Skip to main content



This paper argues that opportunities for reducing poverty, improving social justice, and influencing policy and institutional changes are being missed as a result of not learning enough from situations where positive changes in development indicators have already taken place. After a review of research on monitoring and evaluation (M&E), positive deviance and studies of ‘success' stories, three case studies of positive change are presented. These are the spread of bamboo tubewell irrigation in Bihar, changes in agricultural research and extension policy in Nepal, and the spread of groups and group-based organizations/federations in Nepal. General lessons include: (1) effective institutional innovation is always new and social arena specific, (2) many opportunistic social entrepreneurs are always present in arenas of positive social change, and (3) there is always purposive selection of what to observe, what to measure and what to publicize. Practical implications include: (1) strengthening social science research on understanding change in agricultural and natural resources systems, (2) selecting people for research and development intervention situations based not only on technical competence but also a track record of interest in social justice development principles, and (3) strengthening a broader concepts reflection and learning within current research and development interventions chan is currently practiced. While learning from the positive is a simple idea, it is always challenging to implement as it inevitably questions the histories, past explanations and perceptions of some scientists and development planners, especially those who promote a mainstream, formulaic approach to the design and promotion of best policies and best practices, and a simplistic, non-political/cultural approach to the transfer and scaling out and up of technology and institutional models.

Corresponding author
E-mail:; Current address: 28 St Keyna Avenue, Hove, Sussex, BN3 4PP, UK.
Hide All
Analoui F. (Ed.) (1994). The Realities of Managing Development Projects. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
Alex G. and Byerlee D. (2001). Monitoring and Evaluation for AKIS Projects: Framework and Options. AKIS Good Practice Note. The Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (AKIS) Thematic Team, Rural Development Family. Washington: World Bank. (Available at the World Bank website.)
Appu P. S. (1973). Unequal benefits from Kosi development: cost of bypassed institutional reform. Economic and Political Weekly 8:10761081.
Appu P. S. (1974). The bamboo tubewell: a low cost device for exploiting ground water. Economic and Political Weekly 9, no. 26.
Baum W. C. (1982). The Project Cycle, Economic Development Projects. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Biggs S. D. (1981). Monitoring for re-planning purposes: the role of R & D in river basin development. In River Basin Planning: Theory and Practice, 325342 (Eds Saha S. K. and Barrow C. J.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Biggs S. and Matsaert H. (2004). Strengthening poverty reduction programmes using an actor-oriented approach: examples from natural resources innovation systems. AgREN Networkpaper No. 134. London, Overseas Development Institute. Available from
Biggs S. and Messerschmidt D. (2005). Social responsibility in the growing handmade paper industry of Nepal. World Development 33:18211844.
Biggs S. and Smith S. (2003). Paradox of learning in project cycle management and the role of organizational culture. World Development 31:17431757.
Biggs S. D., Gurung S. M. and Messerschmidt D. (2005). An exploratory study of gender, social inclusion and empowerment through development groups and group-based organisations in Nepal: building on the positive. Report submitted to the Gender and Social Exclusion Assessment (GSEA) Study, National Planning Commission, World Bank and DFID, Kathmandu (Version 2, March 2005). (Available via:
Buvinić M. (1986). Projects for women in the Third World: explaining their misbehaviour. World Development 14:653–644.
Clay E. J. (1980). The economics of the bamboo tubewell: dispelling some myths about appropriate technology. CERES 13:4347.
Clay E. J. and Schaffer B. B. (Eds) (1984). Room for Manoeuvre: An Exploration of Public Policy in Agriculture and Rural Development. London: Heinemann.
Crewe E. and Harrison E. (1998) Whose Development. An Ethnography of Aid. London: Zed Books.
Douthwaite B. (2002). Enabling Innovation: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Fostering Technological Change. London: Zed Books.
Ferguson J. (1990). The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gellner D. and Hirsch E. (Eds) (2001). Inside Organizations: Anthropologist at Work. Oxford: Berg.
Gittinger J. P. (1982). Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects. 2nd Edn. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
GOB (Government of Bihar) 1969. Problems of Small Farmers of Kosi Area (Purnea and Saharsa Districts). Patna: Superintendent Secretariat Press, Government of Bihar.
Goetz A. M. (1996). Local heroes: patterns of fieldwork discretion in implementing GAD policy in Bangladesh. IDS Discussion Paper 358. Brighton UK: IDS, University of Sussex.
Griliches Z. (1958). Research costs and returns: hybrid corn and related innovations. Journal of Political Economy. 66:419431.
Gurung B. and Menter H. (2004). Mainstreaming gender-sensitive participatory approaches: the CIAT case study. In Scaling Up and Out: Achieving Widespread Impact Through Agricultural Research, 257285 (Ed. Pachico D.). Cali, Columbia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).
Hall A. J., Yoganand B., Sulaiman R. V. and Clark N. G. (Eds) (2004). Innovations in Innovation: Reflections on Partnership, Institutions and Learning. Patancheru and New Delhi: Crop Post-Harvest Programme (CPHP), International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), and National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NCAP/ICAR).
Hall A., Pehu E. and Rajaahti R. (2007). Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How To Go Beyond Strengthening Research System. Washington, DC: Agriculture and Rural Development Department, The World Bank.
Hammond S. A. and Royal C. (Eds) (1998). Lessons from the Field: Applying Appreciative Inquiry. Plano, TX, USA: Practical Press.
Hirschman A. O. (1967). Development Projects Observed. (Originally published in 1967 and reissued in 1995 with new preface.) Washington: Brookings Institute.
Hirschman A. O. (1995). Author's Preface: A hidden ambition. In Development Projects Observed, vii–xii (by A. O. Hirschman). (Originally published in 1967 and reissued with new preface.) Washington: Brookings Institute.
Horton D., Mackay R., Anderson A. and Dupleich L. (2000). Evaluating capacity development in planning, monitoring, and evaluation: a case from agricultural research. Research Report 17. The Hague: ISNAR.
Jain P. S. (1994). Managing for success: lessons from Asian development programs. World Development 22:13631377.
Jalal K. F., Ahmed Raisuddin and Ahmed S. (1974). Tubewell irrigation. A Report Based on the Visit of Bangladesh Study Team to India. Dhaka: Planning Commission, Government of Bangladesh.
KC L. M. (2003). A Qualitative Analysis of Production Credit for Rural Women (PCRW) and the Federation Process. Kathmandu: UNICEF.
Krishna A., Uphoff N. and Esman M. J. (Eds) (1998). Reasons for Hope: Instructive Experiences in Rural Development. West Hartford, USA: Kumarian Press.
Joshi K. D., Biggs S., Gauchan D., Devkota K. P., Devkota C. K., Shrestha P. K. and Sthapit B. R. (2006). The evolution and spread of socially responsible technical and institutional innovations in a rice improvement system in Nepal. Discussion Paper 8. Bangor, UK: CAZS Natural Resources, University of Wales.
Ladejinsky W. (1969). The green revolution in Bihar – the Kosi area: a field trip. Economic and Political Weekly 4 (36).
Lenne J. M. and Thomas D. (2005). Opportunities for increasing productivity and reducing poverty through crop–livestock integration in sub-Saharan Africa. In Pathways out of Poverty. Aspects of Applied Biology 75, 99108 (Eds Harris D., Richards J. I., Silverside P., Ward A. F. and Witcombe J. R.). Warwick, UK: Association of Applied Biologists.
Lewis D. J. (1998). Partnership as process: building an institutional ethnography of an inter-agency aquaculture project in Bangladesh. In Development as a Process: Concepts and Methods for Working with Complexity, 99115 (Eds Mosse D., Farrington J. and Rew A.). London and New York: ODI and Routledge.
Lewis D. and Mosse D. (Eds) (2006). Development Brokers and Translators: The Ethnography of Aid and Agencies. Bloomfield, USA: Kumarian Press.
Lievesley D. (2006). Measuring what matters: Statistics as a tool of empowerment for developing countries. The Gladwyn Lecture, presented at the Moses Room, Houses of Parliament, Westminster, 28 November 2006.
Long N. and Van Der Ploeg J. D. (1989). Demythologizing planned intervention: an actor perspective. Sociolgia Ruralis 29:226249.
Merrill-Sands D., Ewell P., Biggs S. and McAllister J. (1989). Issues in institutionalizing on-farm client-oriented research: a review of experiences from nine national agricultural research systems. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 3:279300.
Messerschmidt D. (Ed.) (1981). Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One's Own Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Messerschmidt D. A. (1988). Success in small farmer development: paper making at Pang and Nanglibang, Nepal. World Development 16:733750.
Messerschmidt D. (2007). Evaluating appreciative inquiry as an organizational transformation tool: a case study from Nepal. (Draft available from the author.)
Mosse D. (2005). Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press.
Mosse D. (2006). Anti-social anthropology? Objectivity, objection, and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (NS) 12:935956.
Mosse D. and Lewis D. (Eds) (2005). The Aid Effect: Giving and Governing in Global Development. London: Pluto.
Mosse D., Farrington J. and Rew A. (Eds) (1998) Development as a Process: Concepts and Methods for Working with Complexity. London and New York: ODI and Routledge.
Ochieng C. M. O. (2007). Development through positive deviance and its implications for economic policy making and public administration in Africa: the case of Kenyan agricultural development, 1930–2005. World Development in press.
Rhoades R. E. (2005). Seeking half our brains: reflections on the social context of interdisciplinary research and development. In Understanding Culture in Agriculture (Eds Cernea M. and Kasam A..). Oxford, UK: CAB International.
Rondinelli D. A. (1992). Development Projects as Policy Experiments: An Adaptive Approach to Development Administration (2nd Edn). London: Routledge.
Rossi B. (2004). Order and disjuncture: theoretical shifts in the anthropology of aid and development. Current Anthropology 45:556560.
Sternin J. (2003). Positive deviance: a new paradigm for addressing today's problems today. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 5:5762.
Tendler J. (1997). Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University.
Thomas J. W. (1975). The choice of technology for irrigation tubewells in East Pakistan: an analysis of a development policy decision. In The Choice of Technology in Developing Countries: Some Cautionary Tales, 3367 (Eds Timmer P. C., Thomas J. W., Wells L. T. and Morawetz D.). Harvard: Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
Uphoff N., Esman M. J. and Krishna A. (Eds) (1998). Reasons for Success: Learning from Instructive Experiences in Rural Development. West Hartford, USA: Kumarian Press.
Van Mele P., Salahuddin A. and Magor N. (Eds) (2005). Innovations in Rural Extension: Case Studies from Bangladesh. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
Yunus M. and Latifee H. I. (1975). A report on Bamoil Co-operative Farm, Comilla. Locally Sponsored Development Programme Series Report No. 3 (Rural Studies Project, Department of Economics, Chittagong University, Bangladesh). Bangladesh: Ministry of Cooperatives, Local Government and Rural Development.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Experimental Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0014-4797
  • EISSN: 1469-4441
  • URL: /core/journals/experimental-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 40 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 252 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.