Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Gauja, Anika 2015. The Individualisation of Party Politics: The Impact of Changing Internal Decision-Making Processes on Policy Development and Citizen Engagement. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 89.


    Pastorella, Giulia 2015. Technocratic Governments in Europe: Getting the Critique Right. Political Studies, p. n/a.


    Farrell, David M. 2014. ‘Stripped Down’ or Reconfigured Democracy. West European Politics, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 439.


    van Biezen, Ingrid 2014. The End of Party Democracy as We Know It? A Tribute to Peter Mair. Irish Political Studies, Vol. 29, Issue. 2, p. 177.


    Farrell, David M. O'Malley, Eoin and Suiter, Jane 2013. Deliberative Democracy in Action Irish-style: The 2011We the CitizensPilot Citizens' Assembly. Irish Political Studies, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 99.


    ×

Making Representations: Modes and Strategies of Political Parties

  • Michael Saward (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1062798708000252
  • Published online: 01 July 2008
Abstract

This article critically addresses the varied ways in which political parties can be said to represent. Three important ideal-typical modes of party representation are outlined: the popular, the statal, and the reflexive. Arguments are offered for countering the common view that, for example, popular modes are the most democratic, and statal modes the least democratic. Statal modes in particular are often taken to be an indicator of a decline in parties’ representative functions; however, shifting modes of party representation often have more to do with strategic choices and contextual pressures than democratic ideals. No one ideal-typical mode is intrinsically more democratic than others. Further, there is evidence that a new mode of party representation, the reflexive, may be emerging; parties may be transforming into something they never were in order to continue to do the things they have always sought to do. Whether democracy is unthinkable save for political parties is no longer the question we need to ask. Rather, we need to ask: what kinds of representative democracy are thinkable? And what forms of party claims, if any, are appropriate to them?

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: m.j.saward@open.c.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

3.M. Saward (2006) The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory, 5, 297318.

4.I. van Biezen (2003) The place of parties in contemporary democracies. West European Politics, 26, 171184, p. 172.

12. See the discussion in R. S. Katz and P. Mair (1995) Changing models of party organisation and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1, 528.

16. It is not clear, however, that this process results in states being less powerful, rather than differently powerful. See M. Saward (1997) In search of the hollow crown. In: P. Weller , H. Bakvis and R. A. W. Rhodes (eds) The Hollow Crown (London: Macmillan).

21.J. Derrida (2004) The last of the rogue states: the ‘democracy to come’. South Atlantic Quarterly, 103, 323341.

22. See C. Fieschi (2007) How British parties lost our favour. Parliamentary Affairs, 60, 143152.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Review
  • ISSN: 1062-7987
  • EISSN: 1474-0575
  • URL: /core/journals/european-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×