Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-pkhfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T22:57:12.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The time of money in finance and US society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Elena Esposito*
Affiliation:
University of Bielefeld, Germany/University of Modena-Reggio Emilia, Italy
*
Corresponding author: Elena Esposito, Fakultät für Soziologie, Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany. Email: elena.esposito@unimore.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Traditional societies were defined by a prevalence of the past in the definition of the present. United States (US) society seems to show the opposite trend: the present is defined as the preparation of the future. Financial temporality can be seen as an example of the present use of the future, transforming future possibilities into available wealth. As the financial crisis has shown, however, the temporality of the future is more complex and circular. This article deals with quantitative easing (QE) as a financial instrument with an essentially temporal nature (in the sense that it uses time and acts on the future and on expectations). The success of QE in the US economy reveals essential aspects of US temporality, but also raises questions as to how it may differ from European temporality. The analysis of QE measures and their impact also offers ways to assess whether and by which means politics can intervene into finance, as well as what consequences and uncertainties are created in the process.

Type
Essay
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2018 The Author(s)

References

Baglioni, A. (2015) Perchè la Bce sceglie ancora il Quantitative easing. Lavoce.info [Online], 13 November. Available at: <http://www.lavoce.info/archives/38316/perche-la-bce-sceglie-ancora-il-quantitative-easing/>. Accessed 30 January 2018..+Accessed+30+January+2018.>Google Scholar
Callon, M., Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F. (eds.) (2007) Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Di Colli, S. (2015) Con il Qe torna la fiducia. Lavoce.info [Online], 15 May. Available at: <http://www.lavoce.info/archives/34733/con-il-qe-torna-la-fiducia/>. Accessed 30 January 2018..+Accessed+30+January+2018.>Google Scholar
Esposito, E. (2013) The structures of uncertainty: Performativity and unpredictability in economic operations. Economy and Society, 42(1): 102–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (1979) Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Harding, R. (2014) US quantitative measures worked in defiance of theory. Financial Times, 13 October. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/3b164d2e-4f03-11e4-9c88-00144feab7de>. Accessed 29 May 2018..+Accessed+29+May+2018.>Google Scholar
Ingham, G. (2004) The Nature of Money. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Le Goff, J. (1986) La bourse et la vie: Economie et religion au Moyen Age. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2006) An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2009) Material Markets: How Economic Agents Are Constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. (eds.) (2007) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1973/1939) Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, translated by Nicolaus, M.. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Monacelli, T. (2011) Una ricetta per l'Europa: il Quantitative Easing. Lavoce.info [Online], 8 August. Available at: <http://www.lavoce.info/archives/27098/una-ricetta-per-leuropa-il-quantitative-easing/>. Accessed 30 January 2018.. Accessed 30 January 2018.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Monacelli,+T.+(2011)+Una+ricetta+per+l'Europa:+il+Quantitative+Easing.+Lavoce.info+[Online],+8+August.+Available+at:+.+Accessed+30+January+2018.>Google Scholar
Monacelli, T. (2015a) Qe e inflazione: poche illusioni. Lavoce.info [Online], 3 November. Available at: <http://www.lavoce.info/archives/38149/qe-e-inflazione-poche-illusioni/>. Accessed 30 January 2018..+Accessed+30+January+2018.>Google Scholar
Monacelli, T. (2015b) Una politica monetaria timida per una grande stagnazione. Lavoce.info [Online], 4 December. Available at: <http://www.lavoce.info/archives/38763/una-politica-monetaria-timida-per-una-grande-stagnazione/>. Accessed 30 January 2018..+Accessed+30+January+2018.>Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L.S. (1972) Epistemic and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L.S. (1979) Imagination and the Nature of Choice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L.S. (1990) Time, Expectations and Uncertainty in Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sohn-Rethel, A. (1990) Das Geld, die bare Münze des Apriori. Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar