Skip to main content
×
Home

Detecting (trans)gene flow to landraces in centers of crop origin: lessons from the case of maize in Mexico

  • David A. Cleveland (a1), Daniela Soleri (a1), Flavio Aragón Cuevas (a2), José Crossa (a3) and Paul Gepts (a4)...
Abstract

There is much discussion of the probability of transgene flow from transgenic crop varieties to landraces and wild relatives in centers of origin or diversity, and its genetic, ecological, and social consequences. Without costly research on the variables determining gene flow, research on transgene frequencies in landrace (or wild relative) populations can be valuable for understanding transgene flow and its effects. Minimal research requirements include (1) understanding how farmer practices and seed systems affect landrace populations, (2) sampling to optimize Ne/n (effective /census population size), (3) minimizing variance at all levels sampled, and (4) using Ne to calculate binomial probabilities for transgene frequencies. A key case is maize in Mexico. Two peer-reviewed papers, based on landrace samples from the Sierra Juárez region of Oaxaca, Mexico, reached seemingly conflicting conclusions: transgenes are present (Quist and Chapela, 2001, Nature 414: 541–543; 2002, Nature 416: 602) or “detectable transgenes” are absent (Ortiz-García et al., 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 12338–12343 and 18242). We analyzed these papers using information on Oaxacan maize seed systems and estimates of Ne. We conclude that if Quist and Chapela’s results showing presence are accepted, Ortiz-García et al.’s conclusions of no evidence of transgenes at detectable levels or for their introgression into maize landraces in the Sierra de Juárez of Oaxaca are not scientifically justified. This is because their samples are not representative, and their statistical analysis is inconclusive due to using n instead of Ne. Using estimates of Ne based on Ortiz-García et al.’s n, we estimate that transgenes could be present in maize landraces in the Sierra Juárez region at frequencies of ~1–4%, and are more likely to be present in the 90% of Oaxacan landrace area that is not mountainous. Thus, we have no scientific evidence of maize transgene presence or absence in recent years in Mexico, Oaxaca State, or the Sierra Juárez region.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Detecting (trans)gene flow to landraces in centers of crop origin: lessons from the case of maize in Mexico
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Detecting (trans)gene flow to landraces in centers of crop origin: lessons from the case of maize in Mexico
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Detecting (trans)gene flow to landraces in centers of crop origin: lessons from the case of maize in Mexico
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
cleveland@es.ucsb.edu
References
Hide All
[1] Altman D, Bland JM (1995) Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Brit. Med. J. 311: 485
[2] Alvarez-Morales A (2000) Mexico: Ensuring environmental safety while benefiting from biotechnology. In Persley GJ and Lantin MM, eds, Agricultural biotechnology and the poor: proceedings of an international conference, Washington, D.C., 21-22 October 1999. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, DC
[3] Alvarez-Morales A (2002) Transgenes in maize landraces in Oaxaca: official report on the extent and implications. http://www.bba.de/gentech/isbgmo.pdf (posted 2002 Oct 10-16; verified 2006 Jan 24)
[4] Andow DA (2003) Negative and positive data, statistical power, and confidence intervals. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 16
[5] Aragón Cuevas F, Taba S, Castro-García FH, Hernández-Casillas JM, Cabrera-Toledo JM, Alcalá LO, Ramírez ND (2005) In situ conservation and use of local maize races in Oaxaca, Mexico: a participatory and decentralized approach. In Taba S ed, Latin American maize germplasm conservation: regeneration, in situ conservation, core subsets, and prebreeding; proceedings of a workshop held at CIMMYT, April 7-10, 2003. CIMMYT, Mexico
[6] Ballinas V, Becerril A (2005) Aprueba el senado la ley de bioseguirdad, pese a deficiencias, La Jornada, México
[7] Baltazar BM, Sanchez-Gonzalez JD, de la Cruz-Larios L, Schoper JB (2005) Pollination between maize and teosinte: an important determinant of gene flow in Mexico. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110: 519526
[8] Baltazar BM, Schoper JB (2002) Crop-to-crop gene flow: dispersal of transgenes in maize during field tests and commercialization. Paper presented at the 7th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, Oct 10-16, 2002, Beijing, China. http://www.worldbiosafety.net/ (posted 2002 Oct 10-16; verified 2006 Jan 24)
[9] Berthaud J, Gepts P (2004) Chapter three: Assessment of effects on genetic diversity. In: Maize and biodiversity: The effects of transgenic maize in Mexico. Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America http://www.cec.org/files/PDF//Maize-Biodiversity-Chapter3_en.pdf (verified 2006 Jan 7)
[10] CEC (2004) Maize and biodiversity: the effects of transgenic maize in Mexico. Key findings and recommendations. Secretariat article 13 report. CEC. http://www.cec.org/files/PDF//Maize-and-Biodiversity_en.pdf (verified 2004 Nov 10)
[11] Cleveland DA, Soleri D (2005) Rethinking the risk management process for GE crops in Third World agriculture. Ecol. Soc. 10: Article 9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art9/
[12] Crossa J, Vencovsky R (1994) Implication of the variance in effective population size on the genetic conservation of monoecious species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 936942
[13] Crossa J, Hernandez CM, Bretting P, Eberhart SA, Taba S (1993) Statistical genetic considerations for maintaining germ plasm collections. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 673678
[14] Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York
[15] Ellstrand NC (2003) Dangerous liaisons? When cultivated plants mate with their wild relatives. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
[16] Esteva G, Marielle C, eds (2003) Sin maíz no hay país. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, Dirección General de Culturas Populares e Indígenas, México
[17] Gepts P, Papa R (2003) Possible effects of (trans)gene flow from crops on the genetic diversity from landraces and wild relatives. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 89103
[18] Hall L, Topinka K, Huffman J, Davis L (2000) Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers. Weed Sci. 48: 688694
[19] Hartl DL, Clark AG (1989) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts
[20] Hernandez CM, Crossa J (1993) A program for estimating the optimum sample-size for germplasm conservation. J. Hered. 84: 8586
[21] Huang JK, Hu RF, Rozelle S, Pray C (2005) Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers’ fields: Assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science 308: 688690
[22] INEGI (1996) Anuario Estadístico del Estado de Oaxaca, Edición 1996. INEGI, Aguascalientes, Mexico
[23] INEGI (2004) Sistema para la consulta del anuario estadístico de Oaxaca, Edicion 2004. http://www.inegi.gob.mx/est/contenidos/espanol/sistemas/aee04/estatal/oax/index.htm (verified 2005 Oct 8)
[24] Jarosz N, Loubet B, Durand B, McCartney A, Foueillassar X, Huber L (2003) Field measurements of airborne concentration and deposition rate of maize pollen. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 119: 3751
[25] Kaiser J (2005) Calming fears, no foreign genes found in Mexico's maize. Science 309: 1000
[26] Kaplinsky N, Braun D, Lisch D, Hay A, Hake S, Freeling M (2002) Maize transgenic results in Mexico are artefacts. Nature 416: 601
[27] Louette D, Charrier A, Berthaud J (1997) In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ. Bot. 51: 2038
[28] Lu BR, Snow AA (2005) Gene flow from genetically modified rice and its environmental consequences. Bioscience 55: 669678
[29] Ma BL, Subedi KD, Reid LM (2004) Extent of cross-fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids. Crop Sci. 44: 12731282
[30] Marris E (2005) Four years on, no transgenes in Mexican maize. Nature 436: 760
[31] Marshall DR, Brown AHD (1975) Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation. In Frankel OH and Hawkes JG eds, Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp 53–80
[32] Matsuoka Y, Vigouroux Y, Goodman MM, Sanchez GJ, Buckler E, Doebley J (2002) A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 60806084
[33] Metz M, Fütterer J (2002) Suspect evidence of transgenic contamination. Nature 416: 600601
[34] Nature Biotechnology (2002) Editorial: Going with the flow. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 527
[35] NRC (2002) Environmental effects of transgenic plants: the scope and adequacy of regulation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
[36] NRC (2004) Biological confinement of genetically engineered organisms, Washington, DC
[37] Ortiz-García S, Ezcurra E, Schoel B, Acevedo F, Soberón J, Snow AA (2005a) Absence of detectable transgenes in local landraces of maize in Oaxaca, Mexico (2003-2004). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 1233812343
[38] Ortiz-García S, Ezcurra E, Schoel B, Acevedo F, Soberón J, Snow AA (2005b) Correction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 18242
[39] Papa R, Acosta J, Delgado-Salinas A, Gepts P (2006) A genome-wide analysis of differentiation between wild and domesticated Phaseolus vulgaris from Mesoamerica. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 11471158
[40] Paulson KM (2005) Found-and-lost: transgenic maize in Oaxaca, Mexico. Information Systems for Biotechnology http://www.isb.vt.edu/news/2005/news05.nov.htm#nov0502 (verified 2005 Nov 07)
[41] Peregrina K, Crúz J (2005) Mexico approves planting and sale of GM crops. Source: SciDev.Net. http://www.scidev.net/News/index.cfm?fuseaction=readNews&itemid=1945&language=1 (verified 2006 Jan 24)
[42] Prakash CS (2005) Duh.... No GM genes in Mexican corn. AgBioWorld. http://www.agbioworld.org/newsletter_wm/index.php?caseid=archive&newsid=2398 (verified 2005 Aug 25)
[43] Pressoir G, Berthaud J (2004) Population structure and strong divergent selection shape phenotypic diversification in maize landraces. Heredity 92: 95101
[44] Quist D, Chapela IH (2001) Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 414: 541543
[45] Quist D, Chapela IH (2002) Quist and Chapela reply. Nature 416: 602
[46] Raven PH (2005) Transgenes in Mexican maize: desirability or inevitability? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 1300313004
[47] Raynor GS, Ogden EC, Hayes JV (1972) Dispersion and deposition of corn pollen from experimental sources. Agron. J. 64: 420
[48] Savidan A (2002) Tritrophic interactions in maize storage systems. Institute of Zoology, Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Entymology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, p 225
[49] Serratos JA, Willcox MC, Castillo-González F, eds (1997) Gene flow among maize landraces, improved maize varieties and teosinte: implications for transgenic maize. CIMMYT, Mexico
[50] Snow AA, Andersen B, Jorgensen RB (1999) Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B-rapa. Mol. Ecol. 8: 605615
[51] Snow AA, Pilson D, Rieseberg LH, Paulsen MJ, Pleskac N, Reagon MR, Wolf DE, Selbo SM (2003) A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecol. Appl. 13: 279286
[52] Soleri D, Smith SE, Cleveland DA (2000) Evaluating the potential for farmer and plant breeder collaboration: a case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico. Euphytica 116: 4157
[53] Soleri D, Cleveland DA, Aragón Cuevas F, Ríos Labrada H, Fuentes Lopez MR, Sweeney SH (2005) Understanding the potential impact of transgenic crops in traditional agriculture: maize farmers' perspectives in Cuba, Guatemala & Mexico. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 141166
[54] Soleri D, Cleveland DA, Aragón Cuevas F (2006) Transgenic crop varieties and varietal diversity in traditionally based agriculture: the case of maize in Mexico. Bioscience 56: 503513
[55] Uitenbroek DG (1997) “SISA-Binomial”. http://home.clara.net/sisa/binomial.htm (verified 2006 Jan 09)
[56] Velasco CE (2005) El maíz criollo de Oaxaca, libre de contaminación genética: cientificos, La Jornada, México
[57] Vencovsky R, Crossa J (1999) Variance effective population size under mixed self and random mating with applications to genetic conservation of species. Crop Sci. 39: 1282– 1294
[58] Vencovsky R, Crossa J (2003) Measurements of representativeness used in genetic resources conservation and plant breeding. Crop Sci. 43: 19121921
[59] Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97159
[60] Zi X (2005) GM rice forges ahead in China amid concerns over illegal planting. Nat. Biotechnol. 23: 637
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Biosafety Research
  • ISSN: 1635-7922
  • EISSN: 1635-7930
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-biosafety-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 72 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 107 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.