Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T07:00:15.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring the Prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder Among Palliative Patients – Comparing Four Sets of Diagnostic Criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
S. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
J. Gill
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Depression is a common among palliative care patients but the reported prevalence varies in studies. This is due to the overlapping of the conventional diagnostic criteria with the somatic symptoms in palliative patients. Alternative diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) were introduced. However, the standard method to diagnose depression in palliative setting has not been established.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of MDD among palliative care patients by comparing between four sets of diagnostic criteria.

Methods

This is a cross sectional study conducted at two hospitals in Malaysia. Palliative patients were interviewed for presence of depression based on DSM – IV Criteria,Modified DSM – IV Criteria,Cavanaugh Criteria and Endicott's Criteria. They were also requested to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Results

The prevalence of MDD among palliative care patients was the highest for Modified DSM – IV Criteria (23.3%), followed by Endicott Criteria (13.8%), DSM – IV Criteria (9.2%) and Cavanaugh Criteria (5%). It was found that 9 items: DSM – IV Criteria Item 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8; and Endicott Criteria Item 6 and 7 have the ability to differentiate between depressed and non depressed patients. The prevalence based on these 9 items (which we named as ‘Revised’ Diagnostic Criteria) is 10.8%.

Conclusion

The prevalence of depression varies depending on the criteria used. A ‘revised diagnostic criteria’ was formed for more accurate determination of depression in palliative patients.

Type
Article: 0717
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.