Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle

  • KLARA L. VERBYLA (a1) (a2) (a3), BEN J. HAYES (a1), PHILIP J. BOWMAN (a1) and MICHAEL E. GODDARD (a1) (a2) (a3)
Abstract
Summary

Genomic selection describes a selection strategy based on genomic breeding values predicted from dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Multiple methods have been proposed but the critical issue is how to decide whether an SNP should be included in the predictive set to estimate breeding values. One major disadvantage of the traditional Bayes B approach is its high computational demands caused by the changing dimensionality of the models. The use of stochastic search variable selection (SSVS) retains the same assumptions about the distribution of SNP effects as Bayes B, while maintaining constant dimensionality. When Bayesian SSVS was used to predict genomic breeding values for real dairy data over a range of traits it produced accuracies higher or equivalent to other genomic selection methods with significantly decreased computational and time demands than Bayes B.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. e-mail: klara.verbyla@dpi.vic.gov.au
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. J. Brown , M. Vannucci & T. Fearn (1998). Multivariate Bayesian variable selection and prediction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology 60, 627641.

M. P. L. Calus , T. H. E. Meuwissen , A. P. W. de Roos & R. F. Veerkamp (2008). Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 178, 553561.

M. P. L. Calus & R. F. Veerkamp (2007). Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 362368.

E. I. George & R. E. McCulloch (1993). Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 881889.

P. J. Green (1995). Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82, 711732.

B. Grisart , W. Coppieters , F. Farnir , L. Karim , C. Ford . (2002). Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Research 12, 222231.

B. J. Hayes , P. J. Bowman , A. J. Chamberlain & M. E. Goddard (2009). Invited Review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433443.

T. H. E. Meuwissen & M. E. Goddard (2004). Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data. Genetics Selection Evolution 36, 261279.

M. D. Swartz , M. Kimmel , P. Mueller & C. I. Amos (2006). Stochastic search gene suggestion: a Bayesian hierarchical model for gene mapping. Biometrics 62, 495503.

N. J. Yi , V. George & D. B. Allison (2003). Stochastic search variable selection for identifying multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 164, 11291138.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Genetics Research
  • ISSN: 0016-6723
  • EISSN: 1469-5073
  • URL: /core/journals/genetics-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×