Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 85
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Adams-Hosking, Christine McBride, Marissa F. Baxter, Greg Burgman, Mark de Villiers, Deidre Kavanagh, Rodney Lawler, Ivan Lunney, Daniel Melzer, Alistair Menkhorst, Peter Molsher, Robyn Moore, Ben D. Phalen, David Rhodes, Jonathan R. Todd, Charles Whisson, Desley McAlpine, Clive A. and Richardson, David 2016. Use of expert knowledge to elicit population trends for the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 249.


    Bennett, Nathan James 2016. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 582.


    Bino, G. Kingsford, R. T. and Brandis, K. 2016. Australia's wetlands – learning from the past to manage for the future. Pacific Conservation Biology, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 116.


    Blake, John G. Mosquera, Diego Loiselle, Bette A. Swing, Kelly Guerra, Jaime and Romo, David 2016. Spatial and temporal activity patterns of ocelotsLeopardus pardalisin lowland forest of eastern Ecuador. Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 97, Issue. 2, p. 455.


    Castro, Rodrigo Baia and Albernaz, Ana Luisa 2016. Consistency and use of information about threats in the participatory process for identification of priority conservation areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal for Nature Conservation, Vol. 30, p. 44.


    Cummings, Anthony R. and Read, Jane M. 2016. Drawing on traditional knowledge to identify and describe ecosystem services associated with Northern Amazon’s multiple-use plants. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, Vol. 12, Issue. 1-2, p. 39.


    Dolrenry, Stephanie Hazzah, Leela and Frank, Laurence G. 2016. Conservation and monitoring of a persecuted African lion population by Maasai warriors. Conservation Biology, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 467.


    Garavito-Bermúdez, Diana Lundholm, Cecilia and Crona, Beatrice 2016. Linking a conceptual framework on systems thinking with experiential knowledge. Environmental Education Research, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 89.


    Greenland-Smith, Simon Brazner, John and Sherren, Kate 2016. Farmer perceptions of wetlands and waterbodies: Using social metrics as an alternative to ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics, Vol. 126, p. 58.


    Heck, Nadine Stedman, Richard C. and Gaden, Marc 2016. Human dimensions information needs of fishery managers in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 319.


    Parkinson, Arthur Scott, Mark and Redmond, Declan 2016. Revalorizing colonial era architecture and townscape legacies: memory, identity and place-making in Irish towns. Journal of Urban Design, p. 1.


    Parkinson, Arthur Scott, Mark and Redmond, Declan 2016. Competing discourses of built heritage: lay values in Irish conservation planning. International Journal of Heritage Studies, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 261.


    Thompson, Katie R. Heyman, William D. Peckham, S. Hoyt and Jenkins, Lekelia D. 2016. Key characteristics of successful fisheries learning exchanges. Marine Policy,


    Verma, Audrey van der Wal, René and Fischer, Anke 2016. Imagining wildlife: New technologies and animal censuses, maps and museums. Geoforum, Vol. 75, p. 75.


    Aizpurua, Olatz Cantú-Salazar, Lisette San Martin, Gilles Biver, Gilles Brotons, Lluís Titeux, Nicolas and Jones, Julia 2015. Reconciling expert judgement and habitat suitability models as tools for guiding sampling of threatened species. Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 52, Issue. 6, p. 1608.


    Cooke, Benjamin and Lane, Ruth 2015. How do amenity migrants learn to be environmental stewards of rural landscapes?. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 134, p. 43.


    Cvitanovic, C. Hobday, A.J. van Kerkhoff, L. Wilson, S.K. Dobbs, K. and Marshall, N.A. 2015. Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources: A review of knowledge and research needs. Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 112, p. 25.


    Dorresteijn, Ine Loos, Jacqueline Hanspach, Jan and Fischer, Joern 2015. Socioecological drivers facilitating biodiversity conservation in traditional farming landscapes. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, Vol. 1, Issue. 9, p. art28.


    Drolet, David Locke, Andrea Lewis, Mark A. and Davidson, Jeff 2015. Evidence-based tool surpasses expert opinion in predicting probability of eradication of aquatic nonindigenous species. Ecological Applications, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 441.


    Falkowski, Tomasz B. Martinez-Bautista, Isaias and Diemont, Stewart A.W. 2015. How valuable could traditional ecological knowledge education be for a resource-limited future?: An emergy evaluation in two Mexican villages. Ecological Modelling, Vol. 300, p. 40.


    ×

The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation

  • IOAN FAZEY (a1), JOHN A. FAZEY (a2), JANET G. SALISBURY (a3), DAVID B. LINDENMAYER (a4) and STEVE DOVERS (a4)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037689290600275X
  • Published online: 26 May 2006
Abstract

Understanding the nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation is a necessary step towards understanding if it should be used and how it might be applied with other types of knowledge in an evidence-based approach. This paper describes the nature of experiential and expert knowledge. It then discusses the role of experiential knowledge as a complement to scientific knowledge and explains the interplay between experiential knowledge with conservation research and practice using a simple conceptual model of how individuals learn. There are five main conclusions: (1) because experiential knowledge will always play a role in decision-making, enhancing ability to learn from experiences (including research) will have a significant influence on the effectiveness of conservation outcomes; (2) while experiential knowledge is qualitatively very different from quantitative information, both are important and complementary; (3) some experiential knowledge can be expressed quantitatively, but experiential knowledge can be difficult to isolate as single facts or propositions and qualitative methods will therefore often be required to elicit experiential knowledge; (4) because each person's expertise is unique, when using experiential knowledge the extent of a person's experience and its relevance to a particular problem need to be specified; and (5) as with any form of knowledge, there are limitations to that derived from personal experience. Synthesis and communication of research is therefore essential to help prevent erroneous thinking and, where possible, experiential knowledge should be used in conjunction with other types of information to guide conservation actions.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Dr Ioan Fazey Tel: +44 (0)1970 624471 e-mail: irf@aber.ac.uk
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: