No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Similarities and differences between specification and non-uniform specification
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2024
Abstract
Pavlov [Adv. Math. 295 (2016), 250–270; Nonlinearity 32 (2019), 2441–2466] studied the measures of maximal entropy for dynamical systems with weak versions of specification property and found the existence of intrinsic ergodicity would be influenced by the assumptions of the gap functions. Inspired by these, in this article, we study the dynamical systems with non-uniform specification property. We give some basic properties these systems have and give an assumption for the gap functions to ensure the systems have the following five properties: CO-measures are dense in invariant measures; for every non-empty compact connected subset of invariant measures, its saturated set is dense in the total space; ergodic measures are residual in invariant measures; ergodic measures are connected; and entropy-dense. In addition, we will give examples to show the assumption is optimal.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Abdenur, F., Bonatti, C. and Crovisier, S.. Nonuniform hyperbolicity for
${\mathrm{C}}^1$
-generic diffeomorphisms. Israel J. Math. 183 (2011), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
${\mathrm{C}}^1$
-generic diffeomorphisms. Israel J. Math. 183 (2011), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBanks, J., Brooks, J., Cairns, G., Davis, G. and Stacey, P.. On Devaney’s definition of chaos. Amer. Math. Monthly 99(4) (1992), 332–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, R.. Periodic points and measures for Axiom
$\mathrm{A}$
diffeomorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 154 (1971), 377–397.Google Scholar
$\mathrm{A}$
diffeomorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 154 (1971), 377–397.Google ScholarBurguet, D.. Topological and almost Borel universality for systems with the weak specification property. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 40(8) (2020), 2098–2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, E., Küpper, T. and Shu, L.. Topological entropy for divergence points. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 25(4) (2005), 1173–1208.Google Scholar
Climenhaga, V. and Thompson, D. J.. Intrinsic ergodicity beyond specification:
$\beta$
-shifts,
$S$
-gap shifts, and their factors. Israel J. Math. 192(2) (2012), 785–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\beta$
-shifts,
$S$
-gap shifts, and their factors. Israel J. Math. 192(2) (2012), 785–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarDateyama, M.. Invariant measures for homeomorphisms with almost weak specification. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics (Tbilisi, 1982) (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1021). Ed. Prokhorov, J. V. and Itô, K.. Springer, Berlin, 1983, pp. 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denker, M., Grillenberger, C. and Sigmund, K.. Ergodic Theory on Compact Spaces (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 527). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y., Tian, X. and Yuan, X.. Ergodic properties of systems with asymptotic average shadowing property. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 432(1) (2015), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downarowicz, T.. Positive topological entropy implies chaos DC2. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 142(1) (2014), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eizenberg, A., Kifer, Y. and Weiss, B.. Large deviations for Zd-actions. Comm. Math. Phys. 164(3) (1994), 433–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfert, K. and Kwietniak, D.. On density of ergodic measures and generic points. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 38(5) (2018), 1745–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirayama, M.. Periodic probability measures are dense in the set of invariant measures. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 9(5) (2003), 1185–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, X., Lin, W. and Tian, X.. Ergodic average of typical orbits and typical functions. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 43(7) (2023), 2781–2811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, X., Tian, X. and Yuan, Y.. The growth of periodic orbits with large support. Nonlinearity 36(6) (2023), 2975–3012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwietniak, D., Ła̧cka, M. and Oprocha, P.. A panorama of specification-like properties and their consequences. Dynamics and Numbers (Contemporary Mathematics, 669). Ed. Kolyada, S., Möller, M., Moree, P. and Ward, T.. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2016, pp. 155–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. and Wu, M.. Generic property of irregular sets in systems satisfying the specification property. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 34(2) (2014), 635–645.Google Scholar
Liang, C., Liu, G. and Sun, W.. Approximation properties on invariant measure and Oseledec splitting in non-uniformly hyperbolic systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361(3) (2009), 1543–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, C., Sun, W. and Tian, X.. Ergodic properties of invariant measures for
${\mathrm{C}}^{1+\unicode{x3b1}}$
non-uniformly hyperbolic systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 33(2) (2013), 560–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
${\mathrm{C}}^{1+\unicode{x3b1}}$
non-uniformly hyperbolic systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 33(2) (2013), 560–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarLima, H. and Varandas, P.. On the rotation sets of generic homeomorphisms on the torus
${\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{d}}$
. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 41(10) (2021), 2983–3022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
${\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{d}}$
. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 41(10) (2021), 2983–3022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarLiu, C. and Liu, X.. The irregular set for maps with almost weak specification property has full metric mean dimension. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 534(1) (2024), Paper no. 128043, 26pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, B.. A note on periodic points for ergodic toral automorphisms. Monatsh. Math. 89(2) (1980), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, R.. On intrinsic ergodicity and weakenings of the specification property. Adv. Math. 295 (2016), 250–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, R.. On controlled specification and uniqueness of the equilibrium state in expansive systems. Nonlinearity 32(7) (2019), 2441–2466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfister, C. E. and Sullivan, W. G.. Large deviations estimates for dynamical systems without the specification property. Applications to the
$\beta$
-shifts. Nonlinearity 18(1) (2005), 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\beta$
-shifts. Nonlinearity 18(1) (2005), 237–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPfister, C. E. and Sullivan, W. G.. On the topological entropy of saturated sets. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27(3) (2007), 929–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quas, A. and Soo, T.. Ergodic universality of some topological dynamical systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 368(6) (2016), 4137–4170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinoda, M.. Uncountably many maximizing measures for a dense subset of continuous functions. Nonlinearity 31(5) (2018), 2192–2200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigmund, K.. Generic properties of invariant measures for Axiom diffeomorphisms. Invent. Math. 11 (1970), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigmund, K.. On dynamical systems with the specification property. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 190 (1974), 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. J.. The irregular set for maps with the specification property has full topological pressure. Dyn. Syst. 25(1) (2010), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. J.. Irregular sets, the
$\beta$
-transformation and the almost specification property. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364(10) (2012), 5395–5414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\beta$
-transformation and the almost specification property. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364(10) (2012), 5395–5414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarVillani, C.. Optimal Transport. Old and New (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 338). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar