Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T13:25:04.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical macro-finance, Post Keynesian monetary theory and emerging economies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Bruno Bonizzi*
University of Hertfordshire, UK
Annina Kaltenbrunner
University of Leeds, UK
Corresponding author: Bruno Bonizzi, HertfordshireBusiness School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]


Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In our contribution to this forum, we suggest that critical macro-finance (CMF) scholars and Post Keynesian monetary theorists would profit from a more explicit engagement with each other. Post Keynesian scholars would benefit from the detailed empirical insights that CMF provides, particularly through its analysis of non-bank financial institutions and the conceptual focus on liquidity and liabilities. Meanwhile, the CMF literature would benefit from more explicit grounding in earlier Post Keynesian concepts. In particular, the theory of liquidity preference, the concept of the liquidity premium, and the theory of endogenous money highlight macroeconomic issues missing from CMF scholarship.

Forum: Critical macro-finance
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (, which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
© 2020 The Author(s)


Bell, S. (1998) The hierarchy of money. Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, 231.Google Scholar
Bonizzi, B. (2017) An alternative Post Keynesian framework for understanding capital flows to emerging markets. Journal of Economic Issues, 15(1): 137–62.Google Scholar
Bonizzi, B. and Kaltenbrunner, A. (2018) Liability driven investment and pension fund exposure to emerging markets: A Minskyan analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(2): 420–39.Google Scholar
Bonizzi, B. and Kaltenbrunner, A. (forthcoming) An alternative Minskyan framework of capital flows and exchange rate dynamics in developing and emerging economies. In: Bonizzi, B., Kaltenbrunner, A. and Ramos, R. (eds.) Financial Integration and Exchange Rates in Emerging Economies: The Contribution of Post Keynesian Economics. London: Routledge, in press.Google Scholar
Botta, A., Caverzasi, E. and Capelli, C. (2019) Shadow banking and the financial side of financialisation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43: 1029–51.Google Scholar
Bouguelli, R. (2019) Is shadow banking really akin to banking? A critical analysis in light of monetary theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 43(1): 127.Google Scholar
Carvalho, F.J.C. (1992) Mr. Keynes and the Post Keynesians. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chick, V. (1983) Macroeconomics After Keynes. Oxford: Philip Alan.Google Scholar
Chick, V. and Dow, S. (2002) Monetary policy with endogenous money and liquidity preference: A nondualistic treatment. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 24(4): 587607.Google Scholar
Cottrell, A. (1994) Post Keynesian monetary economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(6): 587605.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. (1978) Money and the Real World. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
de Souza Lima Orsi, B. (2019) Currency Internationalisation and Currency Hierarchy in Emerging Economies: The Role of the Brazilian Real. Doctoral thesis (PhD), University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Dow, S.C. (1996) Horizontalism: A critique. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20(4): 497508.Google Scholar
Dow, A. and Dow, S.C. (1989) Endogenous money creation and idle balances. In: Pheby, J. (ed.) New Directions in Post Keynesian Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 147–64.Google Scholar
Gabor, D. (2016) The (impossible) repo trinity: The political economy of repo markets. Review of International Political Economy, 23(6): 9671000.Google Scholar
Gabor, D. (2020) Critical macro-finance: A theoretical lens. Finance and Society, 6(1): 4555.Google Scholar
Gabor, D. and Vestergaard, J (2016) Towards a theory of shadow money. INET Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Gnos, C. (2006) French circuit theory. In: Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (eds.) A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 87104.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1985) The Scourge of Monetarism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaltenbrunner, A. (2015) A Post Keynesian framework of exchange rate determination: A Minskyan approach. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 38(3): 426–48.Google Scholar
Kaltenbrunner, A. and Painceira, J.P. (2015) Developing countries’ changing nature of financial integration and new forms of external vulnerability: The Brazilian experience. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5): 1281–306.Google Scholar
Kaltenbrunner, A. and Painceira, J.P. (2017) The impossible trinity: Inflation targeting, exchange rate management and open capital accounts in emerging economies. Development and Change, 48(3): 452–80.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1937) The general theory of employment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2): 209–23.Google Scholar
Kregel, J.A. (1988) The multiplier and liquidity preference: Two sides of the theory of effective demand. In: Barrère A. (ed.) The Foundations of Keynesian Analysis. London: Palgrave, 231–50.Google Scholar
Lavoie, M. (1984) The endogenous flow of credit and the Post Keynesian theory of money. Journal of Economic Issues, 18(3): 771–97.Google Scholar
Lavoie, M. (2019) Advances in the Post Keynesian theory of money and finance. In: Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (eds.) Frontiers of Heterodox Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 89129.Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. (2000) Minsky and modern finance: The case of Long Term Capital Management. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 26(2): 8188.Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. (2010) The New Lombard Street: How the Fed Became the Dealer of Last Resort. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. (2012). The inherent hierarchy of money. In: Taylor, L., Rezai, A. and Thomas, M. (eds.) Social Fairness and Economics: Economic Essays in the Spirit of Duncan Foley. London: Routledge, 394405.Google Scholar
Michell, J. (2017) Do shadow banks create money? ‘Financialisation’ and the monetary circuit. Metroeconomica, 68(2): 354–77.Google Scholar
Minsky, H.P. (1975) John Maynard Keynes. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Minsky, H.P. (1980) Capitalist financial processes and the instability of capitalism. Journal of Economic Issues, 12(2): 505–23.Google Scholar
Minsky, H.P. (1982) Can “It” Happen Again? Essays in Instability and Finance. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Minsky, H.P. (1986) Stabilizing and Unstable Economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, B.J. (1979) The endogenous money stock. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2(1): 4970.Google Scholar
Murau, S. and Pforr, T. (2020) What is money in a critical macro-finance framework? Finance and Society, 6(1): 5666.Google Scholar
Neilson, D. (2019) Minsky. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Pozsar, Z. (2014) Shadow banking: The money view. Office of Financial Research Working Paper, 04.Google Scholar
Realfonzo, R. (2006) The Italian circuitist approach. In: Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (eds.) A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 105–20.Google Scholar
Sissoko, C. (2019) Repurchase agreements and the (de) construction of financial markets. Economy and Society, 48(3): 315–41.Google Scholar
Wray, R. (1992) Alternative theories of the rate of interest. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16(1): 6989.Google Scholar