A comparison of the stability and efficiency of the Canadian and American banking systems, 1870–19251
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2008
- Copyright © European Association for Banking and Financial History 1996
2 Carr, J. L., Mathewson, F. and Quigley, N. C., Ensuring Failure: Financial System Stability and Deposit Insurance in Canada (Ottawa, 1994), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
4 Beckhart, B. H., ‘The banking system of Canada’, in Willis, H. P. and Beckhart, B. H. (eds), Foreign Banking Systems (London, 1929).Google Scholar
5 Urquhart, M. C. and Buckley, K. A. H. (eds), Historical Statistics of Canada (Toronto, 1965).Google Scholar
6 United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation [hereafter FDIC], Annual Report 1934, PP. 92–3.
11 As Neufeld, E. P., The Financial System of Canada (Toronto, 1972), p. 81, points out, the record of the chartered banks was also ‘more tarnished’ than that of other Canadian intermediaries.Google Scholar
13 The Fund was held by the Minister of Finance and the banks received interest of three per cent per annum on their contributions. MacIvor, R. C., Canadian Monetary, Banking and Fiscal Development (Toronto, 1961), p. 77.Google Scholar
14 Breckenridge, R. M., The History of Banking in Canada (Washington, DC, 1910), p. 123.Google Scholar
15 Losses on United States non-national banks deposits are also from FDIC, Annual Report 1934.
20 Friedman, M. and Schwartz, A. J., A Monetary History of the United States (Princeton, NJ, 1963), p. 438.Google Scholar
22 Sprague, O. M. W., History of Crises under the National Banking System (Washington, DC, 1910).Google Scholar
23 The FDIC Report for 1934, which we relied on to compute the estimates of deposit losses, is based on the Comptroller of the Currency's Annual Report (1896), pp. 52–7Google Scholar, for information concerning non-national bank losses.
26 Neufeld, , Financial System, p. 104Google Scholar, concludes that ‘loss of confidence in banks almost always resulted from their having made imprudent loans and investments or from suffering defalcations, and almost never from external forces over which the banks had no control’.
35 Bordo, M. D., Rappoport, P. and Schwartz, A. J., ‘Money versus credit rationing: evidence for the national banking era, 1880–1914’, in Goldin, C. and Rockoff, H. (eds), Strategic Factors in Nineteenth Century American Economic History: a Volume to Honor Robert W. Fogel (Chicago, 1992).Google Scholar
36 We have relied on Balke, N. S. and Gordon, R. J., ‘The estimation of pre-war gross national product: methodology and new evidence’, Journal of Political Economy, 97 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar for estimates of GNP, rather than Romer, C., ‘The pre-war business cycle reconsidered: new estimates of gross national product, 1869–1908’ Journal of Political Economy, 97 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, because the former appear to be closer methodologically to estimates of GNP for Canada in Urquhart, M. C., ‘New estimates of gross national product, Canada, 1870–1926: some implications for Canadian development’, in Engerman, S. L. and Gallman, R. E. (eds), Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, 51 (Chicago, 1986).Google Scholar
37 Friedman and Schwartz, Monetary History.
39 The implications of the differences in susceptibility to system-wide shocks for long-run macroeconomic stability, however, are unclear. On one hand Rich, G., The Cross of Gold: Money and the Canadian Business Cycle, 1867–1913 (Ottawa, 1988), p. 157Google Scholar, concluded that ‘Canadian GNP fluctuated less than its U.S. counterpart’. On the other hand, Williamson, S. D., ‘Implications on financial intermediaries and implications for aggregate fluctuations: Canada and the United States 1870–1913’, in Blanchard, O. J. and Fischer, S. (eds), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1989 (Cambridge, Mass., 1989), p. 332Google Scholar, relying on more recent estimates of US GNP (due to Romer, ‘Prewar business cycle’ and Balke and Gordon, ‘Estimation of prewar Gross National Product’), and a different method for detrending the data, found, depending on the measure of US GNP used, that Canadian GNP was 11% or 56% more volatile than US GNP, and that the GNP deflator was 9% or 54% more volatile. Indeed, Williamson concludes that branch banking, the absence of reserve requirements on deposits and bond backing requirements on notes in Canada produced greater sensitivity to real shocks in Canada.
41 Calomiris, C., ‘Regulation, industrial structure, and instability in U.S. banking: an historical perspective’, in Klausner, M. and White, L. J. (eds), Structural Change in Banking (Homewood, Ill., 1993), pp. 33–8.Google Scholar
42 MacIvor, R. C., Canadian Monetary, Banking and Fiscal Development (Toronto, 1961), p. 65.Google Scholar
44 United States National Monetary Commission, Interviews on the Banking and Currency Systems of Canada (Washington, DC, 1910), p. 181.Google Scholar
46 Timberlake, R. C. Jr, ‘The central banking role of clearinghouse associations’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 16 (1984)Google Scholar; Gorton, G., ‘Clearinghouses and the origins of central banking in the U.S.’, Journal of Economic History, 45 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Gorton, G. and Mullineaux, D. J., ‘The joint production of confidence: endogenous regulation and 19th century commercial bank clearinghouses’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 19 (1987).Google Scholar
47 Timberlake, R. C. Jr, The Origins of Central Banking in the United States (Cambridge, 1987). Some states developed early deposit insurance schemes, but none were successful in preventing major panics;Google ScholarCalomiris, C., ‘Is deposit insurance necessary? A historical perspective’, Journal of Economic History, 50 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 Bond, D., The merger movement in Canadian banking 1890–1920, some preliminary findings, University of British Columbia Discussion Paper, 21, p. 5.Google Scholar
51 Calomiris, , ‘Regulation’, pp. 58–62, for a complementary discussion of these ratios.Google Scholar
52 F. Capie, ‘Prudent and stable (but inefficient?): commercial banks in Britain’, and Hannah, L., ‘Effects of banking cartels’, both in Bordo, M. D. and Sylla, R. (eds), Anglo-American Financial Systems: Institutions and Markets in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1995).Google Scholar