Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Open access
  • Cited by 21
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    El-Sayed, A. El-Shannat, S. Kamel, M. Castañeda-Vazquez, M. A. and Castañeda-Vazquez, H. 2016. Molecular Epidemiology ofMycobacterium bovisin Humans and Cattle. Zoonoses and Public Health, Vol. 63, Issue. 4, p. 251.


    Gerhold, Richard and Hickling, Graham 2016. Diseases associated with translocation of captive cervids in North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 25.


    Ribeiro-Lima, J. Carstensen, M. Cornicelli, L. Forester, J. D. and Wells, S. J. 2016. Patterns of Cattle Farm Visitation by White-Tailed Deer in Relation to Risk of Disease Transmission in a Previously Infected Area with Bovine Tuberculosis in Minnesota, USA. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases,


    Cowie, Catherine E. Gortázar, Christian White, Piran C.L. Hutchings, Michael R. and Vicente, Joaquín 2015. Stakeholder opinions on the practicality of management interventions to control bovine tuberculosis. The Veterinary Journal, Vol. 204, Issue. 2, p. 179.


    Gortázar, Christian Che Amat, Azlan and O'Brien, Daniel J. 2015. Open questions and recent advances in the control of a multi-host infectious disease: animal tuberculosis. Mammal Review, Vol. 45, Issue. 3, p. 160.


    King, Hayley C. Murphy, Andrew James, Phillip Travis, Emma Porter, David Hung, Yu-Jiun Sawyer, Jason Cork, Jennifer Delahay, Richard J. Gaze, William Courtenay, Orin and Wellington, Elizabeth M. 2015. The variability and seasonality of the environmental reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis shed by wild European badgers. Scientific Reports, Vol. 5, p. 12318.


    Lavelle, Michael J. Henry, Campa III LeDoux, Kyle Ryan, Patrick J. Fischer, Justin W. Pepin, Kim M. Blass, Chad R. Glow, Michael P. Hygnstrom, Scott E. and VerCauteren, Kurt C. 2015. Deer response to exclusion from stored cattle feed in Michigan, USA. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 121, Issue. 1-2, p. 159.


    Mellado, Miguel Reséndiz, Dulce Martínez, Angel Mario de Santiago, Maria Angeles Véliz, Francisco Gerardo and García, Jose Eduardo 2015. Milk yield and reproductive performance of Holstein cows testing positive for bovine tuberculosis. Tropical Animal Health and Production, Vol. 47, Issue. 6, p. 1061.


    Miller, R. S. Sweeney, S. J. Akkina, J. E. and Saito, E. K. 2015. Potential Intercontinental Movement of Influenza A(H7N9) Virus into North America by Wild Birds: Application of a Rapid Assessment Framework. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, Vol. 62, Issue. 6, p. 650.


    Miller, Michele Buss, Peter Hofmeyr, Jennifer Olea-Popelka, Francisco Parsons, Sven and van Helden, Paul 2015. Antemortem Diagnosis ofMycobacterium bovisInfection in Free-ranging African Lions (Panthera leo) and Implications for Transmission. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 493.


    Thacker, Tyler C. Palmer, Mitchell V. Robbe-Austerman, Suelee Stuber, Tod P. and Waters, W. Ray 2015. Anatomical distribution of Mycobacterium bovis genotypes in experimentally infected white-tailed deer. Veterinary Microbiology, Vol. 180, Issue. 1-2, p. 75.


    Berentsen, Are R. Miller, Ryan S. Misiewicz, Regina Malmberg, Jennifer L. and Dunbar, Mike R. 2014. Characteristics of white-tailed deer visits to cattle farms: implications for disease transmission at the wildlife–livestock interface. European Journal of Wildlife Research, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 161.


    Cantas, Leon and Suer, Kaya 2014. Review: The Important Bacterial Zoonoses in “One Health” Concept. Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 2,


    Grear, Daniel A. Kaneene, John B. Averill, James J. and Webb, Colleen T. 2014. Local cattle movements in response to ongoing bovine tuberculosis zonation and regulations in Michigan, USA. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 114, Issue. 3-4, p. 201.


    Hardstaff, Joanne L. Marion, Glenn Hutchings, Michael R. and White, Piran C.L. 2014. Evaluating the tuberculosis hazard posed to cattle from wildlife across Europe. Research in Veterinary Science, Vol. 97, p. S86.


    McCluskey, B. Lombard, J. Strunk, S. Nelson, D. Robbe-Austerman, S. Naugle, A. and Edmondson, A. 2014. Mycobacterium bovis in California dairies: A case series of 2002–2013 outbreaks. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 115, Issue. 3-4, p. 205.


    Pinedo, P.J. 2014. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems.


    Tsao, Kimberly Robbe-Austerman, Suelee Miller, Ryan S. Portacci, Katie Grear, Daniel A. and Webb, Colleen 2014. Sources of bovine tuberculosis in the United States. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, Vol. 28, p. 137.


    Verma, Amit Kumar Tiwari, Ruchi Chakrabort, Sandip ., Neha Saminathan, Mani Dhama, Kuldeep and Singh, Shoor Vir 2014. Insights into Bovine Tuberculosis (bTB), Various Approaches for its Diagnosis, Control and its Public Health Concerns: An Update. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, Vol. 9, Issue. 6, p. 323.


    Waters, W.R. Thacker, T.C. Nelson, J.T. DiCarlo, D.M. Maggioli, M.F. Greenwald, R. Esfandiari, J. Lyashchenko, K.P. and Palmer, M.V. 2014. Virulence of Two Strains of Mycobacterium bovis in Cattle Following Aerosol Infection. Journal of Comparative Pathology, Vol. 151, Issue. 4, p. 410.


    ×

Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations

  • R. S. MILLER (a1) and S. J. SWEENEY (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268813000976
  • Published online: 09 May 2013
Abstract
SUMMARY

Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), the causative agent of bovine tuberculosis, has been identified in nine geographically distinct wildlife populations in North America and Hawaii and is endemic in at least three populations, including members of the Bovidae, Cervidae, and Suidae families. The emergence of M. bovis in North American wildlife poses a serious and growing risk for livestock and human health and for the recreational hunting industry. Experience in many countries, including the USA and Canada, has shown that while M. bovis can be controlled when restricted to livestock species, it is almost impossible to eradicate once it has spread into ecosystems with free-ranging maintenance hosts. Therefore, preventing transmission of M. bovis to wildlife may be the most effective way to mitigate economic and health costs of this bacterial pathogen. Here we review the status of M. bovis infection in wildlife of North America and identify risks for its establishment in uninfected North American wildlife populations where eradication or control would be difficult and costly. We identified four common risk factors associated with establishment of M. bovis in uninfected wildlife populations in North America, (1) commingling of infected cattle with susceptible wildlife, (2) supplemental feeding of wildlife, (3) inadequate surveillance of at-risk wildlife, and (4) unrecognized emergence of alternate wildlife species as successful maintenance hosts. We then propose the use of integrated and adaptive disease management to mitigate these risk factors to prevent establishment of M. bovis in susceptible North American wildlife species.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
The authors of this article are US government employees. The online version of the article is published within an Open Access environment and may be freely copied, subject to attribution.
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence: R. S. Miller, 2150 Centre Avenue, Bldg B, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. (Email: Ryan.S.Miller@aphis.usda.gov; Ryan.Miller@rsmiller.net)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

3.LM O'Reilly , CJ Daborn . The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections in animals and man: a review. Tubercle and Lung Disease 1995; 76 (Suppl. 1): 146.

8.RS Morris , DU Pfeiffer . Directions and issues in bovine tuberculosis epidemiology and control in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 1995; 43: 256265.

14.DJ O'Brien , Managing the wildlife reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis: the Michigan, USA, experience. Veterinary Microbiology 2006; 112: 313323.

15.SM Schmitt , Bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging white-tailed deer from Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 1997; 33: 749758.

16.V Naranjo , Evidence of the role of European wild boar as a reservoir of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Veterinary Microbiology 2008; 127: 19.

27.DJ O'Brien , Tuberculous lesions in free-ranging white-tailed deer in Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2001; 37: 608613.

28.DJ O'Brien , Epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis in free-ranging white-tailed deer, Michigan, USA, 1995–2000. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2002; 54: 4763.

29.MV Palmer , Tonsillar lesions in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Veterinary Record 2002; 151: 149.

36.JS Nishi , T Shury , BT Elkin . Wildlife reservoirs for bovine tuberculosis Mycobacterium bovis) in Canada: strategies for management and research. Veterinary Microbiology 2006; 112: 325338.

38.H Barrios-García , Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by histopathology and PCR in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Tamaulipas, Mexico. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2012; 11: 10361040.

58.PC Cross , Effects of management and climate on elk brucellosis in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Ecological Applications 2007; 17: 957964.

60.LL Wolfe , A bighorn sheep die-off in southern Colorado involving a Pasteurellaceae strain that may have originated from syntopic cattle. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2010; 46: 12621268.

63.TP Rooney . Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective. Forestry 2001; 74: 201208.

65.MJ Butler , Wildlife ranching in North America– arguments, issues, and perspectives. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2005; 33: 381389.

66.SM Cooper , Distribution and interspecies contact of feral swine and cattle on rangelands in South Texas: implications for disease transmission. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2010; 46: 152164.

69.R Miller , Evaluation of the influence of supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in the Michigan wild deer population. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2003; 39: 8495.

77.LAL Corner . The role of wild animal populations in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in domestic animals: how to assess the risk. Veterinary Microbiology 2006; 112: 303–12.

78.JP McInerney , KJ Small , P Caley . Prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in feral pigs in the Northern Territory. Australian Veterinary Journal 2008; 72: 448451.

79.A Aranaz , Bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in wildlife in Spain. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2004; 42: 26022608.

80.JH de Mendoza , Bovine tuberculosis in wild boar (Sus scrofa), red deer (Cervus elaphus) and cattle (Bos taurus) in a Mediterranean ecosystem (1992–2004). Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2006; 74: 239247.

83.G Wasserberg , Host culling as an adaptive management tool for chronic wasting disease in white tailed deer: a modelling study. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009; 46: 457466.

84.S Thirgood . New perspectives on managing wildlife diseases. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009; 46: 454456.

86.M Hartley , E Gill . Assessment and mitigation processes for disease risks associated with wildlife management and conservation interventions. Veterinary Record 2010; 166: 487490.

87.M Hartley , R Lysons . Development of the England Wildlife Health Strategy – a framework for decision makers. Veterinary Record 2011; 168: 158164.

88.R Lysons , J Gibbens , L Smith . Progress with enhancing veterinary surveillance in the United Kingdom. Veterinary Record 2007; 160: 105–12.

91.MA McCarthy , HP Possingham . Active adaptive management for conservation. Conservation Biology 2007; 21: 956963.

92.DJ O'Brien , Management of bovine tuberculosis in Michigan wildlife: current status and near term prospects. Veterinary Microbiology 2011; 151: 179–87.

97.K VerCauteren , T Gehring , J Landry . The dynamic role of livestock protection dogs in a changing world. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2010; 6: 7374.

100.R Woodroffe , Bovine tuberculosis in cattle and badgers in localized culling areas. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2009; 45: 128143.

101.ME Meyer , M Meagher . Brucellosis in free-ranging bison (Bison bison) in Yellowstone, Grand Teton, and Wood Buffalo National Parks: a review. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 1995; 31: 579598.

105.MK Cosgrove , Modeling vaccination and targeted removal of white-tailed deer in Michigan for bovine tuberculosis control. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2012; 36: 676684.

106.AR Berentsen , Active use of coyotes (Canis latrans) to detect bovine tuberculosis in northeastern Michigan, USA. Veterinary Microbiology 2011; 151: 126–32.

110.CS Bruning-Fann , Mycobacterium bovis in coyotes from Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 1998; 34: 632–6.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: