Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T07:13:15.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decision-making strategies are inconsistent in schizophrenia: Results from the Ultimatum game

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

P. Polgár
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
G. Csukly
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
L. Tombor
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
J. Réthelyi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
S. Kéri
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine, Szeged, Hungary National Psychiatry Center, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Impaired social cognition is a characteristic feature of schizophrenia, which is associated with the level of community functioning. Socioeconomic games are well-established in behavioral economy and widely used to examine decision-making strategies. They can also provide a useful method in the investigation of social decision-making in psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia. The strength of these games compared to classic paradigms is that they allow observing subjects directly engaged in interpersonal situations, thus real-time interactions with implicit processes become available to investigation.

Aims

Investigating decision-making strategies in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.

Methods

29 healthy controls and 58 patients with schizophrenia were compared by a series of Ultimatum Game interactions in a computerized setting. In this game two players have to split a sum of money. The proposer offers a portion to the responder, who decides to either accept or reject the offer. Rejection results in no income to either of the parties. Cognitive testing included emotion recognition, memory and executive function. Symptoms were assessed by MINI 5.0 and Positive and Negative Symptom Scale.

Results

Association between offer and probability of acceptance was different in schizophrenia patients and controls (Chi2 = 18.8, n = 87, df = 4, p = 0.0009): schizophrenia was associated with an increased likelihood of acceptance at lower offers and a decreased likelihood of acceptance at higher offers. Ratio of inconsistent decisions was significantly higher in the schizophrenia group (Chi2 = 4.7, df = 1, p = 0.03).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that schizophrenia patients are impaired in socioeconomic interactions requiring decision-making, which may result in unstable behavioral strategies.

Type
P03-308
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.