Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-20T05:24:52.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Safety hazards in clinical practice of seclusion in psychiatric care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

J. Varpula*
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Department Of Nursing Science, Turku, Finland
M. Välimäki
Affiliation:
Central South University, Xiangya School Of Nursing, Changsha Hunan, China
T. Lantta
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Department Of Nursing Science, Turku, Finland
J. Berg
Affiliation:
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Health And Well-being, Turku, Finland
P. Soininen
Affiliation:
Helsinki University Hospital, Department Of Psychiatry, Helsinki, Finland
M. Lahti
Affiliation:
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Health And Well-being, Turku, Finland
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Seclusion is part of the clinical practice in European psychiatric hospital care with the aim to maintain the safety of patients and staff. Adverse events and harm have been reported for patients and staff resulting from seclusion. Safety hazards, which are the prerequisite of adverse events, can be identified using video observation methods. Identifying safety hazards can be used to prevent adverse events and improve the quality of psychiatric care.

Objectives

To identify safety hazards during seclusion in psychiatric hospital care.

Methods

Descriptive design with non-participant video-observation of seclusion care practice. Data consisted of video recordings (n = 36) from six wards of one psychiatric hospital in Finland. The data were analysed with inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Clinical practice of seclusion included safety hazards stemming from the actions of patients and staff. Patients’ actions were as follows: aggressive behaviour, attempting to escape, precarious movements, preventing the visibility of staff, exposing themselves to contamination, and falls during seclusion. Staff actions included: leaving dangerous items to seclusion, issues in the administration of medication, performing physical and mechanical restraints in unsecure way, and precarious movements and postures.

Conclusions

According to our results, the use of seclusion has safety hazards that can result in harm for patients and staff. To improve the quality and safety of seclusion in clinical practice, the guidelines, practices, and staff training need to consider the various safety hazards. While the work in Europe to abolish the use of seclusion is still in progress, this topic requires attention in clinical practice, education, and policymaking.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.