Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Assessing visitors’ preferences for ecosystem features in a desert biodiversity hotspot

  • CLAUDIA CERDA (a1), JUAN PABLO FUENTES (a1), CARMEN LUZ DE LA MAZA (a1), CARLA LOUIT (a2) and ANA ARAOS (a1)...
Summary
SUMMARY

We estimated visitors’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a variety of environmental attributes in a protected area of the Atacama Desert, a biodiversity hotspot in northern Chile. By using a choice experiment, WTP was estimated for the protection of the following attributes: animals (mammals, amphibians, reptiles and birds), pollinating insects, plants (cacti and woody shrubs), soil quality and pristine landscapes. Visitors placed economic value on all of the attributes. The marginal mean WTP/visitor for the single levels of variation in the attributes ranged from US$4 (for supporting research on foxes) to US$26 (for maintaining soil quality) per visitor per month. These results can contribute to deciding which attributes are likely to be successful at raising funds for conservation. Our approach may be relevant to protected areas of the world with high conservation values, little funding and a lack of large, charismatic species.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Claudia Cerda email: claudcerda@gmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All
Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000200
Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

I.J. Bateman , R.T. Carson , B. Day , M. Hanemann , N. Hanley , T. Hett , M. Jones-Lee , G. Loomes , S. Mourato , E. Özdemiroglu & D.W. Pearce (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Technique: A Manual. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing House.

F. Buffa (2015) Young tourists and sustainability. Profiles, attitudes, and implications for destination strategies. Sustainability 7: 1404214062.

C. Cerda & T. Losada (2013) Assessing the value of species: a case study on the willingness to pay for species protection in Chile. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185: 1047910493.

C. Cerda , A. Ponce & M. Zappi (2013b) Using choice experiments to understand public demand for the conservation of nature: a case study in a protected area of Chile. Journal for Nature Conservation 21: 143153.

C. Cerda , J. Barkmann & R. Marggraf (2014) Non-market economic valuation of the benefits provided by temperate ecosystems at the extreme south of the Americas. Regional Environmental Change 14: 15171531.

E. Di Minin , I. Fraser , R. Slotow & D.C. MacMillan (2013a) Understanding heterogeneous preference of tourists for big game species: implications for conservation and management. Animal Conservation 16: 249258.

M. Domínguez-Torreiro & M. Soliño (2011) Provided and perceived status quo in choice experiments: implications for valuing the outputs of multifunctional rural areas. Ecological Economics 70: 25232531.

B.A. González , R.E. Palma , B. Zapata & J.C. Marín (2006) Taxonomic and biogeographical status of guanaco Lama guanicoe (Artiodactyla, Camelidae). Mammal Review 36: 157178.

A. Hausmann , R. Slotow , I. Fraser & E. Di Minin (2017). Ecotourism marketing alternative to charismatic megafauna can also support biodiversity conservation. Animal Conservation 20: 91100.

D.L. Karlen (2012) Soil health: the concept, its role, and strategies for monitoring. In: Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services, eds. D.H. Wall , R.D. Bardgett , V. Behan-Pelletier , J.E. Herrick , T. Helfin Jones , K. Ritz , J. Six , D.R. Strong & W.H. van der Putten , pp. 331336. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

I. Krinsky & A.L. Robb (1986) On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 68: 715719.

J. Loomis , P. Kent , L. Strange , K. Fausch & A. Covich (2000) Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 33: 103117.

J.B. Loomis & D.M. Larson (1994) Total economic values of increasing gray whale populations: results from a contingent valuation survey of visitors and households. Marine Resource Economics 9: 275286.

J.B. Loomis & D.S. White (1996) Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 18: 197206.

K. Maciejewski & G.I.H. Kerley (2014) Understanding tourists’ preference for mammal species in private protected areas: is there a case for extralimital species for ecotourism? PLoS ONE 9: e88192.

B. Martín-López , C. Montes & J. Benayas (2007) The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 139: 6782.

A. Ressurreição , J. Gibbons , T.P. Dentinho , M. Kaiser , R.S. Santos & G. Edwards-Jones (2011) Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea. Ecological Economics 70: 729739.

J.C. Skibins , R.B. Powell & J.C. Hallo (2013) Charisma and conservation: charismatic megafauna's influence on safari and zoo tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors. Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 959982.

C. Tisdell & C. Wilson (2006) Information, wildlife valuation, conservation: experiments and policy. Contemporary Economic Policy 24: 144159.

C.J. Van Riper , R.E. Manning , C.A. Monz & K.A. Goonan (2011) Tradeoffs among resource, social, and managerial conditions on mountain summits of the Northern Forest. Leisure Sciences 33: 228249.

T.J. Zamin , J.E.M. Baillie , R.M. Miller , J.P. Rodríguez , A. Ardid & B. Collen (2010) National Red Listing beyond the 2010 target. Conservation Biology 24: 10121020.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 6

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 2

 Unknown (4.6 MB)
4.6 MB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 1

 Unknown (796 KB)
796 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 4

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 5

 Word (4.6 MB)
4.6 MB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 3

 Word (342 KB)
342 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cerda supplementary material
Cerda supplementary material 7

 Word (17 KB)
17 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 28 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 190 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 3rd April 2017 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.