Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Obsolescence of almost all theories concerning International Relations


The implosion of the Soviet empire undermined most theories concerning International Relations. Only a few political scientists have conceded afterwards the weakness of their theories, which were mostly ahistorical, based on the deformation of politics with history omitted. The question asked in this article is what kind of International Relations as a discipline may be more reliable and helpful in the future.

Hide All
1.Holsti K. (1993) International relations at the end of the millenium. Review of International Studies 19, (1993), 408.
2.Kissinger H. (1994) Diplomacy (New York) pp. 804835.
3.Kratochwil F. (1993) The embarassment of changes; neorealism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of International Studies, 19 80.
4.Hoffmann S. (1977) An American social science: international relations Daedelus, 20, 59.
5.Rosenau J. (1996) Probing puzzles persistently: a desirable but improbable function for I.R. theory. In Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M. (eds.), International Theory, Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge) pp. 309317.
6.Wight M. (1996) Why is there no international theory?, In Butterfield H. and Wight M. (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations. Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London) pp. 1734.
7.Knudsen T. L. (1992) A History of International Relations (Manchester) p. 3.
8.Bremer S. A. (1992) Dangerous dyads: conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36, 309341.
9.Siccama J. G. (1993) Realistische en idealistische perspectevieven op Europese veiligheid. Een kwantitatief-historische toetsing. Transaktie, 22, 210224. See also Paul Schroeder's criticism of George Blainey's The Causes of War (Melbourne 1977) discussed in T. C. W. Banning (1994) P. W. Schroeder's concert of Europe, The International History Review 16, 713.
10.Gaddis J. L. (1992) International relations theory and the end of the Cold War. International Security, 17, 559.
11.Fisher D. H. (1970) Historians' Fallacies (New York), p. 90.
12.Mearshheimer J. (1990) Back to the future. Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15, 556. (Correspondence on this provocative article in the fall 1990 issue of the same journal).
13.Walker R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge) p. 6.
14.Gaddis J. L. (1993) The tragedy of Cold War history. Diplomatic History, 17, 116.
15.Nietzsche F. (1956) Werke, vol. 2 (Munich) p. 820.
16.Ruggie J. G. (1993) Territoriality and beyond; problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47, 139174.
17.Schmitter P. C. (1986) An introduction to Southern European transitions from authoritarian rule: Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. In O'Donnell G., Schmitter P. C. and Whitehead L. (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Prospects for Democracy (Baltimore) pp. 310.
18.Lebow R. N. and Risse-Kappen T. (eds) (1995) International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. (New York) p. 247.
19.Halliday F. (1995) International relations and discontents. International Affairs, 71, 746.
20.Joffe J. (1995) Bismark or Britain? Towards an American grand strategy after bipolarity International Security, 19, 94117.
21.Rosecrance R. (1973) International Relations: Peace or War? (New York) 25.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Review
  • ISSN: 1062-7987
  • EISSN: 1474-0575
  • URL: /core/journals/european-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.