Skip to main content Accessibility help

Reduced deforestation and the carbon market: the role of market regulations and future commitments

  • Niels Anger (a1), Alistair Dixon (a2) and Erich Livengood (a3)

Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) has been proposed as an economic and extensive source of emission abatement to supplement other long-term climate policies. However, critics suggest an excess supply of REDD credits may disrupt emerging carbon markets and raise north–south equity concerns. In this context, we investigate the economic implications of REDD regulations and future emissions reduction commitments. Numerical model simulations show that unrestricted exchange of REDD units reduces the international carbon price by half and cuts compliance costs by roughly one-third. Developed nations’ requirements for policy supplementarity, which restrict demand for REDD credits, reduce such price impacts but go at the expense of both economic efficiency and benefits to rainforest areas. Instead, unlimited REDD access facilitates climate policy targets to be tightened by almost a quarter at constant compliance cost, tripling the environmental ambition of the Kyoto Protocol and providing considerable wealth transfers to developing countries.

Hide All
Angelsen, A. (2008), ‘Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options, and implications’, Bogor: Cifor, [Available at]
Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D. (1999), ‘Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models’, World Bank Research Observer 14(1): 7398.
Anger, N. (2008), ‘Emissions trading beyond Europe: linking schemes in a Post-Kyoto world’, Energy Economics 30(4): 20282049.
Anger, N. and Sathaye, J. (2008), ‘Reducing deforestation and trading emissions: economic implications for the post-Kyoto carbon market’, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 08-016, Mannheim.
Antinori, C. and Sathaye, J. (2007), ‘Assessing transaction costs of project-based greenhouse gas emissions trading’, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Formal Report LBNL-57315, Berkeley, CA.
Böhringer, C. and Rutherford, T.F. (2002), ‘Carbon abatement and international spillovers’, Environmental and Resource Economics 22(3): 391417.
Böhringer, C., Hoffmann, T., Lange, A., Löschel, A., and Moslener, U. (2005), ‘Assessing emission allocation in Europe: an interactive simulation approach’, Energy Journal 26(4): 122.
Cabezas, P.P. and Keohane, N. (2008), ‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD): implications for the carbon market’, White paper. Environmental Defense Fund, New York.
Caparrós, A., Ovando, P., Oviedo, J.L., and Campos, P. (2010), ‘Accounting for carbon in avoided degradation and reforestation programmes in Mediterranean forests’, Environment and Development Economics 16: 405428.
Trust, Carbon (2009), ‘Global carbon mechanism. Emerging lessons and implications’, London: Carbon Trust [Available at]
Combes Motel, P., Pirard, R., and Combes, J.-L. (2009), ‘A methodology to estimate impacts of domestic policies on deforestation: compensated successful efforts for “avoided deforestation” (REDD)’, Ecological Economics 68(3): 680691.
Council of the European Union (2007), ‘Brussels European Council, 8/9 March 2007, Presidency Conclusions’, 2 May 2007, Brussels, [Available at]
Criqui, P., Mima, S., and Viguier, L. (1999), ‘Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model’, Energy Policy 27(10): 585601.
Ebeling, J. and Yasué, M. (2008), ‘Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363(1498): 19171924.
Eliasch, J. (2008), Climate Change: Financing Global Forests: The Eliasch Review, United Kingdom Office of Climate Change (OCC), London.
Commission, European (2008), ‘Addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss’, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 17 October 2008, Brussels.
European Union (2008), ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system of the Community’, Communication COM(2008) 30 final, European Commission, Brussels.
FAO (2005), State of the World's Forests, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome: FAO.
Fukuda, Y. (2008), Speech to Japan National Press Club outlining “Fukuda vision: in pursuit of a low carbon society”, 14 June 2008.
Garnaut, R. (2008), The Garnaut Climate Change Review: Final Report, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Government of Canada (2008), ‘Turning the corner: Regulatory Framework for Industrial Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, Ottawa: Government of Canada.
Grieg-Gran, M. (2008), ‘The cost of avoiding deforestation’, London: International Institute for Environment and Development, [Available at]
Gupta, S. and Tirpak, D.A. (2007), ‘Polices, instruments and co-operative arrangements’ in Metz, B. et al. . (eds), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Contributions of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Chapter 13, Box 12.7; IPCC, AR4 Synthesis Report 2007, Topic 5, Table 5.1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2000), Emissions Scenarios: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klepper, G. and Peterson, S. (2006), ‘Emissions trading, CDM, JI, and more: the climate strategy of the EU’, Energy Journal 27(2): 126.
Michaelowa, A. and Dutschke, M. (2009), ‘Will credits from avoided deforestation in developing countries jeopardize the balance of the carbon market?’, in Palmer, C. and Engel, S. (eds), Avoided Deforestation: Prospects for Mitigating Climate Change. Routledge Explorations in Environmental Economics, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 130148.
Obama, B. and Biden, J. (2008), ‘Promoting a healthy environment’, [Available at]
Ojha, V.P. (2009), ‘Carbon emissions reduction strategies and poverty alleviation in India’, Environment and Development Economics 14(3), 323348.
Sathaye, J., Makundi, W., Dale, L., Chan, P., and Andrasko, K. (2005), ‘Estimating global forestry GHG mitigation potential and costs: a dynamic partial equilibrium approach’, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Formal Report LBNL-55743, Berkeley, CA.
Sathaye, J., Makundi, W., Dale, L., Chan, P., and Andrasko, K. (2006), ‘GHG mitigation potential, costs and benefits in global forests: a dynamic partial equilibrium approach’, Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy Special Issue: 95124.
Schmidt, L. (2009), ‘REDD from an integrated perspective: considering overall climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation and equity issues’, Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.
Sohngen, B. and Mendelsohn, R. (2003), ‘An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2): 448457.
Tavoni, M., Sohngen, B., and Bosetti, V. (2007), ‘Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate’, Energy Policy 35(11): 53465353.
van Vuuren, D, Lucas, P., and Hilderink, H. (2006), ‘Downscaling drivers of global environmental change scenarios: enabling use of the IPCC SRES scenarios at the national and grid level’, Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (MNP).
Weyant, J.P. and Hill, J. (1999), ‘Introduction and overview’, Energy Journal, special issue on the Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: a Multi-model Evaluation: viixliv.
WWF (2009), ‘Getting ready for REDD: toward an effective and equitable policy on international forest carbon’, World Wildlife Fund Report, January 2009.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environment and Development Economics
  • ISSN: 1355-770X
  • EISSN: 1469-4395
  • URL: /core/journals/environment-and-development-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Anger supplementary material

 PDF (68 KB)
68 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed