Skip to main content
×
Home

Assessing visitors’ preferences for ecosystem features in a desert biodiversity hotspot

  • CLAUDIA CERDA (a1), JUAN PABLO FUENTES (a1), CARMEN LUZ DE LA MAZA (a1), CARLA LOUIT (a2) and ANA ARAOS (a1)...
Summary
SUMMARY

We estimated visitors’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a variety of environmental attributes in a protected area of the Atacama Desert, a biodiversity hotspot in northern Chile. By using a choice experiment, WTP was estimated for the protection of the following attributes: animals (mammals, amphibians, reptiles and birds), pollinating insects, plants (cacti and woody shrubs), soil quality and pristine landscapes. Visitors placed economic value on all of the attributes. The marginal mean WTP/visitor for the single levels of variation in the attributes ranged from US$4 (for supporting research on foxes) to US$26 (for maintaining soil quality) per visitor per month. These results can contribute to deciding which attributes are likely to be successful at raising funds for conservation. Our approach may be relevant to protected areas of the world with high conservation values, little funding and a lack of large, charismatic species.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Claudia Cerda email: claudcerda@gmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All
Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000200
Footnotes
References
Hide All
Barrena J., Nahuelhual L., Báez A., Schiappacasse I. & Cerda C. (2014) Valuing cultural ecosystem services: agricultural heritage in Chiloé Island, southern Chile. Ecosystem Services 7: 6675.
Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroglu E. & Pearce D.W. (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Technique: A Manual. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing House.
Buffa F. (2015) Young tourists and sustainability. Profiles, attitudes, and implications for destination strategies. Sustainability 7: 1404214062.
Carson R.T. & Louviere J.J. (2011) A common nomenclature for stated preference elicitation approaches. Environmental and Resource Economics 49: 539559.
Cerda C. & Losada T. (2013) Assessing the value of species: a case study on the willingness to pay for species protection in Chile. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185: 1047910493.
Cerda C., Barkmann J. & Marggraf R. (2013a) Application of choice experiments to quantify the existence value of an endemic moss: a case study in Chile. Environment and Developing Economies 18: 207224.
Cerda C., Ponce A. & Zappi M. (2013b) Using choice experiments to understand public demand for the conservation of nature: a case study in a protected area of Chile. Journal for Nature Conservation 21: 143153.
Cerda C., Barkmann J. & Marggraf R. (2014) Non-market economic valuation of the benefits provided by temperate ecosystems at the extreme south of the Americas. Regional Environmental Change 14: 15171531.
Cerda C. & De la Maza C.L. (2015) Evaluación de Servicios Ecosistémicos Proporcionados por Áreas Protegidas: Implicancias para Áreas Protegidas Chilenas. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Gráfica Metropolitana.
Di Minin E., Fraser I., Slotow R. & MacMillan D.C. (2013a) Understanding heterogeneous preference of tourists for big game species: implications for conservation and management. Animal Conservation 16: 249258.
Di Minin E., Fraser I., Slotow R. & MacMillan D.C. (2013b) Conservation marketing and education for less charismatic biodiversity and conservation businesses for sustainable development. Animal Conservation 16: 263264.
Domínguez-Torreiro M. & Soliño M. (2011) Provided and perceived status quo in choice experiments: implications for valuing the outputs of multifunctional rural areas. Ecological Economics 70: 25232531.
Duarte M., Guerrero P.C., Carvallo G. & Bustamante R.O. (2014) Conservation network design for endemic cacti under taxonomic uncertainty. Biological Conservation 176: 236242.
Espinosa M., Cepeda A., Louit C., Meléndez M. & González-Maya J. (2014) Pampas cat Leopardus colocolo in the Atacama Desert: first records from Llanos de Challe National Park, Chile. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural 63: 111118.
González B.A., Palma R.E., Zapata B. & Marín J.C. (2006) Taxonomic and biogeographical status of guanaco Lama guanicoe (Artiodactyla, Camelidae). Mammal Review 36: 157178.
Hartter J., Solomon J., Ryan S.J. Jacobson S.K. & Goldman A. (2014) Contrasting perceptions of ecosystem services of an African forest park. Environmental Conservation 41: 330340.
Hausmann A., Slotow R., Fraser I. & Di Minin E. (2017). Ecotourism marketing alternative to charismatic megafauna can also support biodiversity conservation. Animal Conservation 20: 91100.
Hensher D., Rose J. & Greene W. (2005) Applied Choice Methods – A Primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jorquera-Jaramillo C. (2008) Agricultura y flora nativa en la Región de Atacama. ¿Es posible producir y conservar? In: Libro Rojo de la Flora Nativa y de los Sitios Prioritarios para su Conservación: Región de Atacama, vol. 17, eds. Squeo F.A., Arancio G. & Gutiérrez J.R., pp. 305322. La Serena, Chile: Ediciones Universidad de La Serena.
Karlen D.L. (2012) Soil health: the concept, its role, and strategies for monitoring. In: Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services, eds. Wall D.H., Bardgett R.D., Behan-Pelletier V., Herrick J.E., Helfin Jones T., Ritz K., Six J., Strong D.R. & van der Putten W.H., pp. 331336. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kotchen M.J. & Reiling S.D. (2000) Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics 32: 93107.
Krinsky I. & Robb A.L. (1986) On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 68: 715719.
Krutilla J. (1967) Conservation reconsidered. The American Economic Review 57: 777786.
Larridon I., Shaw K., Cisternas M.A., Paizanni Guillén A., Sharrock S., Oldfield S., Goetghebeur P. & Samain M. (2014) Is there a future for the Cactaceae genera Copiapoa, Eriosyce and Eulychnia? A status report of a prickly situation. Biodiversity and Conservation 23: 12491287.
Leader-Williams N. & Dublin H.T. (2000) Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’. In: Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity: Has the Panda Had its Day?, eds. Entwistle A. & Dunstone N., pp. 5381, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Loomis J., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K. & Covich A. (2000) Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 33: 103117.
Loomis J.B. & Larson D.M. (1994) Total economic values of increasing gray whale populations: results from a contingent valuation survey of visitors and households. Marine Resource Economics 9: 275286.
Loomis J.B. & White D.S. (1996) Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 18: 197206.
Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A. & Swait J.D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Aplications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Maciejewski K. & Kerley G.I.H. (2014) Understanding tourists’ preference for mammal species in private protected areas: is there a case for extralimital species for ecotourism? PLoS ONE 9: e88192.
Martín-López B., Montes C. & Benayas J. (2007) The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 139: 6782.
Pendergast D. (2010) Getting to know the Y generation. In: Tourism and Generation Y, eds. Benckendorff P., Moscardo G., & Pendergast D., pp. 115. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Ressurreição A., Gibbons J., Dentinho T.P., Kaiser M., Santos R.S. & Edwards-Jones G. (2011) Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea. Ecological Economics 70: 729739.
Skibins J.C., Powell R.B. & Hallo J.C. (2013) Charisma and conservation: charismatic megafauna's influence on safari and zoo tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors. Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 959982.
Tisdell C. & Wilson C. (2006) Information, wildlife valuation, conservation: experiments and policy. Contemporary Economic Policy 24: 144159.
Van Riper C.J., Manning R.E., Monz C.A. & Goonan K.A. (2011) Tradeoffs among resource, social, and managerial conditions on mountain summits of the Northern Forest. Leisure Sciences 33: 228249.
Veríssimo D., Fraser I., Groombridge J., Bristol R. & MacMillan D.C. (2009) Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands. Animal Conservation 12: 549558.
Zamin T.J., Baillie J.E.M., Miller R.M., Rodríguez J.P., Ardid A. & Collen B. (2010) National Red Listing beyond the 2010 target. Conservation Biology 24: 10121020.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 6

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 2

 Unknown (4.6 MB)
4.6 MB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 1

 Unknown (796 KB)
796 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 4

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 5

 Word (4.6 MB)
4.6 MB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 3

 Word (342 KB)
342 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 7

 Word (17 KB)
17 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 34 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 240 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 3rd April 2017 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.