Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T13:14:47.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revaluation fantasy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Fabian Muniesa*
Affiliation:
Mines Paris at PSL University, France
*
Corresponding author: Fabian Muniesa, Centre deSociologie de l'Innovation, Mines Paris, 60 Boulevard Saint-Michel, 75006Paris, France. Email: fabian.muniesa@minesparis.psl.eu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Financial conspiracies today blend together antisemitic tropes and spiritual visions with ideals of political reform and economic salvation. It is tempting to locate such phenomena at the periphery of the financial order, situating them within a delusional space beyond judicious concepts of money, finance, wealth, and value. But is also possible to take paranoid finance as an extreme, radical appropriation of a logic inherent in finance.

Type
Forum: Edges of the financial imagination
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)

References

Barkun, M. (2003) A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520238053.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockford, S. (2022) How to manifest abundance: Money and the rematerialization of exchange in Sedona, Arizona, USA. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 28(3): 920–37.10.1111/1467-9655.13772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, N. (2014) The Social Life of Money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400852048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenster, M. (2008) Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, S. (2020) Silicon Valley, disruption, and the end of uncertainty. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(2): 169–84.10.1080/17530350.2019.1684337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, P. (2000) Conspiracy Theory: From the Kennedy Assassination to The X-Files. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Komporozos-Athanasiou, A. (2022) Speculative Communities: Living with Uncertainty in a Financialized World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226816012.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2017) On the political vernaculars of value creation. Science as Culture, 26(4): 445–54.10.1080/09505431.2017.1354847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2022) Paranoid finance. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 89(3): 731–56.10.1353/sor.2022.0041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F. and Doganova, L. (2020) The time that money requires: Use of the future and critique of the present in financial valuation. Finance and Society, 6(2): 95113.10.2218/finsoc.v6i2.5269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, H. (2014) The limits of financial imagination: Free investors, efficient markets, and crisis. American Anthropologist, 116(1): 3850.10.1111/aman.12071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postone, M. (1980) Anti-Semitism and National Socialism: Notes on the German reaction to “Holocaust”. New German Critique, 19(1): 97115.10.2307/487974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M. (2021) The Storm is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.Google Scholar
Samman, A. (2022) Eternal return on capital: Nihilistic repetition in the asset economy. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 23(1): 165–81.10.1080/1600910X.2020.1763416CrossRefGoogle Scholar