Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T15:01:32.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2304 – Relationships Between Psychopathological Dimensions, Cognitive Deficits And Functional Capacity/real-life Functioning In Patients With Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

P. Bucci
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy
G. Piegari
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy
M. Chieffi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy
A. Mucci
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy
S. Galderisi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy
M. Maj
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An impairment of functional capacity and real-life functioning has widely been reported in patients with schizophrenia, even when clinical remission has been achieved. The relative contribution of negative symptoms and neurocognitive deficits to such an impairment is still debated.

In the present study, we investigated the relationships of functional capacity and real-life functioning with psychopathology and cognitive deficits in 35 schizophrenia patients, all treated with new-generation antipsychotics.

The MATRICS Cognitive Consensus Battery was used to assess cognitive functions. Real-life functioning was evaluated with the Quality of Life Scale (QLS). Functional capacity was assessed with the Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B). Psychopathological dimensions were calculated from PANSS items. Multiple Regression Analyses (MRA) were conducted, in which dependent variables were the indices of functional capacity/real life functioning while independent variables were psychopathological dimensions, neurocognitive indices, general abilities and education.

The results of MRA on the QLS indices showed the following percentages of variance explained: negative psychopathological dimension, 64% for “intrapsychic functions” and 46% for “interpersonal relationships”; speed of processing, 13% for “work functioning” and 11% for “interpersonal relationships”; visual learning, 12% for “work functioning”; positive psychopathological dimension, 11% for “intrapsychic functions” and 5% for “interpersonal relationships”; working memory, 7% for “intrapsychic functions”. As to the MRA on UPSA-B total score, working memory explained 57% of the variance while speed of processing explained 12% of it.

Our findings suggest that both negative symptoms and cognitive impairment have a strong relationship with real-life functioning while cognitive impairment is the only aspect associated to functional capacity.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.