Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Threats of future climate change and land use to vulnerable tree species native to Southern California


Climate and land-use changes are expected to drive high rates of environmental change and biodiversity loss in Mediterranean ecosystems this century. This paper compares the relative future impacts of land use and climate change on two vulnerable tree species native to Southern California (Juglans californica and Quercus engelmannii) using species distribution models. Under the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change's A1B future scenario, high levels of both projected land use and climate change could drive considerable habitat losses on these two already heavily-impacted tree species. Under scenarios of no dispersal, projected climate change poses a greater habitat loss threat relative to projected land use for both species. Assuming unlimited dispersal, climate-driven habitat gains could offset some of the losses due to both drivers, especially in J. californica which could experience net habitat gains under combined impacts of both climate change and land use. Quercus engelmannii, in contrast, could experience net habitat losses under combined impacts, even under best-case unlimited dispersal scenarios. Similarly, projected losses and gains in protected habitat are highly sensitive to dispersal scenario, with anywhere from > 60% loss in protected habitat (no dispersal) to > 170% gain in protected habitat (unlimited dispersal). The findings underscore the importance of dispersal in moderating future habitat loss for vulnerable species.

Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Thomas Gillespie Tel: +1 310 968 2360 e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M.B. Araújo & M. New (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 4247.

M. Barbet-Massin , W. Thuiller & F. Jiguet (2012) The fate of European breeding birds under climate, land-use and dispersal scenarios. Global Change Biology 18: 881890.

M.L. Forister , A.C. McCall , N.J. Sanders , J.A. Fordyce , J.H. Thorne , J. O’Brien , D.P. Waetjen & A.M. Shapiro (2010) Compounded effects of climate change and habitat alteration shift patterns of butterfly diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107: 20882092.

A. Garcia , M. Ortega-Huerta & E. Martinez-Meyer (2013) Potential distributional changes and conservation priorities of endemic amphibians in western Mexico as a result of climate change. Environmental Conservation 41: 112.

C.H. Graham , S. Ferrier , F. Huettman , C. Moritz & A.T. Peterson (2004) New developments in museum-based informatics and application in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 497503.

A. Guisan & W. Thuiller (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8: 9931009.

R.K. Heikkinen , M. Luoto & M.B. Araújo (2006) Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 751777.

R.J. Hijmans , S.E. Cameron , J.L. Parra , P.G. Jones & A. Jarvis (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climate 25: 19651978.

D. Jongsomjit , D. Stralberg , T. Gardali , L. Salas & J. Wiens (2013) Between a rock and a hard place: the impacts of climate change and housing development on breeding birds in California. Landscape Ecology 28: 187200.

K.R. Klausmeyer & M.R. Shaw (2009) Climate change, habitat loss, protected area and the climate adaption potential of species in Mediterranean ecosystems worldwide. PLoS ONE 4: e6392.

L.M. Kueppers , M.A. Snyder , L.C. Sloan , E.S. Zavaleta & B. Fulfrost (2005) Modeled regional climate change and California endemic oak ranges. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 1628116286.

D.A. Levin , J. Francisco-Ortega & R.K. Jansen (1996) Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conservation Biology 10: 1016.

C. Liu , P.M. Berry , T.P. Dawson & R.G. Pearson (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28: 385393.

S.R. Loarie , B.E. Carter , K. Hayhoe , S. McMahon , R. Moe , C.A. Knight & D.D. Ackerly (2008) Climate change and the future of California's endemic flora. PLoS ONE 3: e2502.

M.D. Mastrandrea & A.L. Luers (2012) Climate change in California: scenarios and approaches for adaptation. Climatic Change 111: 516.

C. Merow , M. J. Smith & J. A. Silander (2013) A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36 (10): 10581069.

G.F. Midgley , L. Hannah , D. Millar , M. C. Rutherford & L. W. Powrie (2002) Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11: 445451.

N. Myers , R.A. Mittermeier , C.G. Mittermeier , G.A.B. da Fonseca & J. Kent (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853858.

S.J. Phillips , R.P. Anderson & R.E. Schapire (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modeling 190: 231259.

A.H. Sanstad , H. Johnson , N. Goldstein & G. Franco (2011) Projecting long-run socioeconomic and demographic trends in California under the SRES A2 and B1 scenarios. Climatic Change 109: 2142.

R. Seager , M.F. Ting , I. Held , Y. Kushnir , J. Lu , G. Vecchi , H.P. Huang , N. Harnik , A. Leetmaa , N. C. Lau , C. H. Li , J. Velez & N. Naik (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316: 11811184.

B.M. Sleeter , T.L. Sohl , M.A. Bouchard , R.R. Reker , C.E. Soulard , W. Acevedo , G.E. Griffith , R.R. Sleeter , R.F. Auch , K.L. Sayler , S. Prisley & Z. Zhu (2012) Scenarios of land use and land cover change in the conterminous United States: utilizing the special report on emission scenarios at ecoregional scales. Global Environmental Change 22: 896914.

J.-C. Svenning & B. Sandel (2013) Disequilibrium vegetation dynamics under future climate change. American Journal of Botany 100: 12661286.

C. Tebaldi , K. Hayhoe , J.M. Arblaster & G.A. Meehl (2006) Going to the extremes. Climate Change 79: 185211.

J.A. Wiens , D. Stralberg , D. Jongsomjit , C.A. Howell & M.A. Snyder (2009) Niches, models, and climate change: Assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 1972919736.

K.J. Willis & S.A. Bhagwat (2009) Biodiversity and climate change. Science 326: 806807.

D.E. Wolf , N. Takebayashi & L.H. Rieseberg (2001) Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridization. Conservation Biology 15: 10391053.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Riordan Supplementary Material
Appendix 1

 Word (17 KB)
17 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 177 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.