Skip to main content
×
Home

Surveillance during an era of rapidly changing poliovirus epidemiology in India: the role of one vs. two stool specimens in poliovirus detection, 2000–2010

  • C. V. CARDEMIL (a1) (a2), M. RATHEE (a3), H. GARY (a1), K. WANNEMUEHLER (a1), A. ANAND (a1), O. MACH (a1), S. BAHL (a3), S. WASSILAK (a1), S.Y. CHU (a1), A. KHERA (a4), H. S. JAFARI (a3) and M. A. PALLANSCH (a5)...
Summary
SUMMARY

Since 2004, efforts to improve poliovirus detection have significantly increased the volume of specimen testing from acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) patients in India. One option to decrease collection and testing burden would be collecting only a single stool specimen instead of two. We investigated stool specimen sensitivity for poliovirus detection in India to estimate the contribution of the second specimen. We reviewed poliovirus isolation data for 303984 children aged <15 years with AFP during 2000–2010. Using maximum-likelihood estimation, we determined specimen sensitivity of each stool specimen, combined sensitivity of both specimens, and sensitivity added by the second specimen. Of 5184 AFP patients with poliovirus isolates, 382 (7·4%) were identified only by the second specimen. Sensitivity was 91·4% for the first specimen and 84·5% for the second specimen; the second specimen added 7·3% sensitivity, giving a combined sensitivity of 98·7%. Combined sensitivity declined, and added sensitivity increased, as the time from paralysis onset to stool collection increased (P = 0·032). The sensitivity added by the second specimen is important to detect the last chains of poliovirus transmission and to achieve certification of polio eradication. For sensitive surveillance, two stool specimens should continue to be collected from each AFP patient in India.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Author for correspondence: Dr C. V. Cardemil, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. (Email: ccardemil@cdc.gov)
References
Hide All
1. Government of India. Field Guide: Surveillance of Acute Flaccid Paralysis, 3rd edn. Child Health Division, Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi. September 2005.
2. National Polio Surveillance Project. Components of AFP surveillance (http://www.npspindia.org/Surveillance%20Strategy.asp). Accessed 20 October 2012.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress toward poliomyelitis eradication – India, January 2010–September 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2011; 60: 14821486.
4. Pinheiro FP, et al. Eradication of wild poliovirus from the Americas: wild poliovirus surveillance – laboratory issues. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1997; 175 (Suppl. 1): S4349.
5. National Polio Surveillance Project. Laboratory budget analysis, November 2011.
6. World Health Organization. Global poliomyelitis eradication initiative: summary of external resource requirements by major category of activity, 2011–2012.
7. Independent Monitoring Board of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Report, February 2012. (www.polioeradication.org/portals/0/document/aboutus/governance/imb/5imbmeeting/imbreport_january2012.pdf). Accessed 20 October 2012.
8. Lennette EH. Problems of the viral diagnostic laboratory with respect to poliomyelitis. Poliomyelitis: papers and discussions presented at the Fourth International Poliomyelitis Conference. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1958, pp. 377386.
9. India Expert Advisory Group for Polio Eradication. Conclusions and recommendations, 22nd Meeting of the India Expert Advisory Group for Polio Eradication, New Delhi, India, 1–2 November 2010.
10. World Health Organization. Polio Laboratory Manual, 4th edn. Geneva, Switzerland, 2004 (http://www.who.int/vaccines/en/poliolab/WHO-Polio-Manual-9.pdf). Accessed 4 February 2013.
11. Gary HE Jr., Sanders R, Pallansch MA. A theoretical framework for evaluating the sensitivity of surveillance for detecting wild poliovirus: I. Factors affecting the detection sensitivity in a person with acute flaccid paralysis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1997; 175 (Suppl. 1): S135140.
12. Alexander JP Jr., Gary HE Jr., Pallansch MA. Duration of poliovirus excretion and its implications for acute flaccid paralysis surveillance: a review of the literature. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1997; 175 (Suppl. 1): S176182.
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreaks following wild poliovirus importations – Europe, Africa, and Asia, January 2009–September 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2010; 59: 13931399.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notes from the field: poliomyelitis outbreak – Republic of the Congo, September 2010–February 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2011; 60: 312313.
15. Kohler KA, et al. Contribution of second stool specimen to increased sensitivity of poliovirus detection in India, 1998–2000. Epidemiology and Infection 2003; 131: 711811.
16. Yoneyama T, et al. Necessity of two-stool sample test for sensitive detection of poliovirus. Japan Journal of Infectious Diseases 2001; 54: 250251.
17. World Health Organization. Performance of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance and incidence of poliomyelitis, 2011. Weekly Epidemiological Record 2011; 86: 575579.
18. World Health Organization. Summary of discussions and recommendations of the 18th Informal Consultation of the Global Polio Laboratory Network, 28–29 June 2012 (http://www.polioeradication.org/Portals/0/Document/Resources/GPLN_publications/GPLN_Meeting_recommendations_2012.pdf). Accessed 4 February 2013.
19. Silveira CM, et al. Polio diagnosis: one or two samples? EPI Newsletter: Expanded Program on Immunization in the Americas 1995; XVII: 12.
20. de Quadros CA, et al. Eradication of wild poliovirus from the Americas: acute flaccid paralysis surveillance, 1988–1995. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1997; 175 (Suppl. 1): S3742.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 95 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.