Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Citizenship for Sale: Neomedieval, not Just Neoliberal?

  • Ana Tanasoca (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Opponents of commodification say that some things should not be for sale. Is citizenship one of them? Citizenship-by-investment schemes of naturalization allow investors virtually to “buy” citizenship. Revisiting objections to the older practice of selling another civic status—noble status—underscores many reasons why this trade may be regarded as problematic. The practice of selling citizenship is not only similar to that of selling honours but might also be thought wrong in analogous ways.

Résumé

Les opposants à la marchandisation affirment que certaines choses ne devraient pas pouvoir être vendues. La citoyenneté est-elle l’une de ces choses ? Certains mécanismes de naturalisation par acquisition de « citoyenneté par investissement » permettent virtuellement aux investisseurs d’acheter leur citoyenneté. Un retour sur les objections formulées à l’encontre d’une pratique plus ancienne de vente d’un autre statut civique – la noblesse – souligne les nombreuses raisons pour lesquelles ce commerce peut être considéré comme problématique. La pratique de vente de citoyenneté n’est pas seulement similaire à celle de la vente d’honneurs, elle peut être considérée comme mauvaise pour des raisons analogues.

Zusammenfassung

Vermarktungsgegner behaupten, dass gewisse Dinge nicht verkauft werden dürften. Gehört die Staatsangehörigkeit dazu? Einbürgerungsmechanismen basierend auf dem Erwerb der Staatsangehörigkeit durch Investitionen erlauben Investoren virtuell ihre Staatsbürgerschaft zu erwerben. Einwände, dass früher ein ziviler Status wie der eines Adelstitels käuflich erworben werden konnte, verdeutlichen, weshalb dieses Geschäft als problematisch angesehen werden muss. Die Praxis des Staatsangehörigkeitsverkaufs ist nicht nur mit der von Ehrentiteln vergleichbar, sondern sie muss auch aus analogen Gründen als schlecht betrachtet werden.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Robert Axelrod and William D. Hamilton , 1981. “The Evolution of Cooperation”, Science, 211: 1390-1396.

Shaheen Borna and James N. Stearns , 2002. “The Ethics and Efficacy of Selling National Citizenship”, Journal of Business Ethics, 37: 193-207.

Richard Epstein , 1985. “Why Restrain Alienation?” Columbia Law Review, 85: 970-990.

Herbert Gintis , Eric Alden Smith and Samuel Bowles , 2001. “Costly Signalling and Cooperation”, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 213: 103-119.

Robert E Goodin ., 2004. “Support With Strings: Workfare as an ‘Impermissible Condition’”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21: 297-308.

Peter A. Hall and David Soskice (eds), 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

Charles R Mayes ., 1957. “The Sale of Peerages in Early Stuart England”, Journal of Modern History, 29: 21-37.

Margaret Jane Radin , 1987. “Market Inalienability”, Harvard Law Review, 100: 1849-1937.

Susan Rose-Ackerman , 1985. “Inalienability and the Theory of Property Rights”, Columbia Law Review, 85: 931-969.

Debra Satz , 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be For Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York, Oxford University Press).

Samuel Scheffler , 1997. “Relationships and Responsibilities”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26: 189-209.

Ayelet Shachar and Ran Hirschl , 2014. “On Citizenship, States, and Markets”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 22: 231-257.

Herbert A Simon ., 1951. “A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship”, Econometrica, 19: 293-305.

Jay M Smith ., 1996. The Culture of Merit (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press).

Lawrence Stone , 1958. “The Inflation of Honours 1558-1641”, Past and Present, 14: 45-70.

James Tobin , 1970. “On Limiting the Domain of Inequality”, Journal of Law and Economics, 13: 263-277.

Laurence H Tribe ., 1985. “The Abortion Funding Conundrum: Inalienable Rights, Affirmative Duties, and the Dilemma of Dependence”, Harvard Law Review, 99: 330-343.

Robert L Trivers ., 1971. “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism”, Quarterly Review of Biology, 46: 35-57.

Viviana A Zelizer ., 1996. “Payments and Social Ties”, Sociological Forum, 11: 481-495.

Viviana A Zelizer ., 2000. “The Purchase of Intimacy”, Law and Social Inquiry, 25: 817-843.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 151 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 532 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.