080/10888438.2016.1217865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., & Coltheart, M. (2010). Skill generalisation in teaching spelling to children with learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15, 115–129.10.1080/19404158.2010.502588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Brunsdon, R. (2008). Predicting generalization in the training of irregular-word spelling: Treating lexical spelling deficits in a child. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 343–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovett, M.W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S.L. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 458–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyster, S.-A.H. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing, 15, 261–294.10.1023/A:1015272516220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, G., Castles, A., Kohnen, S., Larsen, L., Jones, K., Anandakumar, T., & Banales, E. (2015). Sight word and phonics training in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArthur, G., Kohnen, S., Jones, K., Eve, P., Banales, E., Larsen, L., & Castles, A. (2015). Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: A randomised controlled trial. PeerJ, 3, Article e922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArthur, G., Sheehan, Y., Badcock, N.A., Francis, D.A., Wang, H.-C., Kohnen, S., … Castles, A. (2018). Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagy, W.E., & Anderson, R.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institutes of Health. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/smallbook Google Scholar
Potter, D. (2012, February 16). Sight words. Blend Phonics. http://blendphonics.org/?page_id=765 Google Scholar
Savage, R., Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., & Maiorino, K. (2018). Preventative reading interventions teaching direct mapping of graphemes in texts and set-for-variability aid at-risk learners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22, 225–247.10.1080/10888438.2018.1427753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L.R., & Solity, J. (2016). Differing effects of two synthetic phonics programmes on early reading development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 182–203.10.1111/bjep.12097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solity, J., & Vousden, J. (2009). Real books vs reading schemes: A new perspective from instructional psychology. Educational Psychology, 29, 469–511.10.1080/01443410903103657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steacy, L.M., Elleman, A.M., Lovett, M.W., & Compton, D.L. (2016). Exploring differential effects across two decoding treatments on item-level transfer in children with significant word reading difficulties: A new approach for testing intervention elements. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 283–295.10.1080/10888438.2016.1178267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart, M., Masterson, J., & Dixon, M. (2000). Spongelike acquisition of sight vocabulary in beginning readers? Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 12–27.10.1111/1467-9817.00099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (2012). Does set for variability mediate the influence of vocabulary knowledge on the development of word recognition skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 122–140.10.1080/10888438.2010.542527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venezky, R.L. (1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wang, H.-C., Castles, A., Nickels, L., & Nation, K. (2011). Context effects on orthographic learning of regular and irregular words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, H.-C., Nickels, L., Nation, K., & Castles, A. (2013). Predictors of orthographic learning of regular and irregular words. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 369–384.10.1080/10888438.2012.749879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipke, M. (2016). The importance of flexibility of pronunciation in learning to decode: A training study in set for variability. First Language, 36, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar