Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T07:36:21.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emergency state in COVID-19 pandemic: Hungarian patients’ experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

L. Pogany*
Affiliation:
Department Of General Psychiatry B, Nyírő Gyula National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions, Budapest, Hungary Janos Szentagothai Doctoral School Of Neurosciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
A. Horváth
Affiliation:
Department Of General Psychiatry B, Nyírő Gyula National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions, Budapest, Hungary
E. Rozsavolgyi
Affiliation:
Ambulatory Mental Health Service, Zugló Health Service, Budapest, Hungary Department Of General Psychiatry D, Nyírő Gyula Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions, Budapest, Hungary
A. Slezák
Affiliation:
Ambulatory Care Service, Nyírő Gyula Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions, Budapest, Hungary
J. Lazary
Affiliation:
Department Of General Psychiatry B, Nyírő Gyula National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions, Budapest, Hungary
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic made neccessary the declaration of emergency state in Hungary from 11 March 2020 to 18 June 2020. During this period hospitals were reserved for emergency use, ambulatory care was limited and replaced by telemedicine.

Objectives

We assessed the opinions of patients of two ambulatory psychiatric care units in Budapest regarding the emergency state.

Methods

We enrolled 438 outpatients in the survey (305 women and 133 men, mean age:51.9±16.2 years).Our questionnaire comprised 10 items on emotions and mental state and a 12 item „Problem evaluation scale”(included ’Fear’, ’Isolation’ and ’Health status’ subscales).General linear model (GLM), pairwise comparison and Tukey’s post hoc test were performed.

Results

Up to 34% of patients considered that their condition worsened during this period, but 12% of them thought that this was not related to emergency state. Twice as many participants (12.8%) were concerned about their financial situation than about their health status (6.1%). Worsening health status, higher fear and more common adaptation difficulties were reported by patients < 50 years, than by subjects> 50 years (p=0.001; p=0.045; p=0.003). Isolation caused higher distress among women than in men (p=0.003). The abundance of information caused higher distress in patients with anxiety disorder than with psychotic disorders (p=0.024).Patients with affective disorders perceived higher vulnerability compared to subjects with psychotic disorders (p=0.004).

Conclusions

Adaptation difficulties were reported by the half of the sample.Depletion of psychological resources can be expected during the next stage of the pandemic.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.