Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 16
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Belkayali, Nur Güloğlu, Yavuz and Şevik, Hakan 2016. What affects perceptions of local residents toward protected areas? A case study from Kure Mountains National Park, Turkey. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 194.

    Turvey, Samuel T. Fernández-Secades, Cristina Nuñez-Miño, Jose M. Hart, Tom Martinez, Pedro Brocca, Jorge L. and Young, Richard P. 2014. Is local ecological knowledge a useful conservation tool for small mammals in a Caribbean multicultural landscape?. Biological Conservation, Vol. 169, p. 189.

    Palamar, Maria Baron Peterson, M. Nils Deperno, Christopher S. and Correa, Maria T. 2013. Assessing rabies knowledge and perceptions among ethnic minorities in Greensboro, North Carolina. The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 77, Issue. 7, p. 1321.

    Mehring, Marion Seeberg-Elverfeldt, Christina Koch, Sebastian Barkmann, Jan Schwarze, Stefan and Stoll-Kleemann, Susanne 2011. Local institutions: Regulation and valuation of forest use—Evidence from Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 736.

    Peterson, M. Nils Lopez, Angelica Mertig, Angela G. and Liu, Jianguo 2011. Assessing Attitudes Toward Wildlife Ownership in United States–Mexico Borderlands. Society & Natural Resources, Vol. 24, Issue. 9, p. 962.

    Heinen, Joel T. 2010. The Importance of a Social Science Research Agenda in the Management of Protected Natural Areas, with Selected Examples. The Botanical Review, Vol. 76, Issue. 2, p. 140.

    Peterson, M. Nils Peterson, Tarla Rai Lopez, Angelica and Liu, Jianguo 2010. Views of Private-Land Stewardship among Latinos on the Texas–Tamaulipas Border. Environmental Communication, Vol. 4, Issue. 4, p. 406.

    Shava, Soul Krasny, Marianne E. Tidball, Keith G. and Zazu, Cryton 2010. Agricultural knowledge in urban and resettled communities: applications to social–ecological resilience and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, Vol. 16, Issue. 5-6, p. 575.

    Tilson, Ronald and Nyhus, Philip J. 2010. Tigers of the World.

    Vodouhê, Fifanou G. Coulibaly, Ousmane Adégbidi, Anselme and Sinsin, Brice 2010. Community perception of biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin. Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 12, Issue. 7, p. 505.

    Nils Peterson, M. Sternberg, Mitch Lopez, Angelica and Liu, Jianguo 2008. Ocelot Awareness among Latinos on the Texas and Tamaulipas Border. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 13, Issue. 5, p. 339.

    Pilgrim, Sarah Smith, David and Pretty, Jules 2007. A CROSS-REGIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE FACTORS AFFECTING ECOLITERACY: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE. Ecological Applications, Vol. 17, Issue. 6, p. 1742.


    Ballard, Heidi L. and Huntsinger, Lynn 2006. Salal Harvester Local Ecological Knowledge, Harvest Practices and Understory Management on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Human Ecology, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 529.

    Byg, Anja Vormisto, Jaana and Balslev, Henrik 2006. Using the useful: characteristics of used palms in south-eastern Ecuador. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 8, Issue. 4, p. 495.

    STEINMETZ, ROBERT CHUTIPONG, WANLOP and SEUATURIEN, NARET 2006. Collaborating to Conserve Large Mammals in Southeast Asia. Conservation Biology, Vol. 20, Issue. 5, p. 1391.


Wildlife knowledge among migrants in southern Sumatra, Indonesia: implications for conservation

  • Philip J. Nyhus (a1), undefined Sumianto (a2) and Ronald Tilson (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 August 2003

The value of traditional ecological knowledge for biodiversity research and conservation is widely recognized. The value of wildlife knowledge provided by recent migrants is less clear. Photographs of 10 mammal species were shown to 622 individuals in communities near Way Kambas National Park in Sumatra, Indonesia, to assess wildlife knowledge among recent migrants and to identify socio-economic variables that can be used to identify more knowledgeable informants. Knowledge scores were categorized by taxonomic family, genus and species. Large, charismatic and abundant animals were identified more frequently than smaller and more secretive animals. Higher knowledge scores were significantly associated with males, higher educational attainment and past experience with these animals. Number of years respondents had lived in the area and respondent age were also good predictors of higher scores. The characteristics of animals that were likely to be identified more accurately were assessed. Generic terms used to describe animals can confound individual responses. Biodiversity research, conservation and education programmes frequently rely on ‘local’ knowledge to inform management and policy. This information can be a valuable addition to field-based efforts to identify the distribution and abundance of rare endangered species. With more and more migrants living near the world's wildlife protected areas, care must be taken to understand how human demographic shifts may affect such studies.

Corresponding author
Correspondence: Dr Philip Nyhus Tel: +1 717 358 4555 Fax: +1 717 291 4186 e-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *