Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 23
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Glassmann, Ulrich 2016. Social Rights, Family Networks and Regional Varieties of Capitalism in Mediterranean Countries. Regional Studies, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 35.

    Grzymala-Busse, Anna 2016. The Difficulty with Doctrine: How Religion Can Influence Politics. Government and Opposition, Vol. 51, Issue. 02, p. 327.

    Jaime-Castillo, Antonio M. Fernández, Juan J. Valiente, Celia and Mayrl, Damon 2016. Collective religiosity and the gender gap in attitudes towards economic redistribution in 86 countries, 1990–2008. Social Science Research, Vol. 57, p. 17.

    Ravallion, Martin 2015.

    Scherer, Margarete 2015. The Religious Context in Explaining Public Support for the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 53, Issue. 4, p. 893.

    Wilson, Nicholas Hoover and Adams, Julia 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.

    Jordan, Jason 2014. Religious Belief, Religious Denomination, and Preferences for Redistribution: A Comparison across 13 Countries. West European Politics, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 19.

    VanHeuvelen, Tom 2014. The Religious Context of Welfare Attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 53, Issue. 2, p. 268.

    Jeene, Marjolein van Oorschot, Wim and Uunk, Wilfred 2013. Popular Criteria for the Welfare Deservingness of Disability Pensioners: The Influence of Structural and Cultural Factors. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 110, Issue. 3, p. 1103.

    Rice, Deborah 2013. Beyond Welfare Regimes: From Empirical Typology to Conceptual Ideal types. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 47, Issue. 1, p. 93.

    Wolf, Christof and Roßteutscher, Sigrid 2013. Religiosität und politische Orientierung – Radikalisierung, Traditionalisierung oder Entkopplung?. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 65, Issue. S1, p. 149.

    Davie, Grace 2012. A European Perspective on Religion and Welfare: Contrasts and Commonalities. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 11, Issue. 04, p. 589.

    Grzymala-Busse, Anna 2012. Why Comparative Politics Should Take Religion (More) Seriously. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 421.

    Jawad, Rana 2012. Religion, Social Welfare and Social Policy in the UK: Historical, Theoretical and Policy Perspectives. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 11, Issue. 04, p. 553.

    Stegmueller, D. Scheepers, P. Rossteutscher, S. and de Jong, E. 2012. Support for Redistribution in Western Europe: Assessing the role of religion. European Sociological Review, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 482.

    Aurich, Patrizia 2011. Aktivierungsreformen und die gesellschaftliche Mitte: Einstellungen im europäischen Vergleich. Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 60, Issue. 12, p. 295.

    Sorensen, Kerstin 2011. Party Platforms and Public Childcare: Structural and Ideational Factors Shaping Policy in Norway and Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies, p. no.

    Villadsen, Kaspar 2011. Modern Welfare And ‘Good Old’ Philanthropy. Public Management Review, Vol. 13, Issue. 8, p. 1057.

    Emmenegger, Patrick 2010. Catholicism, Job Security Regulations and Female Employment: A Micro-level Analysis of Esping-Andersen's Social Catholicism Thesis. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 20.

    Kalyvas, Stathis N. and van Kersbergen, Kees 2010. Christian Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 183.


the religious roots of modern poverty policy: catholic, lutheran, and reformed protestant traditions compared

  • sigrun kahl (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 09 September 2005

this paper shows that religion is a basic principle that underlies modern poverty policy. however, it has played out in very different ways in societies according to the relative predominance of catholic, lutheran, and calvinist heritages. though religion is but one explanation for why we deal with the poor as we do today, systematically accounting for denominational differences in poor relief traditions can help to answer a series of otherwise perplexing cross-national differences in poverty policy and enrich existing explanations of the welfare state.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *