Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:22:21.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pervasive refusal syndrome: comparing and contrasting clinical cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

V. Grahame
Affiliation:
Fleming Nuffield Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
C. Reid
Affiliation:
Fleming Nuffield Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
S. Rao
Affiliation:
Fleming Nuffield Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
S. Guirguis
Affiliation:
Fleming Nuffield Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
C. Kaplan
Affiliation:
Fleming Nuffield Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Pervasive Refusal Syndrome (PRS) is a relatively new diagnostic concept, that describes a rare and potentially life threatening condition, in which children refuse to walk.

talk, eat, drink, engage in self care, and take part in day to day activities (Lask et al, 1991).

PRS is not included in any of the psychiatric classification systems (ICD 10, DSM IV), although consensus exists within the literature as to its existence. Lask comments in his paper on Pervasive Refusal Syndrome that he has consulted on only 50 cases worldwide (Lask, 2004).

Objectives

The authors will share their clinical experience of treating seven new cases of PRS in a Regional CAMHS inpatient hospital. Patients with PRS often require hospital admission for assessment and exclusion of other medical, neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, because of the rarity many medical and psychiatric professionals have little experience of the treatment and rehabilitation required.

Methods

The specific MDT management approach necessary to meet the complex needs of patients with PRS will be discussed, as treatment is often counterintuitive, and some approaches can result in deterioration rather than improvement.

Results

In terms of improvement and recovery from the disorder, less is known about long term follow-up, as only a few studies have reported on immediate outcome. The authors have undertaken a long term follow-up (in press) and will discuss issues relating to prognosis.

Conclusion

A specific MDT treatment approach for PRS will be discussed, alongside the clinical decisions and dilemmas involved in following this approach.

Type
P01-290
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.