Skip to main content
×
×
Home

From pause to word: uh, um and er in written American English 1

  • GUNNEL TOTTIE (a1)
Abstract

This article describes and discusses the appearance and increasing frequency of uh, um and er in American English journalistic prose from the 1960s to the early 2000s as part of the colloquialization of the language. The three variants uh, um and er are shown to have different uses in writing than in speech; in writing they can be shown to qualify as words, while their status in speech appears to be on a cline of wordhood. In writing, they belong to the class of stance adverbs, serving metalinguistic purposes. Two types are distinguished, depending on sentence placement: in initial position, uh, um and er are attitude adverbs and in medial position, they are style adverbs. Although er is dispreferred in initial position and preferred for correction of previously used words, every variant can be used for all discourse-pragmatic functions, which supports classifying them as one lexeme.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
1

I thank two anonymous reviewers and editor Bernd Kortmann for constructive criticism and advice. I am also deeply grateful to Laurie Bauer, Sebastian Hoffmann, Christine Johansson and Antoinette Renouf, for reading and commenting on earlier versions, and to members of the English seminars of the Universities of Uppsala and Stockholm for helpful discussions. I thank Mark Davies for patiently answering questions about corpora, Hans-Martin Lehmann for technical help, Nils-Lennart Johannesson for discussion of statistics, and Christoph Rühlemann and Nathalie Dion for assistance with figures. My special thanks go to Philip Shaw, who not only read an earlier version and provided examples from the web but who helped shape my thinking about the word-formation process. Remaining inadvertencies are my own responsibility.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aitchison J. 2012. Words in the mind, 4th edn. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
Aijmer Karin & Rühlemann Christoph (eds.). 2015. Corpus pragmatics: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ameka Felix. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18, 101–18.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language , 5th edn. 2016. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Biber Douglas, Johansson Stig, Leech Geoffrey, Conrad Susan & Finegan Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Brinton Laurel & Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter Ronald & McCarthy Michael. 2006. The Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide to spoken and written English grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christenfeld Nicholas. 1995. Does it hurt to say UM? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 19, 171–86.
Clark Herbert H. & Tree Jean E. Fox. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84, 73111.
Davies Mark. 2007–. TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words: 1920s-2000s. http://corpus.byu.edu/time/ (accessed December 2015).
Davies Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ (accessed September 2016).
Davies Mark. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English. http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/
Edmondson Willis. 1981. Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman.
Erard Michael. 2007. Um . . . slips, stumbles, and verbal blunders, and what they mean. New York: Pantheon Books.
Finegan Edward. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivization: An introduction. In Stein Dieter & Wright Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer Kerstin. 2006. Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. In Fischer Kerstin (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 427–47. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Götz Sandra. 2013. Fluency in native and nonnative English speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grieve Jack, Nini Andrea & Guo Diansheng. 2016. Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online. English Language and Linguistics 16, 129.
Howell Richard W. & Vetter Harold J.. 1969. Hesitation in the production of speech. Journal of General Psychology 4, 261–76.
Huddleston Rodney & Pullum Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hundt Marianne & Mair Christian. 1999. ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4, 221–42.
Jucker Andreas. 2015a. Uh and um as planners in the Corpus of Historical American English. In Taavitsainen Irma, Kytö Merja, Claridge Claudia & Smith Jeremy (eds.), Developments in English: Expanding electronic evidence, 162–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jucker Andreas. 2015b. Pragmatics of fiction: Literary uses of uh and um . Journal of Pragmatics 86, 6367.
Leech Geoffrey & Fallon Roger. 1992. Computer corpora – what do they tell us about culture? ICAME Journal 16, 2950.
Leech Geoffrey, Hundt Marianne, Mair Christian & Smith Nick. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maclay Howard & Osgood Charles E.. 1959. Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word 15, 1944.
McArthur Tom. 1992. The Oxford companion to the English language. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Mey Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics, 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Norrick Neal R. 2015. Interjections. In Aijmer & Rühlemann (eds.), 291–325.
O'Connell Daniel C. & Kowal Sabine. 2005. Uh and Um revisited: Are they interjections for signaling delay? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34, 555–76.
Oxford English Dictionary. OED online . March 2017. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry (accessed 1 April 2017).
Quirk Randolph, Greenbaum Sidney, Leech Geoffrey & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Roget's international thesaurus , 6th edn. 2001. Ed. Kipfer Barbara Ann. New York: HarperResource.
Rose Ralph. 2011. Filled pauses in writing: What can they teach us about speech? Poster presented at the ‘Production and Comprehension of Conversational Speech’ workshop, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Rühlemann Christoph & Hilpert Martin. To appear. Colloquialization in journalistic writing: The case of inserts with a focus on well. Journal of Historical Pragmatics.
Sacks Harvey, Schegloff Emanuel & Jefferson Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696735.
The Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English . www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/research/santa-barbara.corpus (accessed July 2016).
Shillcock Richard, Kirby Simon, McDonald Scott & Brew Chris. 2001. Filled pauses and their status in the mental lexicon. Paper presented at DiSS 01 (Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech), 29–31 August 2001, Edinburgh.
Tottie Gunnel. 2011. Uh and um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16, 173–96.
Tottie Gunnel. 2014. On the use of uh and um in American English. Functions of Language 21, 629.
Tottie Gunnel. 2015a. Turn management and ‘filled pauses’, uh and um. In Aijmer & Rühlemann (eds.), 448–93.
Tottie Gunnel. 2015b. Uh and um in British and American English: Are they words? Evidence from co-occurrence with pauses. In Dion Nathalie, Lapierre André & Cacoullos Rena Torres (eds.), Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theory, 3854. New York: Routledge.
Tottie Gunnel. 2016. Planning what to say: Uh and um among the pragmatic markers. In Kaltenböck Günther, Lohmann Arne & Keizer Evelien (eds.), Outside the clause, 97102. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Tottie Gunnel. Forthcoming. Uh and um in word-search in spoken language.
Tottie Gunnel & Hoffmann Sebastian. 2009. Tag questions as markers of stance in written English. In Bowen Rhonwen, Mobärg Mats & Ohlander Sölve (eds.), Corpora and discourse – and stuff: Papers in honour of Karin Aijmer (Gothenburg Studies in English 96), 305–15. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Wilkins David P. 1992. Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18, 119–58.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 31
Total number of PDF views: 108 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 270 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th September 2017 - 25th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.