Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The randomized response technique as a tool for estimating non-compliance rates in fisheries: a case study of illegal red abalone (Haliotis rufescens) fishing in Northern California

  • SARA G. BLANK (a1) and MICHAEL C. GAVIN (a2)

Illegal fishing has detrimental environmental and social impacts, but these effects are difficult to mitigate without reliable estimates of fisher non-compliance. Methods used by fisheries managers to estimate illegal fishing often require indirect estimation of poaching using biological, economic or sociological indicators. This study presents a unique application of the randomized response technique (RRT) for direct estimation of non-compliance in fisheries to the Northern California recreational red abalone (Haliotis rufescens) fishery. An anonymous paper-based compliance and sociodemographic survey of recreational fishers in Sonoma and Mendocino Counties estimated 29% non-compliance with the daily take limit, 23% with the minimum size limit, 19% with licensing laws and 15% with the annual take limit. RRT results also indicated how different sociodemographic characteristics related to non-compliance. Visitors had higher non-compliance rates than local fishers for all regulations except daily take limits, which an estimated 72% of locals violated versus 18% of visitors. High fisher awareness of regulations, fisher age, income and fishing experience did not appear to influence illegal take. RRT is a powerful tool which can aid conservation managers in prioritizing action.

Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Sara G. Blank Tel: +1 831 998 3831 e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R.P. Berrens , A.K. Bohara & J. Kerkvliet (1997) A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (1): 252266.

T.A. Buchman & J.A. Tracy (1982) Obtaining responses to sensitive questions: conventional questionnaire versus randomized response technique. Journal of Accounting Research 20 (1): 263271.

M.Y. Chaloupka (1985) Application of the randomized response technique to marine park management: an assessment of permit compliance. Environmental Management 9 (5): 393398.

T.A. Dowling & R.H. Shachtman (1975) Relative efficiency of randomized response models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70 (349): 8487.

H. Faasen & S. Watts (2007) Local community reaction to the `no-take’ policy on fishing in the Tsitsikamma National Park, South Africa. Ecological Economics 64 (1): 3646.

J.A. Fox & P.E. Tracy (1986) Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys. Beverly Hills, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

M.S. Goodstadt & V. Gruson (1975) The randomised response technique: a test on drug use. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 814818.

M. Harris (1998) Lament for an Ocean: The Collapse of the Atlantic Cod Fishery. Toronto, Canada: McLelland and Stuart.

A. Hatcher , S. Jaffry , O. Thebaud & E. Bennett (2000) Normative and social influences affecting compliance with fishery regulations. Land Economics 76 (3): 448461.

M. Hauck & N.A. Sweijd (1999) A case study of abalone poaching in South Africa and its impact on fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56 (6): 10241032.

G. Hønneland (1999) A model of compliance in fisheries: theoretical foundations and practical application. Ocean and Coastal Management 42: 699716.

C. I-Cheng , L.P. Chow & R.V. Rider (1972) The randomized response technique as used in the Taiwan outcome of pregnancy study. Studies in Family Planning 3 (11): 265269.

G.J.L.M. Lensvelt-Mulders , J.J. Hox , P.G.M van der Heijden & C.J.M. Maas (2005) Meta-analysis of randomized response research: 35 years of validation. Sociological Methods Research 33: 319348.

K.K.W. Mak , H. Yanase & R. Renneberg (2005) Cyanide fishing and cyanide detection in coral reef fish using chemical tests and biosensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 20 (12): 25812593.

S.M. McCluskey & R.L. Lewison (2008) Quantifying fishing effort: a synthesis of current methods and their applications. Fish and Fisheries 9: 188200.

T.J. Pitcher , R. Watson , R. Forrest , H. Valtysson & S. Guenette (2002) Estimating illegal and unreported catches from marine ecosystems: a basis for change. Fish and Fisheries 3 (4): 317339.

D.J. Schill & P.A. Kline (1995) Use of random response to estimate angler non-compliance with fishing regulations. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 15 (4): 721731.

J.N. Solomon , S.K. Jacobson , K.D. Wald & M.C. Gavin (2007) Estimating illegal resource use at a Ugandan park with the randomized response technique. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12 (2): 7588.

U.R. Sumaila , J. Alder & H. Keith (2006) Global scope and economics of illegal fishing. Marine Policy 30 (6): 696703.

J.G. Sutinen & K. Kuperan (1999) A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance. International Journal of Social Economics 26 (1–3): 174.

S.L. Warner (1965) Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 60 (309): 6369.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 162 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.