Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 84
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bubak, Andrew N. Gerken, Alison R. Watt, Michael J. Costabile, Jamie D. Renner, Kenneth J. and Swallow, John G. 2016. Assessment strategies and fighting patterns in animal contests: a role for serotonin?. Current Zoology, Vol. 62, Issue. 3, p. 257.

    Mirth, Christen K Anthony Frankino, W and Shingleton, Alexander W 2016. Allometry and size control: what can studies of body size regulation teach us about the evolution of morphological scaling relationships?. Current Opinion in Insect Science, Vol. 13, p. 93.

    Muramatsu, K. and Akimoto, S. 2016. Spatiotemporal fluctuations in natural selection acting on the gall-parasitic aphidTetraneura sorini. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 29, Issue. 7, p. 1423.

    Stillwell, R. Craig Shingleton, Alexander W. Dworkin, Ian and Frankino, W. Anthony 2016. Tipping the scales: Evolution of the allometric slope independent of average trait size. Evolution, Vol. 70, Issue. 2, p. 433.

    Bath, Eleanor Wigby, Stuart Vincent, Claire Tobias, Joseph A. and Seddon, Nathalie 2015. Condition, not eyespan, predicts contest outcome in female stalk-eyed flies,Teleopsis dalmanni. Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 5, Issue. 9, p. 1826.

    Bolstad, Geir H. Cassara, Jason A. Márquez, Eladio Hansen, Thomas F. van der Linde, Kim Houle, David and Pélabon, Christophe 2015. Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing ofDrosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue. 43, p. 13284.

    Bubak, Andrew N. Rieger, Nathaniel S. Watt, Michael J. Renner, Kenneth J. and Swallow, John G. 2015. David vs. Goliath: Serotonin modulates opponent perception between smaller and larger rivals. Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 292, p. 521.

    Higginson, Dawn M. Badyaev, Alexander V. Segraves, Kari A. and Pitnick, Scott 2015. Causes of Discordance between Allometries at and above Species Level: An Example with Aquatic Beetles. The American Naturalist, Vol. 186, Issue. 2, p. 176.

    Bubak, Andrew N. Renner, Kenneth J. and Swallow, John G. 2014. Heightened serotonin influences contest outcome and enhances expression of high-intensity aggressive behaviors. Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 259, p. 137.

    Buzatto, Bruno A. Tomkins, Joseph L. Simmons, Leigh W. and Machado, Glauco 2014. CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND MALE DIMORPHISM IN A CLADE OF NEOTROPICAL HARVESTMEN. Evolution, Vol. 68, Issue. 6, p. 1671.

    Cotton, A J Földvári, M Cotton, S and Pomiankowski, A 2014. Male eyespan size is associated with meiotic drive in wild stalk-eyed flies (Teleopsis dalmanni). Heredity, Vol. 112, Issue. 4, p. 363.

    Goymann, W. and Wingfield, J. C. 2014. Male-to-female testosterone ratios, dimorphism, and life history--what does it really tell us?. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 685.

    OUTOMURO, DAVID CORDERO RIVERA, ADOLFO NAVA-BOLAÑOS, ANGELA and CÓRDOBA-AGUILAR, ALEX 2014. Does allometry of a sexually selected ornamental trait vary with sexual selection intensity? A multi-species test in damselflies. Ecological Entomology, Vol. 39, Issue. 3, p. 399.

    Painting, C. J. Buckley, T. R. and Holwell, G. I. 2014. Weapon allometry varies with latitude in the New Zealand giraffe weevil. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 27, Issue. 12, p. 2864.

    Pélabon, Christophe Firmat, Cyril Bolstad, Geir H. Voje, Kjetil L. Houle, David Cassara, Jason Rouzic, Arnaud Le and Hansen, Thomas F. 2014. Evolution of morphological allometry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1320, Issue. 1, p. 58.

    Richter, Stefan and Wirkner, Christian S. 2014. A research program for Evolutionary Morphology. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, Vol. 52, Issue. 4, p. 338.

    Simmons, Leigh W 2014. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Austral Entomology, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Bubak, Andrew N. Swallow, John G. and Renner, Kenneth J. 2013. Whole brain monoamine detection and manipulation in a stalk-eyed fly. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 219, Issue. 1, p. 124.

    Voje, Kjetil L. and Hansen, Thomas F. 2013. EVOLUTION OF STATIC ALLOMETRIES: ADAPTIVE CHANGE IN ALLOMETRIC SLOPES OF EYE SPAN IN STALK-EYED FLIES. Evolution, Vol. 67, Issue. 2, p. 453.

    Baker, R. H. Narechania, A. Johns, P. M. and Wilkinson, G. S. 2012. Gene duplication, tissue-specific gene expression and sexual conflict in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 367, Issue. 1600, p. 2357.


Artificial sexual selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae)

  • Gerald S. Wilkinson (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2009

Selection for increased and decreased ratio of eye span to body length was exerted on male stalk-eyed flies (Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni) from Malaysia using replicate selected and unselected lines. Response to selection was symmetrical. After 10 generations high line male eye span increased to 1·3 body lengths while low line male eye span declined to 1·1 body lengths. Realized heritabilities for eye span to body length ratio, estimated using regressions of deviations from unselected controls on cumulative selection differentials, were greater than zero for all four selected lines with average h2 = 0·35 + 0·06. The static linear allometric relationship between eye span and body length diverged between selected lines and rotated among selected line males in the same direction as among males in other sexually dimorphic diopsid species. Crosses between lines after 13 generations of selection indicate that the genes which influence relative eye span combine additively and do not exhibit sex linkage or maternal effects. The genetic correlation between the sexes, 0·29 + 0·05 as estimated by the regression of female on male change in eye span, did not prevent sexual dimorphism in eye span from diverging between lines. These results suggest that the exaggerated eye span of male C. dalmanni is maintained by natural selection opposing sexual selection rather than by lack of or asymmetry in additive genetic variation. Furthermore, the variation in sexual dimorphism for eye span-body length allometry observed among extant diopsid species is consistent with sexual selection of variable intensity acting on relative eye span.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

W. D. Atkinson (1979). A field investigation of larval competition in domestic Drosophila. Journal of Animal Ecology 48, 91102.

T. C. M. Bakker (1993). Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363, 255257.

L. M. Botella , A. Moya , M. C. Gonzalez & J. L. Mensua (1985). Larval stop, delayed development and survival in overcrowded cultures of Drosophila melanogaser: effect of urea and uric acid. Journal of Insect Physiology 31, 179185.

D. Burkhardt & I. de la Motte (1985). Selective pressures, variability, and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Naturwissenschaften 72, 204206.

D. Burkhardt & I. de la Motte (1988). Big ‘antlers’ are favoured: female choice in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera, Insecta), field collected harems and laboratory experiments. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 162, 649652.

R. K. Butlin & G. M. Hewitt (1986). Heritability estimates for characters under sexual selection in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus. Animal Behaviour 34, 12561261.

W. H. Cade (1981). Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets. Science 212, 563564.

H. L. Carson & R. Lande (1984). Inheritance of a secondary sexual character in Drosophila silvestris. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA81, 69046907.

A. G. Cock (1966). Genetical aspects of growth and form in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology 41, 131190.

I. de la Motte & D. Burkhardt (1983). Portrait of an Asian stalk-eyed fly. Naturwissenschaften 70, 451461.

A. V. Hedrick (1988). Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: an empirical study. American Naturalist 132, 267276.

W. G. Hill (1971). Design and efficiency of selection experiments for estimating genetic parameters. Biometrics 27, 293311.

W. G. Hill (1972b). Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. II. Selection in one direction. Biometrics 28, 767780.

A. Houde (1992). Sex-linked heritability of a sexually-selected character in a natural population of guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poecilidae). Heredity 69, 229235.

C. P. Klingenberg & M. Zimmermann (1992). Static, ontogenetic, and evolutionary allometry: a multivariate comparison in nine species of water striders. American Naturalist 140, 601620.

R. Lande (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33, 402416.

R. Lande (1980). Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34, 292305.

R. Lande (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA78, 37213725.

P. Lorch , G. S. Wilkinson & P. R. Reillo (1993). Copulation duration and sperm precedence in the Malaysian stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diptera: Diopsidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32, 303311.

J. Maynard Smith & R. L. Brown (1986). Competition and body size. Theoretical Population Biology 30, 166179.

D. K. McLain (1987). Heritability of size, a sexually selected character, and the response to sexual selection in a natural population of the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Heredity 59, 391395.

A. J. Moore (1989). The inheritance of social dominance, mating behavior, and attractiveness to mates in male Nauphoeta cinerea. Animal Behaviour 39, 388397.

L. Partridge & K. Fowler (1993). Responses and correlated responses to artificial selection on thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 47, 213226.

A. Pomiankowski , Y. Iwasa & S. Nee (1991). The evolution of costly male preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45, 14221430.

F. W. Robertson (1960). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. I. Body size and development time on different diets. Genetical Research 1, 288304.

J. F. Shillito (1971). Dimorphism in flies with stalked eyes. Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society 50, 297305.

L. W. Simmons (1987). Heritability of a male character chosen by females of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 21, 129133.

L. W. Simmons & P. I. Ward (1991). The heritability of sexually dimorphic traits in the yellow dung fly Scatophaga stercoraria (L.). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4, 593601.

G. S. Wilkinson (1987). Equilibrium analysis of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 41, 1121.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Genetics Research
  • ISSN: 0016-6723
  • EISSN: 1469-5073
  • URL: /core/journals/genetics-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *