Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-nzrtw Total loading time: 0.296 Render date: 2022-12-03T08:15:41.935Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Proportionality in the Afghanistan War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 McMahan, Jeff, Killing in War (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2009), pp. 3851CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 This presupposes, controversially, that status as a just or unjust combatant cannot depend on whether one's war is proportionate. For assessments of narrow and wide proportionality depend on a prior determination of the status of combatants.

3 This is the guideline we advocate: Conduct your war in the presence of noncombatants on the other side with the same care as if your citizens were the noncombatants.” Margalit, Avishai and Walzer, Michael, “Israel: Civilians and Combatants,” New York Review of Books 56, May 14, 2009, p. 22Google Scholar.

4 The Christian pastor Terry Jones has said that “we knew that they might act with violence,” but also says that even now that he knows the actual consequences, he would still do it again. Alvarez, Lizette, “Koran-Burning Pastor Unrepentant in Face of Furor,” New York Times, April 2, 2011Google Scholar.

5 Bohannon, John, “Counting the Dead in Afghanistan,” Science 11 (March 2011), pp. 1256–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 I say more about this, and about the claims in the following paragraph, in “What Rights May We Defend by Killing?” in Fabre, Cécile and Lazar, Seth, eds., Why We Fight: The Purposes of Military Force in the 21st Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar.

5
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Proportionality in the Afghanistan War
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Proportionality in the Afghanistan War
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Proportionality in the Afghanistan War
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *