Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T02:54:34.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An overview of the report of the national commission on sleep disorders research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

T Roth*
Affiliation:
Sleep Disorder and Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital, 2921 West Grand Bld, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
Get access

Summary

The National Comission on Sleep Disorder Research evaluated the status of insomnia and other sleep disorders in the US. The Commission found that insomnia is prevalent affecting 20–30 million Americans, has significant morbidity especially related to attention and memory processes and cost the US an estimated $ 15 billion a year. It also estimated that all of these figures should rise significantly by the year 2000. Other sleep disorders (eg, narcolepsy and sleep apnea) although less prevalent have significant costs to patients and society associated with them. The Commission recommended that the US develop a research and education program to develop new insights into the basic mechanisms of sleep disorder. The education program needs to be directed to the general public; medical practitioners, as well as patients.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, MSNarcolepsy. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 389–94Google ScholarPubMed
Ford, DEKamerow, DBEpidemologic study of sleep disturbancees and psychiatric disorders. JAMA 1989; 262: 1479–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, GDBalter, MBUhlenhuth, EHInsomnia and its treatment: prevalence and correlates. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985; 42: 225–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Commission of Sleep Disorders Research Wake up America: a national sleep alert Executive Summary and Executive Report 1993;1Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.