Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T02:13:38.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016


This paper discusses the permissibility of exclusively relying on a procedural objectivity model for news reporting, from the perspective of the normativity of informative speech acts. It is argued that, with the exception of urgency situations, the paradigmatic application of procedural objectivity is in breach of the relevant norms.

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Bach, K. and Harnish, R. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Rose, K. 2002. ‘Assertion, Knowledge and Context.’ Philosophical Review, 111: 167203.Google Scholar
Douven, I. 2006. ‘Assertion, Knowledge and Rational Credibility.’ Philosophical Review, 115: 449–85.Google Scholar
Foreman, G. 2010. The Ethical Journalist. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. 2012. ‘Stating and Insinuating.’ Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 86: 6194.Google Scholar
Gettier, E. L. 1963. ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Analysis, 23: 121–3.Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, D. L. 2010. ‘Pragmatic Objectivity in History, Journalism and Philosophy.’ SWPS Presidential Address, Memphis, TN, 13.11.2010.Google Scholar
Hirst, M. and Patching, R. 2005. Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J. 2009. ‘Assertion, Knowledge and Lotteries.’ In Pritchard, P. G. (ed.), Williamson on Knowledge, pp. 140–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2007. ‘Norms of Assertion.’ Nous, 41: 594626.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2013. ‘Deficient Testimonial Knowledge.’ In Henning, T. and Schweikard, D. P. (eds), Knowledge, Virtue and Action: Essays on Putting Epistemic Virtues to Work, pp. 3053. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. G. and Schafer, M. L. 2012. ‘Debunking Sarah Palin: Mainstream News Coverage of ‘Death Panels’.’ Journalism, 13: 766–82.Google Scholar
McKane, A. 2006. News Writing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pingree, R. J. 2011. ‘Effects of Unresolved Factual Disputes in the News on Epistemic Political Efficacy.’ Journal of Communication, 61: 2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poerksen, B. 2011. The Creation of Reality: A Constructivist Epistemology of Journalism and Journalism Education. Koeck, A. R. and Koeck, W. K. (transl.). Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. 2002. ‘Testimony, Knowledge, and Epistemic Goals.’ Philosophical Studies, 110: 139–61.Google Scholar
Rieder, R. 2007. ‘Counting the Spoons: Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Covering National Security and Political Campaigns.’ American Journalism Review, 29: 4.Google Scholar
Simion, M. 2015. ‘Assertion: Knowledge is Enough.’ Synthese. Online First.Google Scholar
Simion, M. Forthcoming. ‘Assertion, Knowledge and Rational Credibility: The Scoreboard.’ In Grajner, M. and Schmechtig, P. (eds), Epistemic Reasons, Epistemic Norms, and Epistemic Goals. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sparrow, B. 1999. Uncertain Guardians: The News Media as a Political Institution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Turri, J. 2011. ‘The Express Knowledge Account of Assertion.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89: 3745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, S. 2006. The Invention of Journalism Ethics. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2004. ‘Relevance Theory.’ In Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 249–87. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2014. ‘Scientific Explanation.’ In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2014 Edition. Scholar
Zimmerman, M. 1997. ‘Moral Responsibility and Ignorance.’ Ethics, 107: 410–26.Google Scholar