Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-lpd2x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:33:24.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of a newly implemented crisis-resolution and home-treatment team in munich – a mixed-methods-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

J. Boyens*
Affiliation:
Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Psychiatrie Und Psychotherapie, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
P. Brieger
Affiliation:
Direction, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum, Haar, Germany
J. Hamann
Affiliation:
Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Psychiatrie Und Psychotherapie, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Challenged by the lack of collaboration between treatment sectors in psychiatric care in Germany, a legal basis for the implementation of Stationsäquivalente Behandlung (StäB), a programme for crisis resolution and home treatment (CRHT), was formed in 2017. It offers intensive care to patients with severe mental illness in their own living environments, carried out by a team of diverse professionals.

Objectives

The present analysis is the first to evaluate the CRHT-program that has been established in the greater Munich area in 2018.

Methods

Qualitative and quantitative data were collected within the framework of a mixed-methods-analysis. Records of all patients (N=139) included in the CRHT over a thirteen-month period (’18–’19) were examined regarding sociodemographic, clinical parameters, and treatment data. A focus group with StäB-employees (N=8) and individual interviews with patients (N=10) were conducted, then transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

139 patients (74% female) were treated in 164 cases for 38 days on average. Main diagnoses were schizophrenic diseases (43%) and mood disorders (35%), with patients ranging from markedly to severely ill (mean CGI-S: 5.8). 9.4% were in postpartum. Qualitative analysis is still in progress. Preliminary results demonstrate positive responses to individual treatment and environmental integration, whereas frequently changing contacts and the logistical effort were seen critically.

Conclusions

Work is still in progress. We expect StäB to be an adequate alternative to inpatient treatment for women in puerperium and a new opportunity for patients who need intensive treatment but refuse hospitalisation.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.