Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ho, Nga Thi Thanh Ross, Helen and Coutts, Jeffrey 2016. Evaluation of social and ecological outcomes of fisheries co-management in Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam. Fisheries Research, Vol. 174, p. 151.


    Islam, Durdana and Berkes, Fikret 2016. Can small-scale commercial and subsistence fisheries co-exist? Lessons from an indigenous community in northern Manitoba, Canada. Maritime Studies, Vol. 15, Issue. 1,


    Kocho-Schellenberg, John-Erik and Berkes, Fikret 2015. Tracking the development of co-management: using network analysis in a case from the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record, Vol. 51, Issue. 04, p. 422.


    Trimble, Micaela and Berkes, Fikret 2015. Towards adaptive co-management of small-scale fisheries in Uruguay and Brazil: lessons from using Ostrom’s design principles. Maritime Studies, Vol. 14, Issue. 1,


    Kosamu, Ishmael 2014. Conditions for Sustainability of the Elephant Marsh Fishery in Malawi. Sustainability, Vol. 6, Issue. 7, p. 4010.


    Gilmour, Patrick W. Dwyer, Peter D. and Day, Robert W. 2013. Enhancing the agency of fishers: A conceptual model of self-management in Australian abalone fisheries. Marine Policy, Vol. 37, p. 165.


    Sowman, M Scott, D Green, L J F Hara, M M Hauck, M Kirsten, K Paterson, B Raemaekers, S Jones, K Sunde, J and Turpie, J K 2013. Shallow waters: social science research in South Africa's marine environment. African Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 385.


    Llompart, FM Colautti, DC and Baigún, CRM 2012. Assessment of a major shore-based marine recreational fishery in the southwest Atlantic, Argentina. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 57.


    MCCLANAHAN, TIMOTHY R. ABUNGE, CAROLINE A. and CINNER, JOSHUA E. 2012. Heterogeneity in fishers' and managers' preferences towards management restrictions and benefits in Kenya. Environmental Conservation, Vol. 39, Issue. 04, p. 357.


    Evans, Louisa Cherrett, Nia and Pemsl, Diemuth 2011. Assessing the impact of fisheries co-management interventions in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 92, Issue. 8, p. 1938.


    Plummer, Ryan and Hashimoto, Atsuko 2011. Adaptive Co-Management and the Need for Situated Thinking in Collaborative Conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 222.


    Berkes, Fikret 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 90, Issue. 5, p. 1692.


    McClanahan, Timothy R. Castilla, Juan Carlos White, Alan T. and Defeo, Omar 2009. Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 33.


    Napier, V R Turpie, J K and Clark, B M 2009. Value and management of the subsistence fishery at Knysna Estuary, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 297.


    ×

Evaluating conditions for successful co-management of subsistence fisheries in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

  • VICTORIA R. NAPIER (a1), GEORGE M. BRANCH (a1) and JEAN M. HARRIS (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892905002195
  • Published online: 08 September 2005
Abstract

Conditions important for the success of co-management have repeatedly been identified, but their relative influence has not been quantitatively evaluated. To investigate the implementation of co-management in 11 subsistence fisheries within seven rural communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, perceptions of the responsible authorities and the fishing communities were surveyed. Of 16 conditions often considered important for the success of co-management, only nine were correlated with perceived success, the most strongly correlated being (1) benefits of co-management must exceed costs of participation, (2) training and empowerment, and (3) existence of a long-term ‘champion’ to drive the process. The perceptions of the authorities concurred with those of the communities with regards to the attainment of conditions, but views on the success of co-management differed significantly owing to disagreements that were specific to three particular fisheries. Both groups agreed that co-management is a viable improvement on top-down authoritarian imposition of regulations. However, it takes time to become effective; perceived success was directly correlated with how long individual programmes had been operating. Failure to devolve power from national government to local institutions, and delays in awarding subsistence permits, remain the major stumbling blocks to full realization of co-management.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Miss Victoria R. Napier Tel: +27 834 730229 Fax: +27 21 8581759 e-mail: vici_napier@mweb.co.za; gmbranch@egs.uct.ac.za
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: