Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Group Knowledge Versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology


Social epistemology is a many-splendored subject. Different theorists adopt different approaches and the options are quite diverse, often orthogonal to one another. The approach I favor is to examine social practices in terms of their impact on knowledge acquisition (Goldman 1999). This has at least two virtues: it displays continuity with traditional epistemology, which historically focuses on knowledge, and it intersects with the concerns of practical life, which are pervasively affected by what people know or don't know. In making this choice, I am not blind to the allure of alternative approaches. In this paper I explain and motivate the knowledge-centered approach by contrasting it with a newly emerging alternative that has a definite appeal of its own. According to this alternative, the chief dimension of social epistemological interest would be rationality rather than knowledge.

Hide All
G. Brennan (2001). Collective coherence? International Review of Law and Economics 21: 197211.

B. Chapman (1998). More easily done than said: Rules, reason and rational social choice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18: 293329.

Alvin Goldman (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alvin Goldman (2002b). Pathways to Knowledge: Private and Public. New York: Oxford University Press.

L.A. Kornhauser and L.G. Sager (1993). The one and the many: Adjudication in collegial courts. Califronia Law Review 81: 159.

Philip Pettit (1993). The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lloyd Shapley and Bernard Grofman (1984). Optimizing group judgmental accuracy in the presence of interdependence. Public Choice 43: 329343.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 300 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.