Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-j7tnp Total loading time: 0.21 Render date: 2021-08-03T11:05:52.210Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Cost of carnivore coexistence on communal and resettled land in Namibia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2013

N. A. RUST
Affiliation:
Cheetah Conservation Fund, PO Box 1755, Otjiwarongo, Namibia
L. L. MARKER
Affiliation:
Cheetah Conservation Fund, PO Box 1755, Otjiwarongo, Namibia
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Summary

Human-wildlife conflict is detrimental to the conservation of threatened carnivores and the livelihoods of rural communities. This paper compares perceived levels of human-carnivore conflict experienced on five Namibian communal conservancies and four resettled farming areas. Factors explored include how reported depredation was affected by livestock husbandry practices, the perceived annual cost of depredation and the reported problem predator species. Of the 147 respondents interviewed, perceived depredation was greater than in previous studies; high perceived depredation was associated with greater rates of predator removal, increased ranking of predators as problems and increased predator sighting frequency. Small stock species were the most commonly depredated livestock. The most frequently perceived predators were: jackals on goats and sheep, wild cats on chickens, leopards on horses and spotted hyenas on cattle. The financial cost of this predation was US$508898, mostly attributable to cattle depredation, and agricultural training schemes recommending good livestock management may help reduce this cost. A move from small to large stock farming could be promoted in areas with an abundance of small- to medium-sized carnivores and a lack of large carnivores. Further incentives, such as meat provision and income from consumptive and non-consumptive tourism could ensure benefits outweigh costs of wildlife coexistence.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angula, H.K. (2006) Namibia Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2003/2004. Windhoek, Namibia: Namibia Statistics Agency.Google Scholar
Asheim, L.J. & Mysterud, I. (2004) Economic impact of protected large carnivores on sheep farming in Norway. Sheep and Goat Research Journal 19: 8996.Google Scholar
Balme, G.A. (2009) The conservation biology of a nominally protected leopard population. PhD thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville, South Africa.Google Scholar
Balme, G.A., Slotow, R. & Hunter, L.T.B. (2009) Impact of conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a persecuted leopard (Panthera pardus) population. Biological Conservation 142: 26812690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, S., Shyamsundar, P., Wang, L. & Humavindu, M. N. (2004) Do households gain from community-based natural resource management? An evaluation of community conservancies in Namibia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3337, Windhoek, Namibia.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A. (2000) The economic costs of wildlife predation on livestock in Gokwe communal land, Zimbabwe. African Journal of Ecology 38: 2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CANAM (2010) The Conservancy Association of Namibia (CANAM): An Overview of Freehold Conservancies, ed. Shaw, D. & Marker, L. L.. Windhoek, Namibia: CANAM.Google Scholar
Coertze, R.D. (1986) Livestock in the social and cultural life of African communities. South African Journal of Ethnology 9: 129135.Google Scholar
Dar, N.I., Minhas, R.A., Zaman, Q. & Linkie, M. (2009) Predicting the patterns, perceptions and causes of human–carnivore conflict in and around Machiara National Park, Pakistan. Biological Conservation 142: 20762082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickman, A.J. (2005) An assessment of pastoralist attitudes and wildlife conflict in the Rungwa-Ruaha region, Tanzania, with particular reference to large carnivores. MSc thesis. Biodiversity, Conservation and Management, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK: 95 pp.Google Scholar
Dickman, A.J., Macdonald, E.A. & Macdonald, D.W. (2011) A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108: 1393713944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durant, S.M. (1998) Competition refuges and coexistence: an example from Serengeti carnivores. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 370386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2009) FAO/WFP Crop, Livestock and Food Security Assessment Mission to Namibia. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and World Food Programme.Google Scholar
Frank, L.G. (1998) Living with lions: carnivore conservation and livestock in Laikipia District, Kenya. Report. Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya.Google Scholar
Gadd, M.E. (2005) Conservation outside of parks: attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya. Environmental Conservation 32: 5063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusset, M., Swarner, M.J., Mponwane, L., Keletile, K. & McNutt, J.W. (2009) Human–wildlife conflict in northern Botswana: livestock predation by endangered African wild dog Lycaon pictus and other carnivores. Oryx 43: 6772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M.W., Hofmeyr, M., Brien, J.O. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2006) Prey preferences of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) (Felidae: Carnivora): morphological limitations or the need to capture rapidly consumable prey before kleptoparasites arrive? Journal of Zoology 270: 615627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henghali, J.N. (2006) Conservation attitudes and patterns of biodiversity loss in the Ohangwena and Oshikoto Regions of Namibia. Masters thesis, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.Google Scholar
Howery, L.D. & Deliberto, T. J. (2004) Indirect effects of carnivores on livestock foraging behavior and production. Sheep and Goat Research Journal 19: 5357.Google Scholar
Ikanda, D. & Packer, C. (2008) Ritual vs. retaliatory killing of African lions in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania. Endangered Species Research 6: 6774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, N. (2004) Economic impacts of livestock depredation by snow leopard Uncia uncia in the Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, Nepal Himalaya. Environmental Conservation 31: 322330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R.M., Ahlborn, G.G., Gurung, M. & Ale, S.B. (1996) Reducing livestock depredation losses in the Nepalese Himalaya. In: 17th Vertebrate Pest Conference, ed. Timm, R.M. & Crabb, A.C., pp. 241247. Davis, CA, USA: University of California.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.N., Isaac, J.L. & Fisher, D.O. (2007) Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proceedings. Biological sciences/The Royal Society 274: 341–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaunda, S.K.K. & Skinner, J. D. (2003) Black-backed jackal diet at Mokolodi Nature Reserve, Botswana. African Journal of Ecology 41: 3946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissui, B.M. (2008) Livestock predation by lions, leopards, spotted hyenas, and their vulnerability to retaliatory killing in the Maasai steppe, Tanzania. Animal Conservation 11: 422432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, O.B. (1996) Diet composition of different carnivores in the Free State, South Africa. South African Journal Of Science 92: 393398.Google Scholar
Kolowski, J.M. & Holekamp, K.E. (2005) Spatial, temporal, and physical characteristics of livestock depredations by large carnivores along a Kenyan reserve border. Biological Conservation 8: 529541.Google Scholar
Lindsey, P.A., Du Toit, J.T. & Mills, M.G.L. (2005) Attitudes of ranchers towards African wild dogs Lycaon pictus: Conservation implications on private land. Biological Conservation 125: 113121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnell, J.D.C., Nilsen, E.B., Lande, U.S., Herfindal, I., Odden, J., Skogen, K., Andersen, R. & Breitenmoser, U. (2005) Zoning as a means of mitigating conflicts with large carnivores: principles and reality. In: People and Wildlife Conflict or Coexistence, ed. Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S.J. & Rabinowitz, A.R., pp. 162175. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, F. (2004) Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9: 247257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marker, L.L. (2002) Aspects of cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) biology, ecology and conservation strategies on Namibian farmlands. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Marker, L.L., Dickman, A. & Schumann, M. (2005) Using livestock guarding dogs as a conflict resolution strategy on Namibian farms. Carnivore Damage Prevention News 8: 2832.Google Scholar
Marker, L.L., Mills, M.G.L. & Macdonald, D.W. (2003) Factors influencing perceptions of conflict and tolerance toward cheetahs on Namibian farmlands. Conservation Biology 17: 12901298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NASCO (2010) Namibia's Communal Conservancies: A review of progress. Report. Namibian Association of Community Based Natural Resource Management Support Organisations (NASCO), Windhoek, Namibia.Google Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. (1997) Farming the forest edge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Geographical Review 87: 2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowell, K. & Jackson, P. (1996) Wild cats: status survey and conservation action plan. Report. World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Ogada, M.O., Woodroffe, R., Oguge, N.O. & Frank, L.G. (2003) Limiting depredation by African carnivores: the role of livestock husbandry. Conservation Biology 17: 15211530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prugh, L.R., Stoner, C.J., Epps, C.W., Bean, W.T., Ripple, W.J., Laliberte, A.S. & Brashares, J.S. (2009) The rise of the mesopredator. BioScience 59: 779791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, G.S.A. (1999) Livestock predation by the painted hunting dog Lycaon pictus in a cattle ranching region of Zimbabwe: a case study. Biological Conservation 88: 133139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robel, R.J., Dayton, A.D., Henderson, F.R., Meduna, R.L. & Spaeth, C.W. (1981) Relationships between husbandry methods and sheep losses to canine predators. Journal of Wildlife Management 45: 894911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romañach, S.S., Lindsey, P.A. & Woodroffe, R. (2007) Determinants of attitudes towards predators in central Kenya and suggestions for increasing tolerance in livestock dominated landscapes. Oryx 41: 185195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagor, J.T., Swenson, J.E. & Roskaft, E. (1997) Compatability of brown bear Ursus arctos and free-ranging sheep in Norway. Biological Conservation 81: 9195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiess-Meier, M., Ramsauer, S., Gabanapelo, T. & König, B. (2007) Livestock predation: insights from problem animal control registers in Botswana. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 12671274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, M. (2003) Raising a guarding dog: success or failure? Cheetah Conservation Fund Newsletter 19: 78.Google Scholar
Selebatso, M., Moe, S.R. & Swenson, J.E. (2008) Do farmers support cheetah Acinonyx jubatus conservation in Botswana despite livestock depredation? Oryx 42: 430436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, A.B., Fuller, T.K., Damery, D.T., Sievert, L. & Marker, L.L. (2010) Farm management and economic analyses of leopard conservation in north-central Namibia. Animal Conservation 13: 419427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, P.A., Candy, A., Sillero-Zubiri, C. & Leader-Williams, N. (2001) Impact of livestock and settlement on the large mammalian wildlife of Bale Mountains National Park, southern Ethiopia. Biological Conservation 100: 307322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddart, L.C., Griffiths, R.E. & Knowlton, F.F. (2001) Coyote responses to changing jackrabbit abundance affect sheep predation. Journal of Range Management 54: 1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorn, M., Green, M., Dalerum, F., Bateman, P.W. & Scott, D.M. (2012) What drives human–carnivore conflict in the North West Province of South Africa? Biological Conservation 150: 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Schalkwyk, D.L., McMillin, K.W., Witthuhn, R.C. & Hoffman, L.C. (2010) The contribution of wildlife to sustainable natural resource utilization in Namibia: a review. Sustainability 2: 34793499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, L.C. & Skyer, P. (2003) Conservancies: integrating wildlife land-use options into the livelihood, development, and conservation strategies of Namibian communities. In: Animal Health and Development Forum, pp. 140. Durban, South Africa: The Vth World Parks Congress.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, R. & Ginsberg, J.R. (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280: 21262128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodroffe, R., Frank, L.G., Lindsey, P.A., ole Ranah, S.M. & Romañach, S. (2006) Livestock husbandry as a tool for carnivore conservation in Africa's community rangelands: a case–control study. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 12451260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodroffe, R., Lindsey, P.A., Romañach, S.S., Stein, A. & ole Ranah, S.M. (2005) Livestock predation by endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in northern Kenya. Biological Conservation 124: 225234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wywialowski, A.P. (1994) Producers’ perceptions of agricultural wildlife-caused losses. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22: 370382.Google Scholar
Yirga, G. & Bauer, H. (2010) Livestock depredation of the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) in Southern Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Journal of Ecology 36: 6773.Google Scholar
17
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cost of carnivore coexistence on communal and resettled land in Namibia
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Cost of carnivore coexistence on communal and resettled land in Namibia
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Cost of carnivore coexistence on communal and resettled land in Namibia
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *