Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:09:32.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tattooing and Different Personalities; a Comparison Study of Turkish Criminals and Control Sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

R.H. Bingöl
Affiliation:
child and adolescent psychiatry dept., Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
N. Kocabasoglu
Affiliation:
Psychiatry dept., Istanbul UNiversity Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
E. Sen
Affiliation:
child and adolescent psychiatry dept., Istanbul UNiversity Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
P. Algedik
Affiliation:
child and adolescent psychiatry dept., Istanbul UNiversity Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
S. Cakabay
Affiliation:
volunteer, volunteer, Istanbul, Turkey
B.C. POYRAZ
Affiliation:
Psychiatry dept., Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
E. Unal
Affiliation:
Psychiatry dept., The council of forenscic medicine Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
T. Erdal
Affiliation:
Psychiatry dept., The council of forenscic medicine Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

The relationship of tattoos to the diagnosis of personality disorders was explored in a forensic psychiatric inpaitent hospital setting. It was hypothesized that a greater proportion of forensic inpaitents possessing tattoos had higher criminality and had personality disorders in compairison to the people with tattoos without criminal history. In this study we compared also the important sociodemographic caharctersitics of criminals with tattoos and the normal population with tattoos without criminality.

Method

Forensic male and female psychiatric paitents (N=42) were administered a semi-structured interview to determine the presence of tattoo. Personality disorder was determined after clinical psychiatric examination by 5 different spychiatrists and aditionally personality disorders criteria acording to DSM-5 were cehcked out. The same semi-structured interview was appilied on th control group withou personality disorder evaluation.

Results

Paitents with tattoos had a significantly less number of tattoos but tattoos on different areas of their body, and were more likely to have histories of substance abuse, sexual-abuse, unhappy childhood, enduring violence, taruamtic life-experiences, and suicidal attempts than non-criminals.

Conclusion

This is the first study of which compares the forensic psychiatric paitents with normal controls in means of tattoos, personality disorders and other demographic charactersitics performed in Turkey. We concluded that there is an interaction between criminality and tattoos but the reverse is not always true at least in our control sample.

Type
Article: 1412
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.