Skip to main content Accessibility help

Interdisciplinarity in the environmental sciences: barriers and frontiers



Global environmental changes present unprecedented challenges to humans and the ecosystems upon which they depend. The need for interdisciplinary approaches to solve such multidimensional challenges is clear, however less clear is whether current attempts to cross disciplinary boundaries are succeeding. Indeed, efforts to further interdisciplinary approaches remain hampered by failures in assessing their scope and success. Here a set of measures examined the interdisciplinarity of the environmental sciences and tested two literature-based hypotheses: (1) newer and larger disciplines are more interdisciplinary; and (2) interdisciplinary research has lower impact factors than its counterparts. In addition, network analysis was used to map interdisciplinarity and determine the relative extent to which environmental science disciplines draw on alternative disciplinary perspectives. Contrary to expectations, age and size of a discipline had no effect on measures of interdisciplinarity for papers published in 2006, though metrics indicated larger articles and journals were more interdisciplinary. In addition, interdisciplinary research had a greater impact factor than its more strictly disciplinary peers. Network analysis revealed disciplines acting as ‘interdisciplinary frontiers’, bridging critical gaps between otherwise disparate subject areas. Whilst interdisciplinarity is complex, a combination of diversity metrics and network analysis provides valuable preliminary insights for interdisciplinary environmental research policy. The successful promotion of interdisciplinarity is needed to help dispel commonly perceived barriers to interdisciplinarity and create opportunities for such work by increasing the space available for different disciplines to encounter each other. In particular, the networks presented highlight the importance of considering disciplinary functioning within the wider context, to ensure maximum benefit to the scientific community as a whole.


Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Christina Hicks e-mail:


Hide All
Amaral, L.A.N. & Uzzi, B. (2007) Complex systems. A new paradigm for the integrative study of management, physical, and technological systems. Management Science 53 (7): 10331035.
Balsiger, P.W. (2004) Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale. Futures 36 (4): 407421.
Barry, A., Born, G. & Weszkalnys, G. (2008) Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37: 2049.
Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J.M. (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312 (5772): 431433.
Bordons, M., Morillo, F. & Gomez, I. (2004) Analysis of cross-disciplinary research through bibliometric tools. In: Handbook of Quantiative Science and Technology Research: the Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, pp. 437456. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. & Freeman, L.C. (2002) UCINET 6 For Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis [www document]. URL
Bornmann, L., Wallon, G. & Ledin, A. (2008) Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes. PLoS ONE 3 (10): e3480.
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.
Boyack, K., Klavans, R. & Börner, K. (2005) Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64 (3): 351374.
Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J. & Williams, R. (2004) Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures 36 (4): 457470.
Campbell, L.M. (2005) Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conservation Biology 19 (2): 574577.
Chapron, G. & Husté, A. L. (2009) Open, fair, and free journal ranking for researchers. Bioscience 56 (7): 558559.
Choi, B.C.K. & Pak, A.W.P. (2007) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 30: E224E232.
Clarke, K. & Warwick, R. (2001) Changes in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Second edition. Plymouth, UK: Plymouth Marine Lab and PRIMER-E.
Daily, G.C. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1999) Managing earth's ecosystems: An interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2 (4): 277280.
Dalgaard, T., Hutchings, N.J. & Porter, J.R. (2003) Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 100 (1): 3951.
Dogan, M. & Pahre, R. (1990) Scholarly reputation and obsolescence in the social sciences: innovation as a team sport. International Social Science Journal 42 (3): 417427.
Drews, J. (2000) Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science 287 (5460): 19601964.
Egghe, L. & Leydesdorff, L. (2009) The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 10271036.
Freeman, L. (1972) Segregation in social networks. Sociological Methods and Research 6: 411430.
Freeman, L. (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40 (1): 3541.
Freeman, L. (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks 1 (3): 215239.
Garfield, E. (2004) Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science 30 (2): 119145.
Heberlein, T. (1988) Improving interdisciplinary research: integrating the social and natural sciences. Society and Natural Resources 1 (1): 516.
HESA (2006) Joint Academic Coding System (JACS) Version 2. Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) and the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) [www document]. URL
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, ed. Pachauri, R.K. & Reisinger, A.. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
Jackson, R.B., Randerson, J.T., Canadell, J.G., Anderson, R.G., Avissar, R., Baldocchi, D.D., Bonan, G.B., Caldeira, K., Diffenbaugh, N.S., Field, C.B., Hungate, B.A., Jobbagy, E.G., Kueppers, L.M., Nosetto, M.D. & Pataki, D.E. (2008) Protecting climate with forests. Environmental Research Letters 3 (4): 5.
Jakobsen, C.H., Hels, T. & McLaughlin, W.J. (2004) Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (1): 1531.
Karlqvist, A. (1999) Going beyond disciplines. The meanings of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences 32 (4): 379383.
Klein, J. (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit, MI, USA: Wayne State University Press.
Klein, J.T. (2008) Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2): S116S123.
Klein, K.K., Smith, E.G. & Zentner, R.P. (1998) Interdisciplinary agricultural research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie 46 (3): 259272.
Kueffer, C., Hadorn, G. H., Bammer, G., van Kerkhoff, L. & Pohl, C. (2007) Towards a publication culture in transdisciplinary research. Gaia. Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 16 (1): 2226.
Lele, S. & Norgaard, R.B. (2005) Practicing interdisciplinarity. Bioscience 55 (11): 967975.
Levitt, J.M. & Thelwall, M. (2008) Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (12): 19731984.
Leydesdorff, L. (2007 a) Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (9): 13031319.
Leydesdorff, L. (2007 b) Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the science citation index and the social science citation index. Scientometrics 71 (3): 391405.
Leydesdorff, L. (2008) Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 278287.
Leydesdorff, L. & Rafols, I. (2009) A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (2): 348362.
Leydesdorff, L., de Moya-Anegón, F. & Guerrero-Bote, V.P. (2010) Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: a comparison with the journal citation reports of the ISI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (2): 352369.
Lowe, P. & Phillipson, J. (2006) Reflexive interdisciplinary research: the making of a research programme on the rural economy and land use. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (2): 165184.
Lowe, P. & Phillipson, J. (2009) Barriers to research collaboration across disciplines: scientific paradigms and institutional practices. Environment and Planning A 41 (5): 11711184.
Lowe, P., Whitman, G. & Phillipson, J. (2009) Ecology and the social sciences. Journal of Applied Ecology 46 (2): 297305.
MacMynowski, D.P. (2007) Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecology and Society 12 (1): 20 [www document]. URL
Mansilla, V.B. (2006) Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration. Research Evaluation 15 (1): 1729.
Mansilla, V.B., Feller, I. & Gardner, H. (2006) Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research and education. Research Evaluation 15 (1): 6974.
Max-Neef, M.A. (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53 (1): 516.
McAleece, N., Lambshead, P., Paterson, G. & Gage, J. (1997) BioDiversity Pro. A program for analysing ecological data. Natural History Museum, London, UK.
McWilliam, E., Hearn, G. & Haseman, B. (2008) Transdisciplinarity for creative futures: what barriers and opportunities? Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45 (3): 247253.
Meybeck, M. (2003) Global analysis of river systems: from Earth system controls to Anthropocene syndromes. Philosophical TransActions of the Royal Society London Series B – Biological Science 358 (1440): 19351955.
Michon, F. & Tummers, M. (2009) The dynamic interest in topics within the biomedical scientific community. PLoS ONE 4 (8): e6544.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ed. (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis [www document]. URL
Miller, T.R., Baird, T.D., Littlefield, C.M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F.S. & Redman, C.L. (2008) Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society 13 (2): 17.
Moed, H.F. (2005) Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures. Current Science 89 (12): 19901996.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M. & Gomez, I. (2001) An approach to interdisciplinarity bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 51 (1): 203222.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M. & Gomez, I. (2003) Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (13): 12371249.
Moya-Anegon, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Corera-Alvarez, E. & Munoz-Fernandez, F.J. (2004) A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics 61 (1): 129145.
OECD, ed. (1998) Interdisciplinarity in Science and Technology. Paris, France: OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
Olden, J.D. (2007) How do ecological journals stack-up? Ranking of scientific quality according to the h index. Ecoscience 14 (3): 370376.
Omenn, G.S. (2006) Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science 314 (5806): 16961704.
Pickett, S.T.A., Burch, W.R. & Grove, J.M. (1999) Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2 (4): 302307.
Pierce, S. (1999) Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 50 (3): 271279.
Porter, A.L. & Rafols, I. (2009) Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81 (3): 719745.
Pudovkin, A.I. & Garfield, E. (2002) Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53: 11131119.
Quinn, G. & Keough, M. (2002) Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rafols, I. & Leydesdorff, L. (2009) Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (9): 18231835.
Rhoten, D. & Parker, A. (2004) Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science 306 (5704): 20462046.
Rinia, E.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., Bruins, E.E.W., van Vuren, H.G. & van Raan, A.F.J. (2002 a) Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics 54 (3): 347362.
Rinia, E.J., Van Leeuwen, T.N. & Van Raan, A.F.J. (2002 b) Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics. Scientometrics 53 (2): 241248.
Rinia, E.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., van Vuren, H.G. & van Raan, A.F.J. (1998) Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria. Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands. Research Policy 27 (1): 95107.
Shinn, T. (1999) Change or mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales 38 (1): 149176.
Steele, T.W. & Stier, J.C. (2000) The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 (5): 476484.
Stirling, A. (2007) A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4 (15): 707719.
Strathern, M. (2006) A community of critics? Thoughts on new knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12 (1): 191209.
Todd, P.A., Guest, J.R., Lu, J. & Ming Chou, L. (2010) One in four citations in marine biology papers are inappropriate. Marine Ecology Progress Series doi: 10.3354/meps08587 (in press).
Tress, B., Tress, G. & Fry, G. (2005 a) Researchers’ experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environmental Management 36 (6): 792807.
Tress, G., Tress, B. & Fry, G. (2005 b) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 20 (4): 479493.
Turner, M.G. & Carpenter, S.R. (1999) Tips and traps in interdisciplinary research. Ecosystems 2 (4): 275276.
van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F., Tijssen, R.J.W., Visser, M.S. & van Raan, A.F.J. (2000) First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems. Research Evaluation 9 (2): 155156.
Walker, R., Moore, N.J., Arima, E., Perz, S., Simmons, C., Caldas, M., Vergara, D. & Bohrer, C. (2009) Protecting the Amazon with protected areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A 106 (26): 1058210586.
Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wey, T., Blumstein, D.T., Shen, W. & Jordan, F. (2008) Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour 75: 333344.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Hicks supplementary material
Hicks supplementary material

 Word (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB

Interdisciplinarity in the environmental sciences: barriers and frontiers



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.